Optimally-reduced kinetic models: Reaction elimination in large-scale kinetic mechanisms

Combustion and Flame

Volumn 135, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 191-208

  Bhattacharjee, Binita ^a   Schwer, Douglas A ^a   Barton, Paul I ^a   Green, William H ^a  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive chemistry; Global optimality; Integer programming; Model reduction; Reaction elimination

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COSTS; FLAME RESEARCH; FUEL BURNERS; HEPTANE; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; METHANE; REACTION KINETICS;

REACTION ELIMINATION PROCESSES;

COMBUSTION;

HEPTANE;

KINETIC THEORY;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; COMBUSTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COST; ELIMINATION REACTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KINETICS; LAMINAR FLOW; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0242391224     PISSN: 00102180     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-2180(03)00159-7     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Maas U., Pope S.B. Simplifying chemical kinetics Intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds in chemical composition space, Combust. Flame. 88:1992;239-264.
2. Schwer D.A., Tolsma J.E., Green W.H., Barton P.I. On upgrading the numerics in combustion chemistry codes, Combust. Flame. 128:2002;270-291.
3. Tonse S.R., Moriarty N.W., Brown N.J., Frenklach M. PRISM Piecewise reusable implementation of solution mapping. An economical strategy for chemical kinetics, Isr . J. Chem. 39:1999;97-106.
4. Pope S.B., Yang B. Treating chemistry in combustion with detailed mechanisms-in situ adaptive tabulation in principal directions, Combust. Flame. 112:1998;85-112.
5. Shah J.J., Fox R.O. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of chemical reactors Application of in situ adaptive tabulation to methane thermochlorination chemistry, Ind . Eng. Chem. Res. 38:1999;4200-4212.
6. D.A. Schwer, P. Lu, W.H. Green, Adaptive chemistry approach to modeling complex kinetics in reacting flows, Combust. Flame 33 (2003) 451-465.
7. Okino M.S., Mavrovouniotis M.L. Simplification of mathematical models of chemical reaction systems. Chem. Rev. 98:1998;391-408.
8. Turanyi T. Reduction of large reaction mechanisms. New J. Chem. 14:1990;795-803.
9. A. Tomlin, T. Turanyi, M. Pilling, Mathematical tools for the construction, investigation and reduction of combustion mechanisms. In: M. Pilling, G. Hancock editors. Low temperature combustion and autoignition, Elsevier, 1997, pp. 293-437.
10. Androulakis I.P. Mechanism reduction based on an integer programming approach. AIChE J. 46:2000;361-371.
11. Zhu W., Petzold L.R. Model reduction for chemical kinetics an optimization approach . AIChE J. 45:1999;869-886.
12. Edwards K., Edgar T.F., Manousiouthakis V.I. Kinetic model reduction using genetic algorithms. Comput. Chem. Eng. 22:1998;239-246.
13. Edwards K., Edgar T.F., Manousiouthakis V.I. Reaction mechanism simplification using mixed-integer nonlinear programming. Comput. Chem. Eng. 24:2000;67-79.
14. Vajda S., Valko P., Turanyi T. Principal component analysis of kinetic models. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 17:1985;55-81.
15. Frenklach M., Wang H. Detailed reduction of reaction mechanisms for flame modeling, Combust. Flame. 87:1991;365-370.
16. Turanyi T., Berces T., Vajda S. Reaction rate analysis of complex kinetics systems. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 21:1989;83-99.
17. G.P. Smith, D.M. Golden, M. Frenklach, N.W. Moriarty, B. Eiteneer, M. Goldenberg, C.T. Bowman, R.K. Hanson, S. Song, W.C. Gardiner, Jr., V.V. Lissianski, Z. Qin, http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri-mech/.
18. Curran H.J., Gaffuri P., Pitz W.J., Westbrook C.K. A comprehensive modeling study of n-heptane oxidation, Combust. Flame. 114:1998;149-177. http://www-cms.llnl.gov/combustion/combustion2.html.
19. Brown P.N., Byrne G.D., Hindmarsh A.C. VODE A variable coefficient ODE solver . SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput. 10:1989;1038-1051.
20. Klinke D., Broadbelt L.J. Mechanism reduction during computer generation of compact reaction models. AIChE J. 43:1997;1828-1837.
21. Sirdeshpande A.R., Ierapetritou M.G., Androulakis I.P. Design of flexible reduced kinetic mechanisms. AIChE J. 47:2001;2461-2473.
22. ILOG S.A., ILOG CPLEX 7.0 User's Manual (2000).
23. C.A. Floudas, Nonlinear and Mixed-Integer Programming, Oxford University Press, 1995.
24. Balas E., Ceria S., Cornuejols G., Natraj N. Gomory cuts revisited. Oper. Res. Lett. 19:1996;1-9.
25. Balas E., Ceria S., Cornuejols G. Mixed 0-1 programming by lift and project in a branch and bound framework. Manage. Sci. 42:1996;1229-1246.
26. Tolsma J.E., Barton P.I. DAEPACK An open modeling environment for legacy codes . Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 39:2000;1826-1839.
27. Feehery W.F., Tolsma J.E., Barton P.I. Efficient sensitivity analysis of large- scale differential-algebraic systems. Appl. Numer. Math. 25:1997;41-54.
28. R.J. Kee, F.M. Rupley, J.A. Miller, CHEMKIN II: A FORTRAN chemical kinetics package for the analysis of gas-phase chemical kinetics, Tech. Rep. SAND89-8009, Sandia National Laboratories (1990).
29. T. Turanyi, MECHMOD: Software Aid to the Development of Reaction Mechanisms, http://www.chem.leeds.ac.uk/Combustion/Combustion.html.
30. N.J. Brown, G. Li, M.L. Koszykowski, Mechanism reduction via principal component analysis, Int. J. Chem. Kinet. (1997) 393-414.
31. A.E. Lutz, R.J. Kee, J.A. Miller, SENKIN: A FORTRAN program for predicting homogenous gas phase chemical kinetics with sensitivity analysis, Tech. Rep. SAND87-8248, Sandia National Laboratories (1988).
32. T. Turanyi, KINALC: Kinetic Analysis of Reaction Systems, http://www.chem.leeds.ac.uk/Combustion/Combustion.html.
33. D. Schwer, P. Lu, W.H. Green, V. Semiao, A consistent-splitting approach to computing stiff steady-state reacting flows with adaptive chemistry, Combust. Theory Modelling. 7 (2003) 383-399.
34. Song J., Stephanopoulos G., Green W.H. Valid parameter range analyses for chemical reaction kinetic models. Chem. Eng. Sci. 57:2002;4475-4491.