Bi-criteria evaluation of the MIKE SHE model for a forested watershed on the South Carolina coastal plain

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1033-1046

  Dai, Z ^a   Li, C ^a   Trettin, C ^b   Sun, G ^c   Amatya, D ^b   Li, H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

^b Center for Forested Wetlands Research   (United States)

^c USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COASTAL PLAIN; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGY; MODEL VALIDATION; STREAMFLOW; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; WATER TABLE; WATERSHED;

ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN; SOUTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77954037866     PISSN: 10275606     EISSN: 16077938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hess-14-1033-2010     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abbott, M., Bathurst, J., Cunge, J., O'Connell, P., and Rasmussen, J.: An Introduction to the European Hydrological System-Sys-teme Hydrologique Europeen, "SHE", 1: History and Philosophy of a Physically-based, Distributed Modelling System, J. Hydrol., 87, 45-59, 1986a.
2. Abbott, M., Bathurst, J., Cunge, J., O'Connell, P., and Rasmussen, J.: An Introduction to the European Hydrological System-Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, "SHE", 2: Structure of a Physically-based, Distributed Modelling System, J. Hydrol., 87, 61-77, 1986b.
3. Amatya, D. and Skaggs, R.: Hydrologic modeling of a drained pine plantation on poorly drained soils, Forest Science, 47, 103-114, 2001.
4. Amatya, D., Sun, G., Trettin, C., and Skaggs, R.: Long-term forest hydrologic monitoring in coastal Carolinas, in: First Interagency Conference on Research in the Watersheds, edited by: Renard, K. G., McElroy, S. A., Gburek, W. J., Canfield, H. E., and Scott, R. L., 27-30 October 2003, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 279-285, 2003.
5. Arnold, J., Allen, P., and Morgan, D.: Hydrologic model for design and constructed wetlands, Wetlands, 21, 167-178, 2001.
6. Beven, K.: A manifesto for the equifinality thesis, J. Hydrol., 320, 18-36, 2006.
7. Blasone, R. S., Madsen, H., and Rosbjerg, D.: Uncertainty assessment of integrated distributed hydrological models using GLUE with Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling, J. Hydrol., 353, 18-32, 2008.
8. Boyle, D., Gupta, H., and Sorooshian, S.: Multicriteria calibration of hydrologic models, in: Calibration of Watershed Models, edited by: Duan, Q., Gupta, H., Sorooshian, S., Rousseau, A., Turcotte, R., AGU, 185-196, 2003.
9. Cui, J., Li, C., and Trettin, C.: Analyzing the ecosystem carbon and hydrologic characteristics of forested wetland using a bio-geochemical process model, Global Change Biology, 11, 278-289, 2005
10. DHI: MIKE SHE Technical Reference, Version 2005, DHI Water and Environment, Danish Hydraulic Institute, Denmark, 2005.
11. El-Nasr, A., Feyen, J., and Berlamont, J.: Modeling a Mid-size Catchment Using a Physically Distributed Hydrologic Model, Amer. Inst. of Hydrology, Hydrol. Sci. & Techn., Special Issue, 17, 1-10, 2001.
12. El-Sadek, A.: Upscaling field scale hydrology and water quality modeling to catchment scale, Water Resour. Manage., 21, 149-169, 2007.
13. Federal Register: Changes in hydric soils of the United Sates, 13 July 1994.
14. Federal Register: Hydric soils of the United States, 18 September 2002.
15. Freer, J., Beven, K., and Peters, N.: Multivariate Seasonal Period Model Rejection Within the Generalised Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation Procedure, in: Calibration of Watershed Models, edited by: Duan, Q., Gupta, H., Sorooshian, S., Rousseau, A., Turcotte, R., AGU, 69-88, 2003.
16. Graham, D. and Butts, M.: Chapter 10 flexible integrated watershed modeling with MIKE SHE, in: Watershed Models, edited by: Singh, V. and Frevert, D., CRC Press, 2005.
17. Harder, S.: Hydrology and Water Budget of a First Order Forested Coastal Plain Watershed, South Carolina, M.Sc. Thesis, College of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina, 168 pp., 2004.
18. Harder, S., Amatya, D., Callahan, T., and Trettin, C.: Modeling the Monthly Water Balance of a First Order Coastal Forested Watershed, Hydrology and Management of Forested Wetlands Proceedings of the International Conference 8-12 April 2006, New Bern, North Carolina, Publication Date 8 April 2006, 701P0406, 218-230, 2006.
19. Harder, S., Amatya, D., Callahan, T., Trettin, C., and Hakkila, J.: Hydrology and water budget for a forested Atlantic Coastal Plain watershed, South Carolina, JAWRA, 43, 563-575, 2007.
20. Heath, R.: Hydrology of the Albemarle-Pamlico Region of North Carolina, USGS Water Resources Investigation 9-75, 98 pp., 1975.
21. Hook, D., Buford, M., and Williams, T.: Impact of Hurricane Hugo on the South Carolina Coastal Plain Forest, J. Coastal Research (Special Issue No. 8), 291-300, 1991.
22. Kirchner, J.: Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analysis, and models to advance the science of hydrology, Water Resour. Res., 42, W03S04, doi:10.1029/2005WR004362, 2006.
23. Lamb, R., Beven, K., and Myrabø, S.: Use of spatially distributed water table observations to constrain uncertainty in a rainfall-runoff model, Adv. Water Resour., 22, 305-317, doi:10.1016/S0309-1708(98)00020-7, 1998. (Pubitemid 29145481)
