Beyond dry feet? experiences from a participatory water-management planning case in the Netherlands

Ecology and Society

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Lamers, Machiel ^a   Ottow, Bouke ^b   Francois, Greet ^c   Korff, Yorck V ^d  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b DELTARES   (Netherlands)

^c Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences   (United States)

^d Lisode   (France)

Author keywords

Participatory planning; Process design; Public participation; Water management

Indexed keywords

CAPACITY BUILDING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PLANNING PROCESS; STAKEHOLDER; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER PLANNING;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 77953800957     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-03204-150114     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Arnstein, S. R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 3(4):216-224.
2. Beierle, T. C., and J. Cayford. 2002. Democracy in practice. Public participation in environmental decisions. Resources for the Future Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
3. Beierle, T. C., and D. M. Konisky. 2000. Values, conflict, and trust in participatory environmental planning. Journal for Policy Analysis and Management 19(4): 587-602.
4. Bouwen, R., and T. Tailleu. 2004. Multi-party collaboration as social learning for interdependence: developing relational knowing for sustainable natural resources management. Journal of Community and Applied Psychology 14:137-153.
5. Creighton, J. L. 2005. The public participation handbook: making better decisions through citizen involvement. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, USA.
6. Eden, C. 1996. The stakeholder/collaborator strategy workshop. Pages 44-56 in C. Huxham, editor. Creating collaborative advantage. Sage Publications Ltd., London, UK.
7. European Communities. 2003. Economics and the environment: the implementation challenge of the Water Framework Directive. Common implementation strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance Document l. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg.
8. Folke, C., T. Hahn, P. Olsson, and J. Norberg. 2004. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 30(8):1-33.
9. Geurts, J., and I. Mayer. 1996. Methods for participatory policy analysis: towards a conceptual model for research and development. Work and Organization Research Centre (WORC). Report 96.12.008/3. Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
10. Glicken, J. 2000. Getting stakeholder participation right: a discussion of participatory processes and possible pitfalls. Environmental Science and Policy 3:305-310.
11. Gray, B. 1996. Cross-sectoral partners: collaborative alliances among business, government and communities. Pages 57-79 in C. Huxham, editor. Creating collaborative advantage. Sage Publications Ltd., London, UK.
12. Groot, A., N. van Dijk, J. Jiggins, and M. Maarleveld. 2002. Three challenges in the facilitation of system-wide change. Pages 199-214 in C. Leeuwis and R. Pyburn, editors. WWheelbarrows full of frogs. Social learning in rural resource management. Koninklijke van Gorcum BV, Assen, The Netherlands.
13. Hare, M., R. A. Letcher, and A. J. Jakeman. 2003. Participatory natural resource management: a comparison of four case studies. Integrated Assessment 4(2):73-78.
14. HarmoniCOP. 2005. Learning together to manage together: improving participation in water management. Harmonising Collaboration Planning Project, Europe. [online] URL: http://www.harmon icop.uos.de/HarmoniCOPHandbook.pdf.
15. Hoogheemraadschap De Stichtse Rijnlanden (HDSR). 2003. Waterbeheersplan. Hoogheemraadschap De Stichtse Rijnlanden, Houten, The Netherlands.
16. Healy, P. 2006. Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies. Second edition. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, New York, USA.
17. Holtman, M., A. Menkveld, and E. Addink. 2005. Plan van aanpak watergebiedsplan Kromme Rijn en KRW-pilot waterlichaam Kromme Rijn. Bijlage bij bestuursvoorstel 05.SPR. Hoogheemraadschap De Stichtse Rijnlanden, Houten, The Netherlands.
18. Huitema, D., E. Mostert, W. Egas, S. Moellenkamp, C. Pahl-Wostl, and R. Yalcin. 2009. Adaptive water governance: assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-) management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecology and Society 14 (1): 26. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety. org/vol14/iss1/art26/.
19. Koenraadt, R., A. Menkveld, M. Stark, and A. Koomen. 2008. Watergebiedsplan tussen Kromme Rijn en Amsterdam-Rijnkanaal. Hoogheemraadschap De Stichtse Rijnlanden, Houten, The Netherlands. [online] URL: http://www.hdsr.nl/aspx/download.aspx?File=/contents/pages/60146/watergebiedsplan_tussen_kromme_rijn_en_amsterdam-rijnkanaal.pdf.
