Many eyes on nature: Diverse perspectives in the cape horn biosphere reserve and their relevance for conservation

Ecology and Society

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Berghoefer, Uta ^a   Rozzi, Ricardo ^b,c   Jax, Kurt ^a  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DE MAGALLANES   (Chile)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Biosphere reserve; Chile; Conflicts; Conservation; Local ecological knowledge; Participation; Protected areas; Valuation

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COMPLEXITY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION PLANNING; HEURISTICS; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; NATURE CONSERVATION; NATURE RESERVE; TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE; VALUATION;

CAPE HORN BIOSPHERE RESERVE; CHILE; MAGALLANES;

EID: 77953802539     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-03316-150118     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. Adams, W. M. 2004. Against extinction; the story of conservation. Earthscan, London, UK.
2. Adams, W. M., R. Aveling, D. Brockington, B. Dickson, J. Elliott, J. Hutton, D. Roe, B. Vira, and W. Wolmer. 2004. Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science 306:1146-1149.
3. Adams, W. M., and J. Hutton. 2007. People, parks and poverty: political ecology and iodiversity conservation. Conservation and Society 5 (2):147-183.
4. Agrawal, A. 1995. Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change 26(3):413-439.
5. Agrawal, A. 2005. Environmentality; technologies of government and the making of subjects. Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
6. Agrawal, A., and C. C. Gibson. 1999. Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development 27(4):629-649.
7. Agrawal, A., and K. Redford. 2009. Conservation and displacement: an overview. Conservation and Society 7(1):1-10.
8. Arango, X., R. Rozzi, F. Massardo, C. B. Anderson, and T. Ibarra. 2007. Descubrimiento e implementación del pájaro carpintero gigante (Campephilus magellanicus) como especie carismática: una aproximación biocultural para la conservación en la Reserva de Biosfera Cabo de Hornos. Magallania 35(2):71-88.
9. Arcese, P., and A. R. E. Sinclair. 1997. The role of protected areas as ecological baselines. Journal of Wildlife Management 61(3):587-602.
10. Atran, S., D. Medin, N. Ross, E. Lynch, V. Vapnarsky, E. Ucan Ek', J. Coley, C. Timura, and M. Baran. 2002. Folk ecology, cultural epidemiology, and the spirit of the commons. Current Anthropology 43(3):421-450.
11. Becker, E., and T. Jahn. 2005. Societal relations to nature; outline of a critical theory in the ecological crisis. [online] URL: http://www.isoe.de/ftp/darmstadttext_engl.pdf.
12. Becker, E., and T. Jahn. 2006. Soziale Ökologie; Grundzuge einer Wissenschaft von den gesellschaftlichen Naturverhdltnissen. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt, Germany.
13. Berghöfer, U. 2002. Zur Partizipation der lokalen Bevölkerung bei der Implementierung der Biodiversitätskonvention-Das Beispiel des geplanten Biosphärenreservates Cabo de Hornos (Südchile). Thesis. Institute of Geography, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
14. Berghöfer, U., and A. Berghöfer. 2006. 'Participation' in development thinking; coming to grips with a truism and its critiques. Pages 79-116 in S. Stoll-Kleemann and M. Welp, editors. Stakeholder dialogues in natural resources management; theory andpractice. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
15. Berkes, F. 2004. Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology 18(3):621-630.
16. Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10 (5):1251-1262.
17. Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Pimbert, M., Farver, M. T., Kothari, A., and Y. Renard. 2004. Sharing power; learning by doing in co-management of natural resources throughout the world. Cenesta, Tehran, Iran.
18. Braun, B., and Castree, N. 1998. Remaking reality; nature at the millennium. Routledge, New York, New York, USA.
19. Briggs, J. 2005. The use of indigenous knowledge in development: problems and challenges. Progress in Development Studies 5(2):99-114.
20. Briggs, J., and J. Sharp. 2004. Indigenous knowledges and development: a post-colonial caution. Third World Quarterly 25(4):661-676.
21. Brockington, D., and J. Igoe. 2006. Eviction for conservation-a global overview. Conservation and Society 4(3):424-470.
