Efficient creation of multipartite entanglement in flux qubits

Nanotechnology

Volumn 21, Issue 27, 2010, Pages

  Ferber, J ^a,b   Wilhelm, F K ^b,c,d  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BELL INEQUALITIES; EIGENSTATES; ENTANGLEMENT AND QUANTUM NONLOCALITY; FLUX QUBITS; MULTIPARTITE ENTANGLEMENTS; SUPERCONDUCTING FLUX; TRIPARTITE ENTANGLEMENT; W-TYPES;

QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

EID: 77953992808     PISSN: 09574484     EISSN: 13616528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/21/27/274015     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Peres A 1993 Quantum Theory: Concept and Methods (Dordrecht: Kluwer)
2. Einstein A, Podolsky B and Rosen N 1935 Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47 777
3. Weihs G, Jennewein T, Simon C, Weinfurter H and Zeilinger A 1998 Violation of bell's inequality under strict einstein locality conditions Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 5039
4. Kim K, Chang M-S, Islam R, Korenbild S, Duan L-M and Monroe C 2009 Entanglement and tunable spin-spin couplings between trapped ions using multiple transverse modes Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 120502
5. Sackett C A, et al. 2000 Experimental entanglement of four particles Nature 404 256
6. Ansmann M, et al. 2009 Violation of bell's inequality in Josephson phase qubits Nature 461 504
7. Chow J M, DiCarlo L, Gambetta J M, Nunnenkamp A, Bishop L S, Frunzio L, Devoret M H, Girvin S M and Schoelkopf R J 2009 Entanglement metrology using a joint readout of superconducting qubits arXiv:0908.1955
8. Nielsen M A and Chuang I L 2000 Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
9. Horodecki R, Horodecki M and Horodecki K 2009 Quantum entanglement Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 865
10. Verstraete F, Porras D and Cirac J I 2004 Density matrix renormalization group and periodic boundary conditions: a quantum information perspective Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 227205
11. Werner R 1989 Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model Phys. Rev. A 40 4277
12. Wendin G and Shumeiko V S 2006 Handbook of Theoretical and Computational Nanotechnology (American Scientific Publishers) chapter (Stevenson Ranch, CA: Superconducting Quantum Circuits, Qubits and Computing)
13. Clarke J and Wilhelm F K 2008 Superconducting qubits Nature 453 1031
14. Greenberger D M, Horne M and Zeilinger A 1989 Going beyond Bell's theorem Bell's Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe (Berlin: Springer Verlag)
15. Mooij J E, Orlando T P, Levitov L, Tian L, van der Wal C H and Lloyd S 1999 Josephson persistent-current qubit Science 285 1036
16. Plantenberg J H, de Groot P C, Harmans C J P M and Mooij J E 2007 Demonstration of controlled-not quantum gates on a pair of superconducting quantum bits Nature 447 836-9
17. Orlando T P, Mooij J E, Tian L, van der Wal C H, Levitov L S, Lloyd S and Mazo J J 1999 Superconducting persistent-current qubit Phys. Rev. B 60 15398
18. Majer J B, Paauw F G, ter Haar A C J, Harmans C J P M and Mooij J E 2005 Spectroscopy on two coupled superconducting flux qubits Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 090501
19. Robertson T L, Plourde B L T, Reichardt P A, Hime T, Wu C-E and Clarke J 2006 Quantum theory of three-junction flux qubit with non-negligible loop inductance: towards scalability Phys. Rev. B 73 174526
20. Makhlin Yu, Schön G and Shnirman A 2001 Quantum-state engineering with Josephson-junction devices Rev. Mod. Phys. 73 357
21. Hime T, Reichardt P A, Plourde B L T, Robertson T L, Wu C-E, Ustinov A V and Clarke J 2006 Solid-state qubits with current-controlled coupling Science 314 1427
22. Paauw F G, Fedorov A, Harmans C J P M and Mooij J E 2009 Tuning the gap of a superconducting flux qubit Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 090501
23. Endrejat J and Büttner H 2005 Characterization of entanglement of more than two qubits with Bell inequalities and global entanglement Phys. Rev. A 71 012305
24. Peres A 1996 Separability criterion for density matrices Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 1413
25. Dür W, Vidal G and Cirac J I 2000 Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways Phys. Rev. A 62 062314
26. Terhal B M 2000 Bell inequalities and the separability criterion Phys. Lett. A 271 319
27. Lewenstein M, Kraus B, Cirac J I and Horodecki P 2000 Optimization of entanglement witnesses Phys. Rev. A 62 052310
