Cues that trigger social transmission of disinhibition in young children

Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Volumn 107, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 181-187

  Moriguchi, Yusuke ^a   Minato, Takashi ^b   Ishiguro, Hiroshi ^c   Shinohara, Ikuko ^d   Itakura, Shoji ^e  

^a JOETSU UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^c OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d AICHI SHUKUTOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Dimensional Change Card Sort; Executive function; Preschool children; Robot; Simulative process; Social cognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CHILD BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; ROBOTICS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TASK PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOLOGY;

CHILD BEHAVIOR; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COGNITION; CUES; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ROBOTICS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 77954029401     PISSN: 00220965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.04.018     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Barkley R.A. Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin 1997, 121:65-94.
2. Bartneck C., Kulic D., Croft E., Zoghbi S. Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 2009, 1:71-81.
3. Biro S., Leslie A.M. Infants' perception of goal-directed actions: Development through cue-based bootstrapping. Developmental Science 2007, 10:379-398.
4. Carlson S.M., Moses L.J. Individual differences in inhibitory control and children's theory of mind. Child Development 2001, 72:1032-1053.
5. Davidson M.C., Amsoa D., Anderson L.C., Diamond A. Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:2037-2078.
6. Durston S., Thomas K.M., Yang Y., Ulug A.M., Zimmerman R.D., Casey B.J. A neural basis for the development of inhibitory control. Developmental Science 2002, 5:F9-F16.
7. Gergely G., Csibra G. Teleological reasoning in infancy: The one-year-olds' naive theory of rational action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:287-292.
8. Gergely G., Nádasdy Z., Csibra G., Biro S. Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition 1995, 56:165-193.
9. Itakura S., Ishida H., Kanda T., Lee K., Shimada Y., Ishiguro H. How to build an intentional android: Infants' imitation of a robot's goal-directed actions. Infancy 2008, 13:519-531.
10. Johnson S., Slaughter V., Carey S. Whose gaze will infants follow? The elicitation of gaze-following in 12-month-olds. Developmental Science 1998, 1:233-238.
11. Kilner J.M., Paulignan Y., Blakemore S.J. An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology 2003, 13:522-525.
12. Lee K.M., Park N., Song H. Can a robot be perceived as a developing creature?. Human Communication Research 2005, 31:538-563.
13. Luo Y., Baillargeon R. Can a self-propelled box have a goal? Psychological reasoning in 5-month-old infants. Psychological Science 2005, 16:601-608.
14. Meltzoff A.N. Understanding of the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology 1995, 31:838-850.
15. Minato, T., Shimada, M., Itakura., S., Lee, K., & Ishiguro, H. (2005). Does gaze reveal the human likeness of an android? In Proceedings of 2005 4th IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (pp. 106-111). Osaka, Japan: ICDL.
16. Moriguchi Y., Hiraki K. Neural origin of cognitive shifting in young children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106:6017-6021.
17. Moriguchi Y., Itakura S. Young children's difficulty with inhibitory control in a social context. Japanese Psychological Research 2008, 50:87-92.
18. Moriguchi Y., Kanda T., Ishiguro H., Itakura S. Children perseverate to a human's actions but not to a robot's actions. Developmental Science 2010, 13:62-68.
19. Moriguchi Y., Lee K., Itakura S. Social transmission of disinhibition in young children. Developmental Science 2007, 10:481-491.
20. Moriguchi Y., Sanefuji W., Itakura S. Disinhibition transmits from television to young children. Psychologia 2007, 50:308-318.
21. Premack D. The infant's theory of self-propelled objects. Cognition 1990, 36:1-16.
22. Shimizu Y.A., Johnson S.C. Infants' attribution of a goal to a morphologically unfamiliar agent. Developmental Science 2004, 7:425-430.
23. Woodward A.L. Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition 1998, 69:1-34.
24. Zelazo P.D., Frye D., Rapus T. An age-related dissociation between knowing rules and using them. Cognitive Development 1996, 11:37-63.
25. Zelazo P.D., Müller U. Executive function in typical and atypical development. Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development 2002, 445-469. Blackwell, Oxford, UK. U. Goswami (Ed.).