Results of rapid bottom-up software process modeling

Software Process Improvement and Practice

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 265-278

  Brooks, Andrew ^a,b  

^a DECODE GENETICS   (Iceland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AKUREYRI   (Iceland)

Author keywords

Interviews; Rapid; Software process; Spearmint; Techniques

Indexed keywords

DECODING; DISEASES; DNA; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERSONNEL;

INTERVIEWS; RAPID; SOFTWARE PROCESS; SPEARMINT GRAPHICAL NOTATION;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 12344267168     PISSN: 10774866     EISSN: 10991670     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/spip.207     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Becker-Kornstaedt U. 2000. Knowledge elicitation for descriptive software process modelling. Workshop on Using Multidisciplinary Approaches in Empirical Software Engineering Research, Limerick, Ireland, 33-38. Colocated with ICSE'2000.
2. Becker-Kornstaedt U. 2001a. Descriptive software process modelling - how to deal with sensitive process information. Empirical Software Engineering 6: 353-367.
3. Becker-Kornstaedt U. 2001b. Towards systematic knowledge elicitation for descriptive software process modelling. Technical Report 036.01/E, Fraunhofer IESE,Sauerwiesen 6, D-67661, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
4. Becker-Kornstaedt U, Hamann D, Kempkens R, Røsch P, Verlage M, Webby R, Zettel J. 1999. Support for the process engineer - the Spearmint approach to software process definition and process guidance. In 11th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE'99 Proceedings), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1626, Springer-Verlag: Germany, 119-133.
5. Becker-Kornstaedt U, Hamann D, Verlage M. 1997. Descriptive modelling of software processes. Technical Report 045.97/E, Fraunhofer IESE Sauerwiesen 6, D-67661 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
6. Becker-Kornstaedt U, Neu H, HircheG. 2001. Software process technology transfer: using a formal process notation to capture a software process in industry. In 8th European Workshop on Software Process Technology (EWSPT 2001 Proceedings), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2077, Springer-Verlag: Germany, 63-76.
7. Beecham S, Hall T, Rainer A. 2003. Software process improvement problems in twelve software companies: an empirical analysis. Empirical Software Engineering 8(1): 7-42.
8. Briand L, Eman KE, Melo WL. 1995. AINSI An inductive method for software process improvement: concrete steps and guidelines. Technical Report CS-TR-3498 and UMIACS-TR-95-77, Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland: College Park, MD. Published in Proceedings of ESI-ISCN'95.
9. Herbsieb J, Zubrow D, Goldenson D, Hayes W, Quality S, Paulk M. 1997. Software quality and the Capability Maturity Model. Communications of the ACM 40(6): 30-40.
10. Hobday M, Brady T. 2000. A fast method for analysing and improving complex software processes. R&D Management 30(1): 1-22.
11. Krishnan MS, Mukhopadhyay T, Zubrow D. 1999. Software process models and project performance. Information Systems Frontiers 1(3): 267-277.
12. Scott L, Carvalho L, Jeffery R, D'Ambra J. 2001. An evaluation of the Spearmint approach to software process modelling. In 8th European Workshop on Software Process Technology (EWSPT 2001 Proceedings), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2077, Springer-Verlag: Germany, 77-89.
13. Seaman CB. 1999. Qualitative methods in empirical studies of software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 25(4): 557-572.
14. Webby R, Becker-Kornstaedt U. 1997. Towards a logical schema integrating software process modeling and software measurement. Workshop on Process Modelling and Empirical Studies of Software Evolution, Boston, MA, USA, 84-88. Colocated with ICSE'97.