Multitrait-multimethod change modelling

AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis

Volumn 94, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 185-201

  Geiser, Christian ^a   Eid, Michael ^b   Nussbeck, Fridtjof W ^c   Courvoisier, Delphine S ^d   Cole, David A ^e  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^e VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Convergent and discriminant validity; Latent change analysis; Latent difference models; Longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis; Multitrait multimethod multioccasion analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953916315     PISSN: 18638171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10182-010-0127-0     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Akaike, H.: A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr. 19, 716-723 (1974).
2. Arbuckle, J. L.: Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In: Marcoulides, G. A., Schumacker, R. E. (eds.) Advanced Structural Equation Modeling, pp. 243-277. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1996).
3. Bentler, P. M.: Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol. Bull. 107, 238-246 (1990).
4. Bollen, K. A.: Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley, New York (1989).
5. Burns, G. L., Haynes, S. N.: Clinical psychology: construct validation with multiple sources of information and multiple settings. In: Eid, M., Diener, E. (eds.) Handbook of Multimethod Measurement in Psychology, pp. 401-418. American Psychological Association, Washington (2006).
6. Burns, G. L., Walsh, J. A., Gomez, R.: Convergent and discriminant validity of trait and source effects in ADHD-Inattention and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity measures across a 3-month interval. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 15, 529-541 (2003).
7. Campbell, D. T., Fiske, D. W.: Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol. Bull. 56, 81-105 (1959).
8. Cole, D. A., Maxwell, S. E.: Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: questions and tips in the use of structural equation modelling. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 112, 558-577 (2003).
9. Cole, D. A., Martin, J. M., Peeke, L., Henderson, A., Harwell, J.: Validation of depression and anxiety measures in white and black youths: multitrait-multimethod analyses. Psychol. Assess. 10, 261-276 (1998).
10. Courvoisier, D. S.: Unfolding the constituents of psychological scores: development and application of mixture and multitrait-multimethod LST models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
11. Courvoisier, D. S., Nussbeck, F. W., Eid, M., Geiser, C., Cole, D. A.: Analysing the convergent validity of states and traits: development and application of multimethod latent state-trait models. Psychol. Assess. 20, 270-280 (2008).
12. Cudeck, R.: Multiplicative models and MTMM matrices. J. Educ. Stat. 13, 131-147 (1988).
13. Eid, M.: A multitrait-multimethod model with minimal assumptions. Psychometrika 65, 241-261 (2000).
14. Eid, M., Diener, E.: Handbook of Multimethod Measurement in Psychology. American Psychological Association, Washington (2006).
15. Eid, M., Schneider, C., Schwenkmezger, P.: Do you feel better or worse? The validity of perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits. Eur. J. Pers. 13, 283-306 (1999).
16. Eid, M., Lischetzke, T., Nussbeck, F. W., Trierweiler, L. I.: Separating trait effects from trait-specific method effects in multitrait-multimethod models: a multiple indicator CT-C(M-1) model. Psychol. Methods 8, 38-60 (2003).
17. Eid, M., Lischetzke, T., Nussbeck, F. W.: Structural equation models for multitrait-multimethod data. In: Eid, M., Diener, E. (eds.) Handbook of Multimethod Measurement in Psychology, pp. 283-299. American Psychological Association, Washington (2006).
18. Eid, M., Nussbeck, F. W., Geiser, C., Cole, D. A., Gollwitzer, M., Lischetzke, T.: Structural equation modelling of multitrait-multimethod data: different models for different types of methods. Psychol. Methods 13, 230-253 (2008).
19. Geiser, C.: Multitrait-Multimethod-Multioccasion Modeling. AVM, München (2009).
20. Geiser, C., Eid, M., Nussbeck, F. W.: On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: a comment on Maydeu-Olivares & Coffman (2006). Psychol. Methods 13, 49-57 (2008).
21. Geiser, C., Eid, M., Nussbeck, F. W., Courvoisier, D. S., Cole, D. A.: Analysing true change in longitudinal multitrait-multimethod studies: application of a multimethod change model to depression and anxiety in children. Dev. Psychol. 46, 29-45 (2010).
22. Grimm, K. J., Pianta, R. C., Konold, T.: Longitudinal multitrait-multimethod models for developmental research. Multivar. Behav. Res. 44, 233-258 (2009).
23. Jöreskog, K. G.: Statistical models and methods for analysis of longitudinal data. In: Jöreskog, K. G., Sörbom, D. (eds.) Advances in Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Models, pp. 129-169. Abt., Cambridge (1979).
