Integration of on-the-fly kinetic reduction with multidimensional CFD

AIChE Journal

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1305-1314

  He, Kaiyuan ^a   Ierapetritou, Marianthi G ^a   Androulakis, Ioannis P ^a  

^a The State University of New Jersey   (United States)

Author keywords

CFD; Detailed kinetics; On the fly reduction

Indexed keywords

CFD CODES; CHEMKIN; COMBUSTION PRO-CESS; COMPLEX KINETICS; COMPUTATIONAL CELL; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS CODES; CPU TIME; CURRENT MODELS; DETAILED KINETICS; FLUX ANALYSIS; MECHANISM REDUCTION; ON-THE-FLY; REACTION MECHANISM; REACTIVE FLOW;

COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; FLUID DYNAMICS; IGNITION;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

EID: 77953946276     PISSN: 00011541     EISSN: 15475905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aic.12072     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Hirschfelder JO, Curtiss CF. In: Theory of propagation of flames. 3rd Symp. Comb, Flame and Explosion Phenomena, Baltimore: 1949;121.
2. Reynolds WC. The potential and limitations of direct and large eddy simulation. Lecture Notes in Physics. 1989;313.
3. Jones WP, Whitelaw JH. In: Modelling and measurement in turbulent combustion, 20th Symp Comb, Pittsburgh, 1985; Pittsburgh, PA: 1985;223.
4. Hou Z-X, Abraham J. Three-dimensional modeling of soot and NO in a direct-injection diesel engine. Society of Automotive Engineers Technical Paper 950608, 1995.
5. Patterson MA, Kong S-C, Hampson GJ, Reitz RD. Modeling the effects of fuel injection characteristics on diesel engine soot and NOx emissions. Society of Automotive Engineers Technical Paper 940523; 1994.
6. Scheimer GW, Strauss TS, Ritschder U. Combustion in a swirl chamber diesel engine simulation by computational fluid dynamics. Society of Automotive Engineers Technical Paper 950280; 1995.
7. Abraham J, Bracco FV. Fuel-air mixing and distribution in a directinjection stratified-charge rotary engine. Society of Automotive Engineers Technical Paper 890329, 1989.
8. Aceves SM, Flowers DL, Westbrook CL, Smith JR, Pitz W, Dibble R, Christensen M, Johansson B. A Multi-zone Model for Prediction of HCCI Combustion and Emissions. SAE paper 2000-01-0327; 2000.
9. Babajimopoulos A, Assanis DN, Flowers DL, Aceves SM, Hessel RP. In: A Fully Integrated CFD and Multi-zone Model with Detailed Chemical Kinetics for the Simulation of PCCI Engines. 15th International Multidimensional Engine Modeling Users' Group Meeting, 2005; Detroit, MI: 2005.
10. Marchese AJ, Dryer FL, Nayagam V. Numerical modeling of isolated n-alkane droplet flames: Initial comparisons with ground and space-based microgravity experiments. Combust Flame. 1999; 116(3):432-459.
11. Sirignano WA. Fluid-dynamics of sprays-1992 Freeman Scholar lecture. J Fluids Eng-Trans Asme. 1993;115(3):345-378.
12. Chiang CH, Raju MS, Sirignano WA. Numerical-analysis of convecting, vaporizing fuel droplet with variable properties. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 1992;35(5):1307-1324.
13. Mashayek F. Direct numerical simulations of evaporating droplet dispersion in forced low Mach number turbulence. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 1998;41(17):2601-2617.
14. Squires KD, Eaton JK. Measurements of particle dispersion obtained from direct numerical simulations of isotropic turbulence. J Fluid Mech. 1991;226:1-35.
15. Rumsey CL, Ying SX. Prediction of high lift: review of present CFD capability. Prog Aerosp Sci. 2002;38(2):145-180.
16. Amsden AA. KIVA-3V: A Block-Structured KIVA Program for Engines with Vertical or Canted Valves. Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-13313-MS, 1997.
17. Kong SC, Marriott CD, Reitz RD, Christensen M. Modeling and Experiments of HCCI Engine Combustion Using Detailed Chemical Kinetics with Multi-dimensional CFD. SAE paper 2001-01-1026; 2001.