28. Eisert J, Hyllus P, Gühne O and Curty M 2004 Complete hierarchies of efficient approximations to problems in entanglement theory Phys. Rev. A 70 062317
29. Brando F G S L 2005 Quantifying entanglement with witness operators Phys. Rev. A 72 022310
30. Acín A, Bru D, Lewenstein M and Sanpera A 2001 Classification of mixed three-qubit states Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 040401
31. Borennane M, Eibl M, Kurtsiefer C, Gaertner S, Weinfurter H, Gühne O, Hyllus P, Bru D, Lewenstein M and Sanpera A 2004 Experimental detection of multipartite entanglement using witness operators Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 087902
32. Coffman V, Kundu J and Wootters W K 2000 Distributed entanglement Phys. Rev. A 61 052306
33. Gühne O and Hyllus P 2003 Investigating three qubit entanglement with local measurements Int. J. Theor. Phys. 42 1001
34. Greenberger D M, Horne M A, Shimony A and Zeilinger A 1990 Bell's theorem without inequalities Am. J. Phys. 58 1131
35. David Mermin N 1990 Quantum mysteries revisited Am. J. Phys. 58 731
36. David Mermin N 1990 Extreme quantum entanglement in a superposition of macroscopically distinct states Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 1838
37. Klyshko D N 1993 The Bell and GHZ theorems: a possible three-photon interference experiment and the question of nonlocality Phys. Lett. A 172 399
38. Emary C and Beenakker C W J 2004 Relation between entanglement measures and Bell inequalities for three qubits Phys. Rev. A 69 032317
39. Clauser J F, Horne M A, Shimony A and Holt R A 1969 Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 880
40. Wallraff A, Schuster D I, Blais A, Frunzio L, Majer J, Devoret M H, Girvin S M and Schoelkopf R J 2005 Approaching unit visibility for control of a superconducting qubit with dispersive readout Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 060501
41. Storcz M J 2005 Decoherence, encoding and control of coupled solid-state quantum bits PhD Thesis LMU München
42. Lupascu A, Verwijs C J M, Schouten R N, Harmans C J P M and Mooij J E 2004 Nondestructive readout for a superconducting flux qubit Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 177006
43. Lupascu A, Harmans C J P M and Mooij J E 2005 Quantum state detection of a superconducting flux qubit using a dc-SQUID in the inductive mode Phys. Rev. B 71 184506
44. Siddiqi I, Vijay R, Pierre F, Wilson C M, Metcalfe M, Rigetti C, Frunzio L and Devoret M H 2004 RF-driven Josephson bifurcation amplifier for quantum measurement Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 20702
45. Astafiev O, Pashkin Yu A, Yamamoto T, Nakamura Y and Tsai J S 2004 Single-shot measurement of the Josephson charge qubit Phys. Rev. B 69 180507
46. Röthlisberger B, Lehmann J, Saraga D S, Traber P and Loss D 2008 Highly entangled ground states in tripartite qubit systems Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 100502
47. Galiautdinov A and Martinis J M 2008 Maximally entangling tripartite protocols for Josephson phase qubits Phys. Rev. A 78 010305(R)
48. Wei L F, Lui Y X and Nori F 2006 Generation and control of Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entanglement in superconducting circuits Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 246803
49. Matuso S, Ashab S, Fujii T, Nori F, Nagai K and Htakenaka N 2007 Generation of macroscopic entangled states in coupled superconducting phase qubits J. Phys. Soc. Japan 76 054802
50. Galiautdinov A, Coffey M W and Deiotte R 2009 Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger state protocols for fully connected qubit networks arXiv:0902.2225
51. Mariantoni M, Deppe F, Marx A, Gross R, Wilhelm F K and Solano E 2008 Two-resonator circuit quantum electrodynamics: a superconducting quantum switch Phys. Rev. B 78 104508
52. Wang Y-D, Chesi S, Loss D and Bruder C 2009 One-step multi-qubit ghz state generation in a circuit qed system arXiv:0911.1396
53. Lucero E, Hofheinz M, Ansmann M, Bialczak R C, Katz N, Neeley M, O'Connell A D, Wang H, Cleland A N and Martinis J M 2008 High-fidelity gates in a single Josephson qub Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 247001
54. Chow J M, Gambetta J M, Tornberg L, Koch J, Bishop L S, Houck A A, Johnson B R, Frunzio L, Girvin S M and Schoelkopf R J 2009 Randomized benchmarking and process tomography for gate errors in a solid-state qubit Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 090502