A model for an analytic - Deliberative process in risk management

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 33, Issue 18, 1999, Pages 3049-3055

  Renn, Ortwin ^a  

^a Center of Technology Assessment in Baden Wurttemberg   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PUBLIC POLICY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT;

COOPERATIVE DISCOURSE;

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; COMPETENCE; DECISION MAKING; MANAGEMENT; POLICY; RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0033568393     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es981283m     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Stern, P.C.; Fineberg, V. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society, National Research Council, Committee on Risk Characterization, National Academy Press: Washington, D.C., 1996.
2. Okrent, D. Risk Perception and Risk Management: On Knowledge, Resource Allocation and Equity. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 1998, 59, 17-25.
3. Cross, F. B. Facts and Values in Risk Assessment. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 1998, 59, 27-45.
4. Renn, O. The Role of Risk Communication and Public Dialogue for Improving Risk Management. Risk Decis. Policy 1998,3 (1), 5-30.
5. Webler, Th. "Right" Discourse in Citizen Participation. An Evaluative Yardstick. In Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse; Renn, O., Webler, Th., Wiedemann, P., Eds.; Kluwer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, and Boston, 1995; pp 35-86.
6. Dake, K. Orienting Dispositions-in the Perceptions of Risk: An Analysis of Contemporary Worldviews and Cultural Biases. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 1991, 22, 61-82.
7. Drottz-Sjöberg, B.-M. Perception of Risk. Studies of Risk Attitudes, Perceptions, and Definitions; Center for Risk Research: Stockholm, 1991.
8. Dietz, T.; Stern, P. C.; Rycroft, R. W. Definitions of Conflict and the Legitimation of Resources: The Case of Environmental Risk. Social. Forum 1989, 4, 47-69.
9. Evers, A.; Nowotny, H. Über den Umgang mit Unsicherheit. Die Entdeckung der Gestaltbarkeit von Gesellschaft; Suhrkamp: Frankfurt/Main, Germany, 1987.
10. Jasonoff, S. The Political Science of Risk Perception. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 1998, 59, 91-99.
11. Jasanoff, S. Bridging the Two Cultures of Risk Analysis. Risk Anal. 1993, 73(2), 123-129.
12. Renn, O. Style of Using Scientific Expertise: A Comparative Framework. Sci. Public Policy 1995, 22 (Jun), 147-156.
13. Bradbury, J. A. The Policy Implications of Differing Concepts of Risk. Sci., Technol., Hum. Values 1989, 14 (4), 380-399.
14. Horlick-Jones, T. Meaning and Contextualization in Risk Assessment. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 1998, 59, 79-89.
15. Margolis, H. Dealing with Risk. Why the Public and the Experts Disagree on Environmental Issues; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 1996.
16. Wynne, B. Sheepfarming after Chernobyl. Environment 1989, 31, 11-15, 33-39.
17. McDaniels, T. The Structured Value Referendum: Eliciting Preferences for Environmental Policy Alternatives. J. Policy Anal. Manage. 1996, 15 (2), 227-251.
18. Primack, J.; von Hippel, F. Advice and Dissent: Scientists in the Political Arena; Basic Books: New York, 1974.
19. Kunreuther, H.; Slovic, P. Science, Values, and Risk. In Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science; Special Issue. Challenges in Risk Assessment and Risk Management, Kunreuther, H., Slovic, P., Eds.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, 1996; pp 116-125.
20. Chess, C.; Dietz, Th.; Shannon, M. Who Should Deliberate When? Hum. Ecol. Rev. 1998, 5 (1, Summer), 45-48.
21. Creighton, J. L. The Use of Values: Public Participation in the Planning Process. In Public Involvement and Social Impact Assessment; Daneke, G. A., Garcia, M. W., Delli Priscoli, J., Eds.; Westview Press: Boulder, CO, 1983; pp 143-160.
22. Webler, Th.; Renn, O. A Brief Primer on Participation: Philosophy and Practice. In Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse; Renn, O., Webler, Th., Wiedemann, P., Eds,; Kluwer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, and Boston, 1995; pp 17-34.
23. Pidgeon, N. F. The Limits to Safety? Culture, Politics, Learning and Manmade Disasters. J. Contingencies Crisis Manage. 1997, 5 (1), 1-14.
24. Douglas, M.; Wildavsky, A. Risk and Culture; University of California Press: Berkeley, 1982.