18. Kong SC, Ayoub NA, Reitz RD. Modeling Combustion in Compression Ignition Homogeneous Charge Engines. SAE paper 920512, 1992.
19. Liang L, Stevens JG, Farrell JT. A dynamic adaptive chemistry scheme for reactive flow computations. Proc Combust Inst. 2009; 32:527-534.
20. Liang L, Kong SC, Jung C, Reitz RD. Development of a semiimplicit solver for detailed chemistry in internal combustion engine simulations. J Eng Gas Turbines Power. 2007;129(1):271-278.
21. Tones SR, Moriarty NW, Frenklach M, Brown NJ. Computational economy improvements in PRISM. Int J Chem Kinetics. 2003; 35(9):438-452.
22. Turanyi T. Reduction of large reaction mechanisms. New J Chem. 1990;14:795-803.
23. Rabitz H, Kramer M, Dacol D. Sensitivity analysis in chemical kinetics. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 1983;34:419-461.
24. Chen JY. A general procedure for constructing reduced reaction mechanisms with given independent reactions. Combust Sci Tech. 1988;57:89-94.
25. Peters N. In: Systematic reduction of flame kinetics - Principles and details. 11th International Colloquium on Dynamics of Explosions and Reactive Systems; 1988: Warsaw, Poland. 1988;67-86.
26. Mass U, Pope SB. Simplifying chemical kinetics: Intrinsic low dimensional manifold in composition space. Combusti Flame. 1992; 88:239-264.
27. Lam SH, Goussis DA. The Csp method for simplifying kinetics. Int J Chem Kinetics. 1994;26(4):461-486.
28. Lu TF, Ju YG, Law CK. Complex CSP for chemistry reduction and analysis. Combust Flame. 2001;126(1-2):1445-1455.
29. Lu TF, Law CK. A directed relation graph method for mechanism reduction. Proc Combust Inst. 2005;30:1333-1341.
30. Lu TF, Law CK. Linear time reduction of large kinetic mechanisms with directed relation graph: n-Heptane and iso-octane. Combust Flame. 2006;144(1-2):24-36.
31. Lu TF, Law CK. On the applicability of directed relation graphs to the reduction of reaction mechanisms. Combust Flame. 2006;146(3): 472-483.
32. Androulakis IP. Kinetic mechanism reduction based on an integer programming approach. AIChE J. 2000;46(2):361-371.
33. Bhattacharjee B, Schwer DA, Barton PI, Green WH. Optimallyreduced kinetic models: reaction elimination in large-scale kinetic mechanisms. Combust Flame. 2003;135(3):191-208.
34. Petzold L, Zhu WJ. Model reduction for chemical kinetics: An optimization approach. AIChE J. 1999;45(4):869-886.
35. Androulakis IP, Grenda JM, Bozzelli JW. Time-integrated pointers for enabling the analysis of detailed reaction mechanisms. >AIChE J. 2004;50(11):2956-2970.
36. Pope SB. Computationally efficient implementation of combustion chemistry using in situ adaptive tabulation. Combust Theor Model. 1997;1(1):41-63.
37. Androulakis IP. "Store and retrieve" representations of dynamic systems motivated by studies in gas phase chemical kinetics. Comput Chem Eng. 2004;28(11):2141-2155.
38. Banerjee I, Ierapetritou MG. Development of an adaptive chemistry model considering micromixing effects. Chem Eng Sci. 2003;58(20): 4537-4555.
39. Schwer DA, Lu PS, Green WH. An adaptive chemistry approach to modeling complex kinetics in reacting flows. Combust Flame. 2003; 133(4):451-465.
40. He K, Ierapetritou MG, Androulakis IP. A graph-based approach to developing adaptive representations of complex reaction mechanisms. Combust Flame. 2008;155(4):585-604.
41. Revel J, Boettner JC, Cathonnet M, Bachman JS. Derivation of a global chemical kinetic mechanism for methane ignition and combustion. J Chim Phys Phys-Chim Biol. 1994;91(4):365-382.
42. Curran HJ, Gaffuri P, Pitz WJ, Westbrook CK. A comprehensive modeling study of n-heptane oxidation. Combust Flame. 1998; 114(1-2):149-177.
43. Kong SC, Reitz RD. Numerical study of premixed HCCI engine combustion and its sensitivity to computational mesh and model uncertainties. Combust Theor Model. 2003;7(2):417-433.
44. Kong SC, Reitz RD. Application of detailed chemistry and CFD for predicting direct injection HCCI engine combustion and emissions. Proc Combust Inst. 2003;29:663-669.