24. Liu, J., Williams, J., Zehnder, A., and Yang, H.: GEPIC-modeling wheat yield and crop water productivity with high resolution on a global scale, Agri. Syst., 94, 478-493, doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2006.11.019, 2007. (Pubitemid 46498486)
25. Lu, J., Sun, G., Amatya, D., Harder, S., and McNulty, S.: Understanding the hydrological response of a coastal plain watershed to forest management and climate change in South Carolina, USA Hydrology and Management of Forested Wetlands Proceedings of the International Conference 8-12 April 2006, New Bern, North Carolina, Publication Date 8 April 2006, 701P0406, 231-239, 2006.
26. Lu, J., Sun, G., McNulty, S., and Comerford, N.: Sensitivity of pine flatwoods hydrology to climate change and forest management in Florida, USA, Wetlands 29, 826-836, 2009.
27. Mansell, R., Bloom, S., and Sun, G.: A model for wetland hydrology: Description and Validation, Soil Science, 165, 384-397, 2000.
28. Martinez, C., Campbell, K., Annable, M., and Kiker, G.: An object-oriented hydrologic model for humid, shallow water-table environments, J. Hydrol., 351, 368-381, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.01.002, 2008.
29. Meixner, T., Gupta, H., Bastidas, L., and Bales, R.: Estimating parameters and structure of a hydrologic model using multiple criteria, in Calibration of Watershed Models, edited by: Duan, Q., Gupta, H., Sorooshian, S., Rousseau, A., Turcotte, R., AGU, 213-228, 2003.
30. Mernild, S., Hasholt, B., and Liston, G.: Climatic control on river streamflow simulations, Zackenberg River drainage basin, northeast Greenland, Hydrol. Process., 22, 1932-1948, doi:10.1002/hyp.6777, 2008. (Pubitemid 351983227)
31. Monteith, J.: Evaporation and Environment, in: Proceedings of the 19th Symposium of the Society for Experimental Biology, edited by: Fogg, G., Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, 205-234, 1965.
32. Moriasi, D., Arnold, J., Liew, M. W. V., Bingner, R., Harmel, R., and Veith, T.: Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations, ASABE 50(3), 885-899, 2007.
33. Nash, J. and Sutcliffe, J.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models-Part I: A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282-290, 1970.
34. Refsgaard, J.: Parameterization, calibration and validation of distributed hydrologic models, J. Hydrol., 198, 69-97, 1997. (Pubitemid 27340887)
35. Riekerk, H., Jones, S., Morris, L., and Pratt, D.: Hydrology and water quality of three small lower coastal plain forested watersheds, in: Proceedings of the Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida, edited by: Horner, E., Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 38, 105-111, 1979.
36. Sahoo, G., Ray, C., and Carlo, E.: Calibration and validation of a physically distributed hydrological model, MIKE SHE, to predict streamflow at high frequency in a flashy mountainous Hawaii stream, J. Hydrol., 327, 94-109, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.11.012, 2006. (Pubitemid 44066392)
37. SCS (Soil Conservation Service): Soil Survey of Berkeley County, South Carolina, United States Department of Agriculture, 99 pp., 1980.
38. Shrestha, R. and Rode, M.: Multi-objective calibration and fuzzy preference selection of a distributed hydrological model, Environ, Modeling and Software, 23, 1384-1395, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.04.001, 2008.
39. Singh, R., Subramanian, K., and Refsgaard, J.: Hydrological modeling of a small watershed using MIKE SHE for irrigation planning, Agr. Water Manage., 41, 149-166, 1999.
40. Skaggs, R., Gilliam, J., and Evans, R.: A Computer Simulation Study of Pocosin Hydrology, Wetlands, 11(special issue), 399-416, 1991.
41. Staes, J., Rubarenzya, M., Meire, P., and Willems, P.: Modelling hydrological effects of wetland restoration: a differentiated view, Water Sci. Technol. 59, 433-441, 2009.
42. Sun, G., Riekerk, H., and Comerford, N.: Modeling the hydrologic impacts of forest harvesting on Florida flatwoods, JAWRA, 34, 843-854, 1998.
43. Sun, G., Lu, J., Gartner, D., Miwa, M., and Trettin, C.: Water Budgets of Two Forested Watersheds in South Carolina, in: Proceedings of the Spring Special Conference, edited by: Higgins, R., American Water Resources Association, Miami, Florida, 199-202, 2000.
44. Vázquez, R.F., Willems, P., and Feyen, J.: Improving the predictions of a MIKE SHE catchment-scale application by using a multi-criteria approach, Hydrol. Process., 22, 2159-2179, doi:10.1002/hyp.6815, 2008. (Pubitemid 351927459)
45. Vrugt, J., Braak, C. J. F. T., Clark, M., and Hyman, J.: Treatment of input uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Doing hydrology backward with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation, Water Re-sour. Res., 44, W00B09, doi:10.1029/2007WR006720, 2008.
46. Xu, C.-Y. and Singh, V.: Evaluation of three complementary relationship evapotranspiration models by water balance approach to estimate actual regional evapotranspiration in different climatic regions, J. Hydrol., 308, 105-121, 2005.
47. Yan, J. and Smith, K.: Simulation of integrated surface water and ground water systems-Model formulation, Water Resour. Bull., 30, 1-12, 1994.
48. Zhang, Z., Wang, S., Sun, G., McNulty, S., Zhang, H., Li, J., Zhang, M., Klaghofer, E., and Strauss, P.: Evaluation of the MIKE SHE model for application in the Loess Plateau, China, JAWRA, 44, 1108-1120, 2008.