20. Lynn, F. M., and G. J. Busenberg. 1995. Citizen advisory committees and environmental policy: what we know, what's left to discover. Risk Analysis 15(2):147-162.
21. Marks, J. S. 2004. Negotiating change in urban water management: attending to community trust in the process. Pages 203-215 in T. Daniell, R. James, and K. Takara, editors. Cities as catchments- WSUD2004. Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Water Sensitive Urban Design, 2124 November, 2004, Adelaide, South Australia. [online] URL: www.wsud.org/downloads/Info%20Exchange%20%20Lit/WSUD_04_Conf_Papers/WS040098.PDF.
22. Meadowcroft, J. 1998. Co-operative management regimes: a way forward? Pages 21-42 in P. Glasbergen, editor. Co-operative environmental governance. Public-private agreements as a policy strategy. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
23. Moellenkamp, S., M. Lamers, and E. Ebenhoeh. 2007. Institutional elements for adaptive water management regimes. Comparing two regional water management regimes in the Rhine basin. Pages 147-166 in C. Pahl-Wostl, P. Kabat, and J. Moltgen, editors. Adaptive and integrated water management. Coping with complexity and uncertainty. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
24. Mostert, E. 2006. Integrated water resources management in the Netherlands: how concepts function. Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education 135:19-27.
25. Mostert, E., C. Pahl-Wostl, Y. Rees, B. Searle, D. Tabara, and J. Tippett. 2007. Soical learning in European river-basin management: barriers and fostering mechanisms from 10 river basins. Ecology and Society 12(1): 19. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art19/.
26. Neuman, W. L. 2003. Social research methods. Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Fifth edition. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
27. Newig, J., and C. Pahl-Wostl. 2005. The role of public participation in managing uncertainty in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. European Environment 15:333-343.
28. Olsson, P., C. Folke, and F. Berkes. 2005. Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management 34(1):75-90.
29. Pahl-Wostl, C., J. Sendzimir, P. Jeffrey, J. Aerts, G. Berkamp, and K. Cross. 2007. Managing change toward adaptive water management through social learning. Ecology and Society 12(2): 30. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/ iss2/art30/.
30. Renn, O. 1999. A model for an analytic-deliberative process in risk management. Environmental Science and Technology 33(18):3049-3055.
31. Robson, C. 2001. Real world research. A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Blackwell Publishers Ltd., Oxford, UK.
32. Rowe, G., and L. J. Frewer. 2000. Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values 25(1):3-29.
33. Rowe, G., and L. J. Frewer. 2004. Evaluating public participation exercises: a research agenda. Science, Technology, and Human Values29(4):512-556.
34. Rowe, G., R. Marsh, and L. J. Frewer. 2001.Public methods: evolving and operationalizing an evaluation framework. Final report to the Department of Health and Health and Safety Executive. Institute of Food Research, Norwich, UK.
35. Syme, G. J., and B. E. Nancarrow. 2002. Evaluation of public involvement programs: measuring justice and process criteria. Water 29 (4):18-24.
36. van der Arend, S. 2007. Pleitbezorgers, procesmanagers en participanten. Interactief beleid en de rolverdeling tussen overhead en burgers in de Nederlandse democratie. Eburon, Delft, The Netherlands.
37. Voss, J.-P., and R. Kemp. 2006. Sustainability and reflexive governance: introduction. Pages 3-27 in J.-P. Voss, D. Bauknecht, and R. Kemp, editors. Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Cheltenham, UK.
38. Warner, J. 2005. Multi-stakeholder platforms: integrating society in water resource management? Ambiente y Sociedade 8(2):1-20.
39. Warner, J., and A. Verhallen. 2007. The nature of the beast: towards a comparative MSP typology. Pages 21-29 in J. Warners, editor. Multi-stakeholder platforms for integrated water management. Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Aldershot, UK.
40. Watson, N. 2007. Collaborative capital: a key to their successful practice of integrated water resources management. Pages 31-48 in J. Warners, editor. Multi-stakeholder platforms for integrated water management. Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Aldershot, UK.
41. Webler, T. 1995. Right discourse in citizen participation-an evaluative yardstick. Pages 3586 in O. Renn, T. Webler, and P. M. Wiedemann, editors. Fairness and competence in citizen participation-evaluating models for environmental discourse. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
42. Webler T., and S. Tuler. 2001. Public participation in watershed management planning: views on process from people in the field. Human Ecology Review 8(2):29-39.