Relation between entanglement measures and Bell inequalities for three qubits

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2004, Pages

  Emary, C ^a   Beenakker, C W J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITEIT LEIDEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATORS; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); INTERFEROMETRY; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; VECTORS;

ENTANGLEMENT MONOTONE; INTERFEROMETRIC CIRCUIT; QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 2542463365     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.032317     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. J. S. Bell, Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.) 1, 195 (1964).
2. J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969).
3. N. Gisin, Phys. Lett. A 154, 201 (1991).
4. A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981).
5. W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
6. V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 61, 052306 (2000).
7. D. M. Greenberger, M. Horne, and A. Zeilinger, in Bell's Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe, edited by M. Kafatos (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989).
8. N. D. Mermin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1838 (1990).
9. V. Scarani and N. Gisin, J. Phys. A 34, 6043 (2001).
10. G. Svetlichny, Phys. Rev. D 35, 3066 (1987).
11. P. Mitchell, S. Popescu, and D. Roberts, quant-ph/0202009.
12. D. Collins, N. Gisin, S. Popescu, D. Roberts, and V. Scarani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 170405 (2002).
13. M. Seevinck and G. Svetlichny, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 060401 (2002).
14. W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A 62, 062314 (2000).
15. 2/16.
16. A. Acín, A. Andrianov, L. Costa, E. Jané, J. I. Latorre, and R. Tarrach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1560 (2000); A. Acín, A. Andrianov, E. Jané, and R. Tarrach, J. Phys. A 34, 6725 (2001).
17. A. Acín, A. Andrianov, L. Costa, E. Jané, J. I. Latorre, and R. Tarrach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1560 (2000); A. Acín, A. Andrianov, E. Jané, and R. Tarrach, J. Phys. A 34, 6725 (2001).
18. R. M. Gingrich, Phys. Rev. A 65, 052302 (2002).
19. A. Sudbery, J. Phys. A 34, 643 (2001).
20. 2. Both σ and σ′ are capable of distinguishing W states from separable states, and they are bound in the same way by the Bell inequalities. We focus on σ rather than σ′ because we have no proof that σ′ is an entanglement monotone.
21. M. Zukowski, Č. Brukner, W. Laskowski, and M. Wieśniak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 210402 (2002).
22. J.-L. Chen, C.-F. Wu, L. C. Kwek, and C. H. Oh, quant-ph/0311180.
23. J.-L. Chen, C.-F. Wu, L. C. Kwek, and C. H. Oh, quant-ph/0311180
24. A. Zeilinger, M. A. Horne, H. Weinfurter, and M. Zukowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3031 (1997); J.-W. Pan, D. Bouwmeester, M. Daniell, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Nature (London) 403, 515 (2000).
25. A. Zeilinger, M. A. Horne, H. Weinfurter, and M. Zukowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3031 (1997); J.-W. Pan, D. Bouwmeester, M. Daniell, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Nature (London) 403, 515 (2000).
26. C. W. J. Beenakker, C. Emary, and M. Kindermann, Phys. Rev. B (to be published).
27. S, as may be seen by evaluating ε and ε′ with a=b=c = (0,1,0), a′ =b′=c′ = (1,0,0).
28. H. A. Carteret, quant-ph/0309212.