22. Brockington, D., J. Igoe, and K. Schmidt-Soltau. 2006. Conservation, human rights, and poverty reduction. Conservation Biology 20(1):250-252.
23. Brockington, D., and K. Schmidt-Soltau. 2004. The social and environmental impacts of wilderness and development. Oryx 38(2):140-142.
24. Brook, R. K., and S. M. McLachlan. 2008. Trends and prospects for local knowledge in ecological and conservation research and monitoring. Biodiversity Conservation 17:3501-3512.
25. Brosius, J. P. 2004. What counts as local knowledge in global environmental assessments and conventions? [online] URL: http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/bridging/papers/Brosius.peter.pdf.
26. Callicott, J. B., and M. P. Nelson, editors. 1998. The great new wilderness debate. University of Georgia Press, Athens, Georgia, USA.
27. Campbell, L. M., and A. Vainio-Mattila. 2003. Participatory development and community-based conservation: opportunities missed for lessons learned? Human Ecology 31(3):417-437.
28. Castree, N., and B. Braun, editors. 2001. Social nature; theory, practice, and politics. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
29. Cernea, M. M., and K. Schmidt-Soltau. 2006. Poverty risks and national parks: policy issues in conservation and resettlement. World Development 34 (10):1808-1830.
30. Chapin, M. 2004. A challenge to conservationists. World Watch 17(6):17-31.
31. Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing grounded theory; a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
32. Choi, C. 2008. Tierra del Fuego-the beavers must die. Nature 453:968.
33. Clayton, S., and S. Opotow. 2003. Identity and the natural environment; the psychological significance of nature. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
34. Crist, E. 2004. Against the social construction of nature and wilderness. Environmental Ethics 26 (1):5-24.
35. Cristancho, S., and J. Vining. 2009. Perceived intergenerational differences in the transmission of traditional ecological knowledge in two indigenous groups from Colombia and Guatemala. Culture Psychology 15:229.
36. Cronon, W., editor. 1995. Uncommon ground; rethinking the human place in nature. Norton, New York, New York, USA.
37. Demeritt, D. 2002. What is the "social construction of nature?" A typology and sympathetic critique. Progress in Human Geography 26:767-790.
38. Dowie, M. 2009. Conservation refugees; the hundred-year conflict between global conservation and native people. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
39. Escobar, A. 1998. Whose knowledge, whose nature? Biodiversity, conservation and the political ecology of social movements. Journal of Political Ecology 5:53-82.
40. Fisher, B., and T. Christopher. 2007. Poverty and biodiversity: measuring the overlap of human poverty and the biodiversity hotspots. Ecological Economics 62:93-101.
41. Ghimire, S. K., D. McKey, and Y. Aumeeruddy-Thomas. 2004. Heterogeneity in ethnoecological knowledge and management of medicinal plants in the Himalayas of Nepal: implications for conservation. Ecology and Society 9(3):6. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art6/.
42. Gómez-Pompa, A., and A. Kaus. 1992. Taming the wilderness myth. BioScience 42(4):271-279.
43. Goodwin, P. 1998. "Hired hands" or "local voice": understandings and experience of local participation in conservation. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 23:481-499.
44. Görg, C. 2003. Regulation der Naturverhältnisse. Zu einer kritischen Theorie der ökologischen Krise. Verlag Westfälisches Dampfboot, Münster, Germany.
45. Görg, C. 2004. The construction of societal relationships with nature. Poiesis und Praxis 3:22-36.
46. Görg, C. 2010. Societal relationships with nature; a dialectical approach to environmental politics. In A. Biro, editor. Critical ecologies. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, in press.
47. Greider, T., and L. Garkovich. 1994. Landscapes: the social construction of nature and the environment. Rural Sociology 59(1):1-24.
48. Hacking, I. 1999. The social construction of what? Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
49. Haraway, D. 1991. Simians, cyborgs and women: the reinvention of nature. Routledge, New York, New York, USA.
50. Haraway, D. 2008. When species meet. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
51. Hickey, S., and G. Mohan, editors. 2004. Participation: from tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation. Zed Books, London, UK.
