Dyadic and group perspectives on close relationships

International Journal of Behavioral Development

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 97-100

  Laursen, Brett ^a  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; FAMILY; FRIEND; FRIENDSHIP; GROUP PSYCHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INDIVIDUALITY; LIFESPAN; PERSONALITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL STATUS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EID: 15444380166     PISSN: 01650254     EISSN: 14640651     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01650250444000450     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Adams, R. E., Bukowski, W. M., & Bagwell, C. (2005). Stability of aggression in early adolescence as moderated by reciprocated friendship status and friend's aggression. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 139-145.
2. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
3. Branje, S. J. T., Van Lieshout, C. F. M., & Van Aken, M. A. G. (2005). Relations between Agreeableness and perceived support in family relationships: Why nice people are not always supportive. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 120-128.
4. Burk, W. J., & Laursen, B. (2005). Adolescent perceptions of friendship and their associations with individual adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 156-164.
5. Card, N. A., Hodges, E. V. E., Little, T. D., & Hawley, P. H. (2005). Gender effects in peer nominations for aggression and social status. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 146-155.
6. Cillessen, A. H. N., Jiang, X. L., West, T. V., & Laszkowski, D. K. (2005). Predictors of dyadic friendship quality in adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 165-172.
7. Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The Actor-Partner Interdependence Model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 101-109.
8. Hartup, W. W., & Laursen, B. (1999). Relationships as developmental contexts: Retrospective themes and contemporary issues. In W. A. Collins & B. Laursen (Eds), The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology: Vol. 30. Relationships as developmental contexts (pp. 13-35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
9. Kashy, D. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 451-477). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Kelly, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (1983). Close relationships. New York: Freeman.
11. Kenny, D. A. (1995). Design and analysis issues in dyadic research. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 164-184.
12. Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1985). Separating individual and group effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 339-348.
13. Laursen, B., & Bukowski, W. M. (1997). A developmental guide to the organisation of close relationships. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 21, 747-770.
14. Little, T. D., & Card, N. A. (2005). On the use of Social Relations and Actor-Partner Interdependence Models in developmental research. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 173-179.
15. Martin, J. L., & Ross, H. S. (2005). Sibling aggression: Sex differences and parents' reactions. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 129-138.
16. Reis, H. T., Collins, W. A., & Berscheid, E. (2000). The relationship context of human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 844-872.
17. Ross, H., Stein, N., Trabasso, T., Woody, E., & Ross, M. (2005). The quality of family relationships within and across generations. A social relations analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 110-119.