Calibration and validation of a physically distributed hydrological model, MIKE SHE, to predict streamflow at high frequency in a flashy mountainous Hawaii stream

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 327, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 94-109

  Sahoo, G B ^a   Ray, C ^a   De Carlo, E H ^b  

^a University of Hawaii at Manoa   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Distributed hydrologic model; Flash flood streamflow; Mountainous stream; Split calibration

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; HYDROLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RAIN; REGIONAL PLANNING; STORMS;

DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGIC MODELS; FLASH-FLOOD STREAMFLOW; MOUNTAINOUS STREAM; SPLIT CALIBRATION;

STREAM FLOW;

CALIBRATION; HYDROLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RAIN; REGIONAL PLANNING; STORMS; STREAM FLOW;

BASEFLOW; CALIBRATION; DRAINAGE BASIN; FLASH FLOOD; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; MODEL VALIDATION; PEAK DISCHARGE; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; WATERSHED;

HAWAII [UNITED STATES]; HAWAIIAN ISLANDS; NORTH AMERICA; OAHU; PACIFIC ISLANDS; PACIFIC OCEAN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33746010562     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.11.012     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Allen R.G. REF-ET (2002), University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, USA
2. Andersen J., Refsgaard J.C., and Jensen K.H. Distributed hydrological modelling of the Senegal River Basin - model construction and validation. Journal of Hydrology 247 (2001) 200-214
3. Burnash R.J.C. The NWS river forecast system-catchment modelling. In: Singh V.P. (Ed). Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology (1995), Water Resources Publications 311-366
4. Christiaens K., and Feyen J. Analysis of uncertainties associated with different methods to determine soil hydraulic properties and their propagation in the distributed hydrological MIKE-SHE model. Journal of Hydrology 246 (2001) 63-81
5. Crawford, N.H., Linsey, R.K., 1966. Digital simulation in hydrology, Stanford Watershed Model IV. Technical Report 39, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, California, USA.
6. DHI. MIKE SHE Flow Modules Manual (2003), Danish Hydraulic Institute, Denmark
7. ESRI. ArcGIS Spatial Analyst. Advanced Spatial Analysis Using Raster and Vector Data (2002), Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc, Redlands, California, USA
8. Essaid H.I. A comparison of the coupled freshwater-saltwater flow and the Ghyben-Herzberg sharp interface approaches to modeling of transient behavior in coastal aquifer systems. Journal of Hydrology 86 (1986) 169-193
9. Eyre, P.R., Ewart, C., Shade, P.J., 1986. Hydrology of the Leeward aquifers, southeast Oahu, Hawaii. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 85-4270.
10. Feyen L., Vázquez R., Christiaens K., Sels O., and Feyen J. Application of a distributed physically-based hydrological model to a medium size catchment. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 4 1 (2000) 47-63
11. Gupta H.V., Sorooshian S., and Yapo P.O. Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: multiple and noncommensurable measures of information. Water Resources Research 34 4 (1998) 751-763
12. Holtan, H.N., Stiltner, G.F., Hensen, W.H., Lopez, N.C., 1975. USDA-74 revised model of watershed hydrology. Technical Bulletin No. 1518, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA.
13. Jasper K., Gurtz J., and Lang H. Advanced flood forecasting in Alpine watersheds by coupling meterological observations and forecasts with a distributed hydrological model. Journal of Hydrology 267 (2002) 40-52
14. Jayatilaka C.J., Storm B., and Mudgway L.B. Simulation of flow on irrigation bay scale with MIKE-SHE. Journal of Hydrology 208 (1998) 108-130
15. Johnson M.S., Coon W.F., Mehta V.K., Steenhuis T.S., Brooks E.S., and Boll J. Application of two hydrologic models with different runoff mechanisms to a hillslope dominated watershed in the northern US: a comparison of HSPF and SMR. Journal of Hydrology 284 (2003) 57-76
16. Klemes V. Operational testing of hydrological simulation models. Hydrological Sciences Journal 31 1 (1986) 13-24
17. Knudsen J., Thomsen A., and Refsgaard J.C. WATBAL: A semi-distributed, physically based hydrological modelling system. Nordic Hydrology 17 (1986) 347-362
18. Kristensen K.J., and Jensen S.E. A model for estimating actual evapotranspiration from potential evapotranspiration. Nordic Hydrology 6 (1975) 170-188
19. Legates D.R., and McCabe Jr. G.J. Evaluating the use of goodness-of-fit measures in hydrologic and hydro-climatic model validation. Water Resources Research 35 1 (1999) 233-241
20. Marshall T.J., and Holmes J.W. Soil Physics (1988), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, USA
21. Mink, J.F., Lau, L.S., 1980. Hawaiian groundwater geology and hydrology, and early mathematical models. Technical Memorandum Report 62, Water Resources Research Center, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
22. Refsgaard J.C. Parameterization, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models. Journal of Hydrology 198 (1997) 69-97
23. Refsgaard J.C., and Knudsen J. Operational validation and intercomparison of different types of hydrological models. Water Resources Research 32 7 (1996) 2189-2202
24. Refsgaard J.C., Thorsen M., Jensen J.B., Kleeschulte S., and Hansen S. Large scale modelling of groundwater contamination from nitrate leaching. Journal of Hydrology 221 (1999) 117-140
25. Romano N., and Palladino M. Prediction of soil water retention using soil physical data and terrain attributes. Journal of Hydrology 265 (2002) 56-75
26. Sahoo G.B., Ray C., and De Carlo E.H. Flow Forecasting Using Artificial Neural Network and a Distributed Hydrological Model MIKE SHE. International Conference on Emerging Technology (ICET) (2004), Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology, India
27. Shade, P.J., Nichols, W.D., 1996. Water budget and the effects of land-use changes on ground-water recharge, Oahu, Hawaii: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1412-C, 38 p.
28. Singh R., Subramanian K., and Refsgaard J.C. Hydrological modeling of a small watershed using MIKE SHE for irrigation planning. Agricultural Water Management 41 (1999) 149-166
29. Sooroshian S., and Gupta V.K. Model calibration. In: Singh V.P. (Ed). Computer models of Watershed Hydrology (1995), Water Resources Publications, Colorado, USA 23-68
30. Souza W.R., and Voss C.I. Analysis of an anisotropic coastal aquifer system using variable-density flow and solute transport simulation. Journal of Hydrology 92 (1987) 17-41
31. Tomlinson M.S., and De Carlo E.H. The need for high resolution time series data to characterize Hawaiian Streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 39 1 (2003) 113-123
32. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2001 Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Island of Oahu, Hawaii, ftp://ftp.ftw.nrcs.usda.gov/pub/ssurgo/online98/data/hi990/ (verified 10/5/04).
33. USGS, 1996. Summary of the Oahu, Hawaii, regional aquifer-system analysis. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1412-A.
34. USGS, 1998. Geohydrology of the central Oahu, Hawaii, ground-water flow system and numerical simulation of the effects of additional pumping. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 97-4276.
35. van Genuchten M.Th., Simunek J., Leij F.J., and Sejna M. RETC (1998), United States Salinity Laboratory, USDA, Riverside, California, USA
36. Vázquez R.F., and Feyen J. Effect of potential evapotranspiration estimates on effective parameters and performance of the MIKE SHE code applied to a medium-size catchment. Journal of Hydrology 270 (2003) 309-327
37. Xevi E., Christiaens K., Espino A., Sewnandan W., Mallants D., Sorensen H., and Feyen J. Calibration, Validation and Sensitivity Analysis of the MIKE SHE model using the Neuenkirchen Catchment as case study. Water Resources Management 11 (1997) 219-242