52. Hinchliffe, S. 2007. Geographies of nature; societies, environments, ecologies. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
53. Hinchliffe, S. 2008. Reconstituting nature conservation: towards a careful political ecology. Geoforum 39:88-97.
54. Igoe, J., and S. Sullivan. 2008. Problematizing neoliberal biodiversity conservation: displaced and disobedient knowledge. [online] URL: http://www.iied.org/pubs/pdfs/G02526.pdf.
55. Infield, M. 2001. Cultural values: a forgotten strategy for building community support for protected areas in Africa. Conservation Biology 15 (3):800-802.
56. Ingold, T. 2000. The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge, London, UK.
57. Ishwaran, N., A. Persic, and N. Hoang Tri. 2008. Concept and practice: the case of UNESCO biosphere reserves. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development 7 (2):118-131.
58. Jorgensen, D. L. 1989. Participant observation: a methodology of human studies. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
59. Kaltenborn, B. P. 1998. Effects of sense of place on responses to environmental impacts. Applied Geography 18(2):169-189.
60. Kaschula, S. A., W. E. Twine, and M. C. Scholes. 2005. Coppice harvesting of fuelwood species on a South African common: utilizing scientific and indigenous knowledge in community-based natural resource management. Human Ecology 33 (3):387-418.
61. Körner, S. 2004. Naturbilder und Heimatideale in Naturschutz und Freiraumplanung. Pages 77-103 in L. Fischer, editor. Projektionsfläche Natur. Zum Zusammenhang von Naturbildern und gesellschaftlichen Verhältnissen. University Press, Hamburg, Germany.
62. Latour, B. 1993. We have never been modern. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
63. Latour, B. 2004. Politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
64. Locke, H., and P. Dearden. 2005. Rethinking protected area categories and the new paradigm. Environmental Conservation 32(1):1-10.
65. Lorimer, J. 2007. Nonhuman charisma. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 25:911-932.
66. Maffi, L., editor. 2001. On biocultural diversity; linking language, knowledge and the environment. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
67. Matthiesen, U. 2005. Knowledgescapes; pleading for a knowledge turn in socio-spatial research. Working Paper. Leibniz-Institut for Regional Development and Structural Planning (IRS), Erkner, Germany.
68. Mohan, G., and K. Stokke. 2000. Participatory development and empowerment: the danger of localism. Third World Quarterly 21(2):247-268.
69. Naughton-Treves, L., M. Buck Holland, and K. Brandon. 2005. The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 30:219-252.
70. Nazarea, V. D. 2006. Local knowledge and memory in biodiversity conservation. Annual Review of Anthropology 35:317-335.
71. Neumann, R.P. 1997. Primitive ideas: protected-area buffer zones and the politics of land in Africa. Development and Change 28:559-582.
72. Nelson, M. P., and J. B. Callicott, editors. 2008. The wilderness debate rages on. University of Georgia Press, Athens, Georgia, USA.
73. Nygren, A. 1999. Local knowledge in the environment-development discourse; from dichotomies to situated knowledges. Critique of Anthropology 19(3):267-288.
74. Oelschlaeger, M. 1991. The idea of wilderness. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
75. Pedynowski, D. 2003. Science(s)-which, when and whose? Probing the metanarrative of scientific knowledge in the social construction of nature. Progress in Human Geography 27(6):735-752.
76. Posey, D. A., editor. 1999. Cultural and spiritual values of biodiversity. Intermediate Technology, London, UK.
77. Redford, K.H., J.G. Robinson, and W.M. Adams. 2006. Parks as shibboleths. Conservation Biology 20(1):1-2.
78. Roué, M. 2006. Healing the wounds of school by returning to the land: Cree elders come to the rescue of a lost generation. International Social Science Journal 58(187):15-24.
79. Rozzi, R., editor. 2003. Multi-ethnic bird guide of the austral temperate forests of South America. Ediciones de la Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas, Chile.
80. Rozzi, R., F. Massardo, A. Berghöfer, C. Anderson, A. Mansilla, M. Mansilla, J. Plana, U. Berghöfer, P. Araya, and E. Barros. 2006a. Reserva de Biosfera Cabo de Hornos. Ediciones de la Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas, Chile.