24. Julian, M. W.: The consequences of ignoring multilevel data structures in nonhierarchical covariance modelling. Struct. Equ. Model. 8, 325-352 (2001).
25. King-Kallimanis, B. L., Oort, F. J., Garst, G. J. A.: Using structural equation modelling to detect measurement bias and response shift in longitudinal data. Arch. Stat. Anal. (2010).
26. Kovacs, M.: The Children's Depression Inventory (CDI). Psychopharmacol. Bull. 21, 995-998 (1985).
27. Lance, C. E., Noble, C. L., Scullen, S. E.: A critique of the correlated trait-correlated method and correlated uniqueness models for multitrait-multimethod data. Psychol. Methods 7, 228-244 (2002).
28. Little, R. J. A., Rubin, D. B.: Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Wiley, New York (2003).
29. Marsh, H. W.: Multitrait-multimethod analyses: inferring each trait/method combination with multiple indicators. Appl. Meas. Educ. 6, 49-81 (1993).
30. Marsh, H. W., Hocevar, D.: A new, more powerful approach to multitrait-multimethod analyses: application of second-order confirmatory factor analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 73, 107-117 (1988).
31. McArdle, J. J.: Dynamic but structural equation modelling of repeated measures data. In: Cattell, R. B., Nesselroade, J. (eds.) Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology, pp. 561-614. Plenum, New York (1988).
32. Muthén, L. K., Muthén, B. O.: Mplus User's Guide, 5th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles (1998-2007).
33. Muthén, B. O., Satorra, A.: Complex sample data in structural equation modelling. In: Marsden, P. V. (ed.) Sociological Methodology, pp. 267-316, American Sociological Association, Washington (1995).
34. Oort, F. J.: Three-mode models for multitrait-multimethod data. Methodology 5, 78-87 (2009).
35. Pohl, S., Steyer, R.: Modeling method effects as individual causal effects. J. R. Stat. Soc. A Stat. 171, 41-63 (2008).
36. Raffalovich, L. E., Bohrnstedt, G. W.: Common, specific, and error variance components of factor models: estimation with longitudinal data. Sociol. Methods Res. 15, 385-405 (1987).
37. Reynolds, C. R., Richmond, B. O.: What I think and feel: a revised measure of children's manifest anxiety. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 6, 271-280 (1978).
38. Satorra, A., Bentler, P. M.: A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. UCLA Department of Statistics. http://preprints. stat. ucla. edu/260/chisquare. pdf (1999). Accessed 8 January 2007.
39. Schafer, J. L., Graham, J. W.: Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol. Methods 7, 147-177 (2002).
40. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., Müller, H.: Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: test of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol. Res. Online 8, 23-74 (2003).
41. Scherpenzeel, A., Saris, W. E.: Multitrait-multimethod models for longitudinal research. In: van Montfort, K., Satorra, A., Oud, H. (eds.) Longitudinal Models in the Behavioral and Related Sciences, pp. 381-401. Erlbaum, New York (2007).
42. Sörbom, D.: Detection of correlated errors in longitudinal data. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 28, 138-151 (1975).
43. Steiger, J. H.: Structural model evaluation and modification: an interval estimation approach. Multivar. Behav. Res. 25, 173-180 (1990).
44. Steyer, R., Eid, M., Schwenkmezger, P.: Modeling true intraindividual change: true change as a latent variable. Methods Psychol. Res. Online 2, 21-33 (1997).
45. Steyer, R., Partchev, I., Shanahan, M.: Modeling true intra-individual change in structural equation models: the case of poverty and children's psychosocial adjustment. In: Little, T. D., Schnabel, K. U., Baumert, J. (eds.) Modeling Longitudinal and Multiple-Group Data: Practical Issues, Applied Approaches, and Specific Examples, pp. 109-126. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (2000).
46. Vautier, S.: A longitudinal SEM approach to STAI data: two comprehensive multitrait-multistate models. J. Pers. Assess. 83, 167-179 (2004).
47. Vautier, S., Steyer, R., Boomsma, A.: The true-change model with individual method effects: reliability issues. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 61, 379-399 (2008).
48. Widaman, K. F., Reise, S. P.: Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: applications in the substance use domain. In: Bryant, K. J., Windle, M., West, S. G. (eds.) The Science of Prevention: Methodological Advances from Alcohol and Substance Abuse Research, pp. 281-324. American Psychological Association, Washington (1997).
49. Wothke, W.: Longitudinal and multi-group modelling with missing data. In: Little, T. D., Schnabel, K. U., Baumert, J. (eds.) Modeling Longitudinal and Multilevel Data: Practical Issues, Applied Approaches, and Specific Examples, pp. 219-240. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (2000).