Multitrait-Multimethod Models for Longitudinal Research

Longitudinal Models in the Behavioral and Related Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 381-401

  Scherpenzeel, Annette ^a   Saris, Willem E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145117039     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315091655-16     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Andrews, F. M. (1984). Construct validity and error components of survey measures: A structural modelling approach. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 409-422.
2. Billiet J., Loosveldt, G. and Waterplas, L. (1986). Het survey-interview onder-zocht: Effecten van het onderwerp en gebruik van vragenlijsten op de kwaliteit van antwoorden. Leuven: Sociologisch Onderzoeksinstituut K.U.Leuven.
3. Bizer, G. Y., Visser, P. S., Berent, M. K., and Krosnick, J. (2004). Importance, knowledge and accessobility: Exploring the dimensionality of strength-related attitude properties. In W. E. Saris and P. S. Sniderman (Eds.), Studies in public opinion (pp. 215-242). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Campbell, D. T., and Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multimethod-multitrait matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 833-853.
5. Coenders, G., and Saris, W. E. (1995). Categorization and measurement quality. The choice between Pearson and Polychoric correlations. In W. E. Saris and A. Münnich (Eds.), The multitrait-multimethod approach to evaluate measurement instruments (pp. 125-144). Budapest: Eötvös University Press.
6. Converse P. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. A. Ap-ter (Ed.) Ideology and dicontent (pp. 206-261). New York, Free Press.
7. Corten I., Saris, W.E., Coenders, G., Van der Veld, W., Aalbers, W., and Kornelis, C. (2002). Fit of different models for multitrait-multimethod experiments. Structural Equation models, 9, 213-233.
8. De Wit, H., and Billiet, J. (1995). The MTMM design: back to the Founding Fathers. In W.E. Saris and A. Münnich (Eds.) The multitrait-multimethod approach to evaluate measurement instruments (pp. 39-59). Budapest: Eötvös University Press.
9. Eid, M., Lischetzke, T., Nussbeck, F. W., and Trierweiler, L. I. (2003). Separating trait effects from trait-specific method effects in multitrait-multimethod models: A multiple indicator CTC(M-l) model. Psychological Methods, 8, 38-60.
10. Heise, D. R., and Bohrnstedt, G. W. (1970). Validity, invalidity and reliability. In E. F. Borgatta and G. W. Bohrnstedt (Eds.). Sociological methodology (pp. 104-129). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11. Jöreskog, K.G., and Sörbom, D. (1988). Prelis: a program for multivariate data screening and data summarization. (2nd ed.). Mooresville: Scientific Software.
12. Jöreskog, K.G., and Sörbom, D. (1989). Lisrel VII: Users reference guide. Mooresville: Scientific Software.
13. Költringer, R. (1995a). Categorization and measurement quality: A population study using artificial multitrait-multimethod data. In W. E. Saris and A. Münnich (Eds.), The multitrait-multimethods approach to evaluate measurement instruments (pp. 103-124). Budapest: Eötvös University Press.
14. Költringer, R. (1995b). Measurement quality in Austrian personal interview surveys. In W. E. Saris and A. Münnich (Eds.) The multitrait-multimethods approach to evaluate measurement instruments (pp. 207-225). Budapest: Eötvös University Press.
15. Lord, E., and Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16. Rindskopf, D. (1984). Structural equation models: Empirical identification, Heywood cases, and related problems. Sociological Methods and Research, 13, 109-119.
17. Saris, W.E. (1990). The choice of a research design for MTMM studies. In W. E. Saris and A. van Meurs (Eds.), Evaluation of measurement instruments by meta-analysis of multitrait-multimethod studies (pp. 160-167). Amsterdam: North Holland.
18. Saris, W. E., and Andrews, F. M. (1991). Evaluation of measurement instruments using a structural modelling approach. In P. P. Biemer. R. M. Groves, L. E. Lyberg, N. Mathiowetz and S. Sudman, (Eds.). Measurement errors in surveys (pp. 575-597). New York: Wiley.
19. Saris, W. E. and Münnich, A. (1995) The multitrait-multimethod approach to evaluate measurement instruments. Budapest: Eötvös University Press.
20. Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., and Coenders, G. (2004). A new approach to evaluating the quality of measurment instruments: The split ballot MTMM design. Sociological Methodology, 4, 311-347.
21. Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., and Sörbom, D. (1987). The detection and correction of specification errors in structural equation models. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.). Sociological methodology (pp. 105-129). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
22. Saris, W. E., and Sniderman, P. S. (2004). Studies in public opinion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23. Saris W.E., Van Wijk, T., and Scherpenzeel, A. (1998). Validity and reliability of subjective social indicators: The effect of different measures of association. Social Indicators Research, 45, 173-199.
24. Scherpenzeel, A. (2001). Mode effects in panel surveys: A comparison of CAPI and CATI. Actualités OFS, order no. 448-0100, Neuchatel: Swiss Federal Statistical Office.
25. Scherpenzeel, A., and Saris, W. E. (1997). The validity and reliability of survey questions: A meta-analysis of MTMM studies. Sociological Methods and Research, 25, 341-383.
26. Steyer R., and Schmitt, M. J. (1990). Latent state-trait models in attitude research. Quality and Quantity, 24, 427-445
27. Steyer, R., Schmitt, M. and Eid, M. (1999). Latent state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13, 389-408.
28. Steyer, R., Krambeer, S. and Hannöver, W. (2004). Modeling Latent Trait-Change. In K. Van Montfort, H. Oud and A. Satorra (eds.), Recent developments on structural equation modeling: Theory and applications (pp. 337-357). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
29. Van Meurs, A., and Saris, W. E. (1990). Memory effects in MTMM studies. In W. E. Saris and A. van Meurs (Eds.), Evaluation of measurement instruments by meta-analysis of multitrait-multimethod studies (pp. 134-146). Amsterdam: North Holland.
30. Van der Veld, W., and Saris, W. E. (2004). Separation of error, method effect instability and attitude strength. In W. E. Saris and P. S. Sniderman (eds.), Studies in public opinion (pp. 37-63). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.