81. Rozzi, R., Massardo, F., Anderson, C. B., Heidinger, K., and J. A. Silander. 2006b. Ten principles for biocultural conservation at the southern tip of the Americas: the approach of the Omora Ethnobotanical Park. Ecology and Society 11(1): 43. [online] URL:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art43/.
82. Runte, A. 1997. National parks; the American experience. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
83. Sanderson, S. E., and K. H. Redford. 2003. Contested relationships between biodiversity conservation and poverty alleviation. Oryx 37 (4):389-390.
84. Sanderson, S. E., and K. H. Redford. 2004. The defence of conservation is not an attack on the poor. Oryx 38(2):146-147.
85. Sanderson, S. E., and K. H. Redford. 2006. Noroads, only directions. Conservation and Society 4 (3):379-382.
86. Sarkar, S. 1999. Wilderness preservation and biodiversity conservation; keeping divergent goals distinct. BioScience 49(5):405-412.
87. Shelford, V. 1943. Twenty-five year effort at saving nature for scientific purposes. Science 98:280-281.
88. Shepherd, G., editor. 2008. The ecosystem approach; learning from experience. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
89. Sillitoe, P. 1998. The development of indigenous knowledge. Current Anthropology 39(2):223-252.
90. Simberloff, D. 1998. Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: Is single-species management passé in the landscape era? Biological Conservation 83 (3):247-257.
91. Sinclair, A. R. E. 1998. Natural regulation of ecosystems in protected areas as ecological baselines. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26(3):399-409.
92. Soulé, M. E., and G. Lease, editors. 1995. Reinventing nature? Responses to postmodern deconstruction. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
93. Stewart, D. W. 1990. Focus groups: theory and practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
94. Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research; techniques andproceduresfor developing grounded theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
95. Terborgh, J. 2004. Reflections of a scientist on the World Parks Congress. Conservation Biology 18 (3):619-620.
96. Thompson, C. 2002. When elephants stand for competing philosophies of nature: Amboseli National Park, Kenya. Pages 166-190 in J. Law and A. Mol, editors. 2002. Complexities; social studies of knowledge practices. Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
97. Thrift, N. 2005. From born to made: technology, biology and space. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30:463-476.
98. Tjossem, S. F. 1994. Preservation of nature and academic respectability: tensions in the Ecological Society of America, 1915-1979. Thesis. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
99. UN. 2007. United Nations declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples. [online] URL: http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf
100. UNEP. 1998. Report of the Workshop on the Ecosystem Approach, Malawi. [online] URL:http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/cop/cop-04/information/cop-04-inf-09-en.pdf.
101. UNEP/CBD. 2000. Ecosystem approach. pages 103-109 in Appendix 3. Decisions adopted by the conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity at its fifth meeting. [online] URL: http://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/COP-05-dec-en.pdf.
102. Walpole, M. J., and N. Leader-Williams. 2002. Tourism and flagship species in conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 11:543-547.
103. West, P., J. Igoe, and D. Brockington. 2006. Parks and peoples: the social impact of protected areas. Annual Review of Anthropology 35:251-277.
104. Whatmore, S. 2002. Hybrid geographies: natures, culture, spaces. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
105. Williams, D. R., and S. I. Stewart. 1998. Sense of place: an elusive concept that is finding a home in ecosystem management. Journal of Forestry 96:18-23.
106. World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA). 2000. Indigenous and traditional peoples and protected areas; principles, guidelines and case studies. Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series, Number 4. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
107. World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA). 2004. Indigenous and local communities and protected areas: towards equity and enhanced conservation; guidance on policy and practice for co-managed protected areas and community conserved areas. Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series, Number 11. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
108. World Conservation Union (IUCN). 2003. Fifth World Parks Congress recommendations. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
109. World Conservation Union (IUCN). 2005. Benefits beyond boundaries; proceedings of the Fifth World Parks Congress. World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland.
110. World Conservation Union (IUCN). 2008. Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. [online] URL: http://data.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/PAPS-016.pdf.
111. Zimmerer, K. S. 2000. The reworking of conservation geographies: nonequilibrium landscapes and nature-society hybrids. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90 (2):356-369.
112. Zimmerer, K. S., editor. 2006. Globalization and new geographies of conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.