Understanding the hydrologic response of a coastal plain watershed to forest management and climate change in South Carolina, U.S.A.

Hydrology and Management of Forested Wetlands - Proceeding of the International Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 231-239

  Lu, J ^a,b   Sun, G ^c   Amatya, D M ^c   Harder, S V ^c   McNulty, S G ^c  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Ecological Solutions Inc   (United States)

^c USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Forest management; Hydrologic modeling; MIKE SHE; Wetland hydrology

Indexed keywords

AIR TEMPERATURES; CLIMATE VARIABILITY AND CHANGES; COASTAL PLAINS; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FOREST REMOVALS; FORESTED WATERSHEDS; GROUNDWATER RECHARGES; HYDROLOGIC CYCLES; HYDROLOGIC MODELING; HYDROLOGIC MODELS; HYDROLOGIC PROCESSES; HYDROLOGIC RESPONSES; LEAF AREA INDEXES; MIKE SHE; MODEL SIMULATIONS; MODELING RESULTS; OVERLAND FLOWS; PHYSICALLY BASED; SATURATED SOILS; SOUTH CAROLINA; SPATIALLY DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGIC MODELS; UNITED STATES; VALIDATED MODELS; WATER TABLES; WET PERIODS; WETLAND ECOSYSTEMS; WETLAND HYDROLOGY;

AQUIFERS; ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATOLOGY; COASTAL ZONES; DROUGHT; EARTH SCIENCES; FORESTRY; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GEOLOGIC MODELS; GROUNDWATER; HYDROGEOLOGY; HYDROLOGY; LANDFORMS; MANAGEMENT; PHASE INTERFACES; RUNOFF; SOIL MOISTURE; SOILS; UNDERGROUND RESERVOIRS; UNDERWATER SOILS; WATER; WATER SUPPLY; WATERSHEDS; WETLANDS;

HYDRAULIC MODELS;

EID: 58149344964     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Abbott, M. B., J. C. Bathurst, J. A. Cunge, P. E. O'Connell and J. Rasmussen. 1986. An introduction to the European Hydrological System - Systeme Hydrologique Europeen "SHE" 1: History and philosophy of a physically based distributed modeling system. Journal of Hydrology 87:45-59.
2. Amatya, D. M. and R. W. Skaggs. 2001. Hydrologic modeling of pine plantations on poorly drained soils. Forest Science 47(1): 103-114.
3. Andreassian, 2004. Waters and forests: from historical controversy to scientific debate. Journal of Hydrology. 291:1-27.
4. Clark, K. L., H. L. Gholz and M. S. Castro. 2004. Carbon dynamics along a chronosequence of slash pine plantations in North Florida. Ecological Applications 14(4): 1154-1171.
5. Danish Hydraulic Institute (DHI). 2004. MIKE SHE An Integrated Hydrological Modelling System - User Guide. Edition 2004.
6. Douglass, J. E. and W. T. Swank. 1972. Streamflow modification through management of eastern forests. Res. Pap. SE-94. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
7. Gholz, H. L. and K. L. Clark. 2002. Energy exchange across a chronosequence of slash pine forests in Florida. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 112: 87-102.
8. Graham, D. N. and M. B. Butts. 2005. CHAPTER 10 FLEXIBLE INTEGRATED WATERSHED MODELING WITH MIKE SHE. In Watershed Models. Ed. V.P. Singh and D.K. Frevert, CRC Press.
9. Hamon, W. R. 1963. Computation of direct runoff amounts from storm rainfall. Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol. Pub. 63: 52-62.
10. Harder, S. V. 2004. Hydrology and water budget of a first order forested coastal plain watershed, South Carolina. MS thesis. Charleston, SC: College of Charleston.
11. Im, S., H. Kim, C. Kim and C. Jang. 2004. Evaluation of MIKE SHE modeling system to a forested watershed in Korea. ASAE/CSAE meeting paper No. 042104. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
12. Liu, S. 1996. Evapotranspiration from cypress (Taxodium ascendens) wetlands and slash pine (Pinus elliottii) uplands in north-central Florida. Ph.D. diss. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
13. Lu, J., G Sun, S. G McNulty, and D. M. Amatya. 2005. A Comparison of Six Potential Evapotranspiration Methods for Regional Use in the Southeastern United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 41(3): 621-633.
14. McNulty, S. G, J. M. Vose, and W. T. Swank, 1997. Regional Hydrologic Response of Southern Pine Forests to Potential Air Temperature and Precipitation Changes. Water Resources Association Bulletin 33:1011-1022.
15. Nash, J. E. and I. V. Sutcliffe. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10:282-290.
16. Refsgaard, J. C. and B. Storm. 1995. MIKE SHE. In Computer Models in Watershed Hydrology, 806-846. Colorado, USA: Water Resources Publications.
17. Soil Conservation Service (SCS). 1980. Soil Survey Report of Berkeley County, South Carolina. United States Department of Agriculture.
18. Sun, G., H. Riekerk, and N. B. Comerford. 1998. Modeling the hydrologic impacts of forest harvesting on flatwoods. Journal of American Water Resources Association 34: 843-854.
19. Sun, G., D. M. Amatya, S. G McNulty, R. W. Skaggs, and J. H. Hughes. 2000. Climate change impacts on the hydrology and productivity of a pine plantation. Journal of American Water Resources Association 36(2): 367-374.
20. Sun, G., M. Riedel, R. Jackson, R. Kolka, D. Amatya, and J. Shepard. 2004. Chapter 19: Influences of management of southern forests on water quantity and quality. In Southern Forest Science: Past, Present, and Future, 195-224. Asheville, NC.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station.
21. Swank, W. T. and J. E. Douglass. 1974. Streamflow greatly reduced by converting deciduous hardwood stands to white pine. Science 185: 857-859.
22. Swank, W. T., J. M. Vose and K. J. Elliot. 2001. Long-term hydrologic and water quality responses following commercial clearcutting of mixed hardwoods on a Southern Appalachian catchment. Forest Ecology and Management 143: 163-178.
23. Vazquez, R. F., P. Willems, J. Feyen and J. Berlamont. 2004. Multi-criteria evaluation of the performance of the MIKE SHE code applied at a catchment scale. ASAE/CSAE meeting paper No. 042105. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.