Contested relationships between biodiversity conservation and poverty alleviation

ORYX

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 389-390

  Sanderson, Steven E ^a   Redford, Kent H ^a  

^a WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85019422900     PISSN: 00306053     EISSN: 13653008     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S003060530300070X     Document Type: Editorial

References (11)

1. Anderson, A., May, P. & Balick, M. (1991) The Subsidy from Nature. Columbia University Press, New York, USA.
2. Bojo, J., Bucknall, J., Hamilton, K., Ishor, N., Kraus, C. & Pillai, P. (2001) Environment: Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers. World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
3. Department for International Development (DFID) (2002) Wildlife and Poverty Study. Livestock and Wildlife Advisory Group, Department for International Development, UK.
4. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) (2001) Rural Poverty Report. International Fund for Agricultural Development, Rome, Italy.
5. Lele, S.M. (1992) Sustainable development: a critical review. World Development, 19, 607–621.
6. Meier, G.M. (1984) The Formative Period. In Pioneers in Development (eds G.M. Meier & D. Seers), pp. 3–22. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
7. Myint, H. (1954) An interpretation of economic backwardness. Oxford Economic Papers, 6,132-163.
8. Naughton, L. & Sanderson, S. (1995) Property, politics and wildlife conservation. World Development, 28,1265-1275.
9. Redford, K. & Padoch, C. (1991) Conservation of Neotropical Forests: Building from Traditional Resource Use. Columbia University Press, New York, USA.
10. Redford, K. & Sanderson, S. (1992) The brief barren marriage of biodiversity and sustainability. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 73, 36–39.
11. Sen, A. (1999) Development as Freedom. Knopf, New York, USA.