Research of the performance measurement system: Environmental perspective

Engineering Economics

Volumn , Issue 2, 2010, Pages 180-186

  Gimzauskiene, Edita ^a   Kloviene, Lina ^a  

^a KAUNAS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Complexity theory; Contingency theory; Performance measurement system

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954052310     PISSN: 13922785     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alas, R., Sharifi, S., & Sun, W. (2009). China and Estonia in Flux: is this a Valid Basis for Comparison of their Approaches to Change Management? Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics(2), 18-27.
2. Bechtold, B. L. (1997). Chaos theory as a model for strategy development. Empowerment in Organizations, 5(4), 193-201.
3. Beeson, I., & Davis, C. (2000). Emergence and accomplishment in organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(2), 178-189.
4. Biazzo, S. & Bernardi, G. (2003). Organisational self-assessment options: a classification and a conceptual map for SMEs. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(8), 881-900.
5. Boguslauskas, V., & Kvedaraviciene, G. (2009). Difficulties in identifying Company's Core Competencies and Core Processes. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics(2), 75-81.
6. Brodbeck, P.W. (2002). Implications for organization design: teams as pockets of excellence. Team Performance Management: an International Journal, 8(1/2), 21-38.
7. Burnes, B. (2005a). Complexity theories and organizational change. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(2), 73-90.
8. Burnes, B. (2005). Kurt Lewin and complexity theories: back to the future? Journal of Change Management, 4(4), 309-325.
9. Ciegis, R., Ramanauskiene, J., & Startiene, G. (2009). Theoretical Reasoning of the Use of Indicators and Indices for Sustainable Development Assessment. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics(3), 33-40.
10. Dumludag, D. (2009). An Analysis of the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Turkey: The Role of the Institutional Context. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(1), 15-30.
11. Garengo, P., Biazzo, S. & Bititci, U. (2005). Performance measurement systems in SMEs: a review for a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(1), 25-47.
12. Garengo, P, & Bititci, U. (2007). Towards a contingency approach to performance measurement: an empirical study in Scottish SMEs. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(8), 802-825.
13. Gimzauskiene, E., & Kloviene, L. (2008a). Implementing activity based management: the role of organizational values. Social research, 4(14), 26-35.
14. Gimzauskiene, E., & Kloviene, L. (2008b). The role of institutional factors on changes of performance measurement system. Economics & Management-2008, 22-29.
15. Gimzauskiene, E., & Valanciene, L. (2005) Performance measurement in the context of knowledge economy Conference on Accounting and Performance Management Perspectives in Business and Public Sector Organizations, SEP 29-30, 2005 Tartu University, Tartu, ESTONIA Conference Proceedings, 142-151.
16. Ginevicius, R., & Podvezko, V. (2009). Evaluating the Changes in Economic and Social Development of Lithuanian Counties by Multiple Criteria Methods. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 15(3), 418-436.
17. Girdzijauskas, S. A., Streimikiene, D., & Dubnikovas, M. (2009). Analysing Banking Capital with Loglet Lab Software Package. Transformations in Business & Economics, 8(2), 45-56.
18. Grobman, M. G. (2005). Complexity Theory: a new way to look at organizational change. The Pennsylvania State University Harrisburg, PAQ FALL, 351-384.
19. Gudas, S. (2009). Enterprise Knowledge Modelling: Domains and Aspects. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 15(2), 281-293.
20. Gudonavicius, L., Bartoseviciene, V., & Saparnis, G. (2009). Imperatives for Enterprise Strategists. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics(1), 75-82.
21. Houchin, K., & MacLean, D. (2005). Complexity Theory and Strategic Change: an Empirically Informed Critique. British Journal of Management, 16, 149-166.
22. Hudson, M., Smart, P. A., & Bourne, M. (2001). Theory and practice in SME performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21 (8), 1096-115.
23. Jenner, R. A. (1998). Dissipative enterprises, chaos, and the principles of lean organizations. Omega: International Journal of Management Science, 26(3), 397-407.
24. Keene, A. (2000). Complexity theory: the changing role of leadership. Industrial and Commercial Training 32(1), 15-18.
25. Letiche, H. (2000). Phenomenal complexity theory as informed by Bergson. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(6), 545-557.
26. Macbeth, D. K. (2002). Emergent strategy in managing cooperative supply chain change. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 22(7), 728-740.
27. MacIntosh, R., & MacLean, D. (2001). Conditioned emergence: researching change and changing research. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21(10), 1343-1357.
28. Manson, S. M. (2001). Simplifying complexity: a review of complexity theory. Geoforum, 32, 405-414.
29. Miguel, P. C., & Joao, V. C. (2006). Towards a complexity theory of strategy. Management Decision, 44(7), 839-850.
30. Rooney, D., & Hearn, G. (1999). The zone of entanglement: change, non-change and the new managerial ideology of ephemera. Foresight, 1(2), 143-53.
31. Smith, C. T. A. (2005). Complexity theory for organizational futures studies. Foresight 7(3), 22-30.
32. Snieska, V., & Bruneckiene, J. (2009). Measurement of Lithuanian Regions by Regional Competitiveness Index. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics(1), 45-57.
33. Stacey, R. (1996). Management and the Science of Complexity: If Organizational Life is Nonlinear, Can Business Strategies Prevail? Research-Technology Management, 39, 8-10.
34. Styhre, A. (2002). Non-linear change in organizations: organization change management informed by complexity theory. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 23(6), 343-351.
35. Strumickas, M., & Valanciene, L. (2009). Research of Management Accounting Changes in Lithuanian Business Organizations. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics(3), 26-32.
36. Quinn, R. E. (1984). Criteria of Effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management science, 29. 33-51.
37. Tetenbaum T. (1998). Shifting paradigms: from Newton to chaos. Organizational Dynamics, 26(4), 21-32.
38. Tvaronaviciene, M, Grybaite, V., & Tvaronaviciene, A. (2009). If Institutional Performance Matters: Development Comparisons of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(3), 271-278.
39. Valanciene, L., & Gimzauskiene, E. (2007). Changing role of management accounting: Lithuanian Experience case studies. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics(5), 16-23.
40. Valanciene, L., & Gimzauskiene, E. (2008). Dimensions of open system in performance measurement: theoretical aspect. Economics and Management, 13, 79-87.