Seeing through a different lens: What do interns learn when they make video cases of their own teaching?

Teacher Educator

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-22

  Rosaen, Cheryl L ^a   Lundeberg, Mary ^a   Terpstra, Marjorie ^b   Cooper, Marjorie ^a   Fu, Jing ^a   Niu, Rui ^c  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CALVIN COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SCRANTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953945928     PISSN: 08878730     EISSN: 19388101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08878730903386849     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Almasi, J. (1996). A new view of discussion. In L. B. Gambrell & J. Almasi (Eds.), Lively discussions! Fostering engaged reading (pp. 2-24). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
2. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1993). Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication, 10(4), 475-509.
3. Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 417-436.
4. Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1998). Professional development and reform-based teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 1-3.
5. Brophy, J. (Ed.). (2004). Using video in teacher education, Advances in research on teaching, Volume 10. Boston, MA: Elsevier.
6. Calandra, B., Gurvitch, R., & Lund, J. (2008). An exploratory study of digital video editing as a tool for teacher preparation. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(2), 137-153.
7. Carter, K. (1999). What is a case? What is not a case? In M. A. Lundeberg, B. B. Levin, & H. L. Harrington (Eds.), Who learns what from cases and how? (pp. 165-175). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
9. Chapman, M. L. (1999). Situated, social, active: Rewriting genre in the elementary classroom. Written Communication, 16(4), 469-490.
10. Cooper, C. R. (1999). What we know about genres, and how it can help us assign and evaluate writing. In C. R. Cooper & L. O'Dell (Eds.), Evaluating writing: The role of teachers' knowledge about text, learning and culture (pp. 23-52). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
11. Cisneros, S. (1984). The house on Mango Street. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
12. Dumas, A. (1888). The Count of Monte Cristo. London and New York: George Routledge and Sons.
13. Gambrell, L. B., & Almasi, J. F. (Eds.). (1996). Lively discussions! Fostering engaged reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
14. Grossman, P. (2005). Pedagogical approaches to teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 425-476). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Harford, J., & MacRuairc, G. (2008). Engaging student teachers in meaningful reflective practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1884-1892.
16. Hess, D. E. (2004). Using video to create a vision for powerful discussion teaching in secondary social studies. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education (pp. 53-72). Boston, MA: Elsevier.
17. Hewitt, J., Pedretti, E., Bencze, L., Vaillancourt, D., & Yoon, S. (2003). New applications for multimedia cases: Promoting reflective practice in preservice teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(4), 483-500.
18. Lacey, C., & Merseth, K. (1993). Cases, hypermedia, and computer networks: Three curricular innovations for teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(6), 543-551.
19. Lampert, M., & Ball, D. (1998). Teaching multimedia: Investigations of real practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Larson, P. M. (1951). Discussion-A basic procedure in English. The English Journal, 40(7), 379-382.
21. Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. New York: Routledge-Falmer.
23. McGee, L. M. (1996). Response-centered talk: Windows on children's thinking. In L. B. Gambrell & J. F. Almasi (Eds.), Lively discussions! Fostering engaged reading (pp. 194-207). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
24. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Noah, P. A. (1996). Mob rule and the teaching of literature. English Journal, 85(4), 16-18.
26. Perry, G., & Talley, S. (2001). Online video case studies and teacher education: A new tool for preservice teacher education. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 17(4), 26-31.
27. Romano, M., & Schwartz, J. (2005). Exploring technology as a tool for eliciting and encouraging beginning teacher reflection. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(2), 149-168.
28. Rosaen, C. L., Degnan, C., VanStratt, T., & Zietlow, K. (2004). Designing a virtual K-12 classroom literacy tour: Learning together as teachers explore "best practice. " In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching, volume 10: Using video in teacher education (pp. 169-199). New York: Elsevier Science.
29. Rosaen, C. L., Lundeberg, M., Cooper, M., Fritzen, A., & Terpstra, M. (2008). Noticing noticing: How does investigation of video records of practice change how teachers reflect on their experience? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 347-360.
30. Rosaen, C. L., Lundeberg, M., Cooper, M., Fritzen, A., & Terpstra, M. (in press). Interns' use of video cases to problematize their practice: Crash, burn and (maybe) learn. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education.
31. Rosaen, C., Lundeberg, M., Cooper, M., Terpstra, M., Niu, R., & Fu, J. (2007). Subject matter matters: How does video case construction help novices learn to facilitate discussions in science and literacy? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, Austin, TX.
32. Rosenblatt, L. (1938/1995). Literature as exploration (5th ed.). New York: Modern Language Association.
33. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
34. Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. (2005). Using video to support teachers' ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 475-491.
35. Spiro, R. J., & Jehng, J. (1990). Cognitive flexibility theory and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 163-205). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. van Es, E., & Sherin, M. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers' interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571-596.
37. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Wang, J., & Hartley, K. (2003). Video technology as a support for teacher education reform. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(1), 105-138.
40. Wells, G., & Arauz, R. M. (2006). Dialogue in the classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 379-428.
41. Yerrick, R., Ross, D., & Molebash, P. (2005). Too close for comfort: Real-time science teaching reflections via digital video editing. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(4), 351-375.
42. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.