25. Linnerooth-Bayer, J.; Fitzgerald, K. B. Conflicting Views on Fair Siting Proceeses: Evidence from Austria and the U.S. Risk: Health, Saf. Environ. 1996, 7 (2), 119-134.
26. MacLean, D. Social Values and the Distribution of Risk. In Values at Risk; MacLean, D., Ed.; Bowman and Allanheld: Totowa, NJ, 1986; pp 75-93.
27. Bacow, L. S.; Wheeler, M. Environmental Dispute Resolution; Plenum: New York, 1984.
28. Burns, T. R.; Überhorst, R. Creative Democracy: Systematic Conflict Resolution and Policymaking in a World of High Science and Technology, Praeger: New York, 1988.
29. Creighton, J. L., Dunning, C. M., Delli Priscoli, J., Eds. Public Involvement and Dispute Resolution: A Reader on the Second Decade of Experience at the Institute of Water Resources. Institute of Water Resources. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Fort Belvoir, VA, 1998.
30. Crosby, N.; Kelly, J. M.; Schaefer, P. Citizen Panels: A New Approach to Citizen Participation. Public Administration Rev. 1986, 46, 170-178.
31. Langton, S. Citizen Participation in America: Current Reflections on State of the Art. In Langton, S., Ed.; Citizen Participation in America; Lexington Books: Lexington, KY, 1978; pp 1-12.
32. Renn, O., Webler, Th., Wiedemann, P., Eds. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation; Kluwer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995.
33. Susskind, L. E.; Fields, P. Dealing with an Angry Public: The Mutual Gains Approach to Resolving Disputes; The Free Press: New York, 1996.
34. Renn, O.; Webler Th.; Wiedemann, P. The Pursuit of Fair and Competent Citizen Participation. In Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse; Renn, O.; Webler, Th., Wiedemann, P., Eds.; Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995; pp 339-368.
35. Renn, O.; Albrecht, G.; Kotte, U.; Peters, H. P.; Stegelmann, H. U. Sozialvertrdgliche Energiepolitik. Ein Gutachten fir die Bundesregierung; HTV Editon Technik und Sozialer Wandel: Munich, 1985.
36. Renn, O.; Goble, R.; Levine, D.; Rakel, H.; Webler, Th. Citizen Participation for Sludge Management; Final Report to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection; CENTED, Clark University: Worcester, 1989.
37. Renn, O.; Webler, Th.; Rakel, H.; Dienel, P. C.; Johnson, B. Public Participation in Decision Making: A Three-Step Procedure. Policy Sci. 1993, 26, 189-214.
38. Renn, O.; Webler, Th. Der kooperative Diskurs-Theoretische Grundlagen, Anforderungen, Möglichkeiten. In Abfallpolitik im kooperativen Diskurs. Büirgerbeteiligung bei der Standortsuche für eine Deponie im Kanton Aargau; Renn, O., Kastenholz, H., Schild, P., Wilhelm, U., Eds.; Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH: Zürich, 1998; pp 3-103.
39. Schneider, E.; Oppermann, B.; Renn, O. Experiences from Germany: Application of a Structured Model of Public Participation in Waste Management Planning. Interact. J. Public Participation July 1998, 4 (1, Jul), 63-72.
40. Renn, O.; Schrimpf, M.; Büttner, Th.; Carius, R.; Köberle, S.; Oppermann, B.; Schneider, E.; Zöller, K. Abfallwirtschaft 2005. Bürger planen ein regionales Abfallkonzepf; Noraos: Baden-Baden, Germany, 1999.
41. Keeney, R. L.; Renn, O.; von Winterfeldt, D. Structuring West Germany's Energy Objectives. Energy Policy 1987, 15 (4, Aug), 352-362.
42. von Winterfeldt, D. Value Tree Analysis: An Introduction and an Application to Offshore Oil Drilling. Insuring and Managing Hazardous Risks: From Seveso to Bhopal and Beyond; Heindorfer, P. R., Kunreuther, H. C., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, 1987; pp 439-377.
43. Webler, Th.; Levine, D.; Rakel, H.; Renn, O. The Group Delphi: A Novel Attempt at Reducing Uncertainty; Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change 1991, 39 (3), 253-263.
44. Turoff, M. The Design of a Policy Delphi. Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change 1970, 2 (2), 84-98.
45. Dienel, P. C. Contributing to Social Decision Methodology: Citizen Reports on Technological Projects. In Social Decision Methodology for Technologial Projects; Vlek, C., Cvetkovich, G., Eds.; Kluwer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1989; pp 133-150.
46. Dienel, P. C.; Renn, O. Planning Cells: A Gate to Fractal Mediation. In Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse; Renn, O., Webler, Th., Wiedemann, P., Eds.; Kluwer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995; pp 117-140.
47. Renn, O.; Webler, Th.; Kastenholz, H. Procedural and Substantive Fairness in Landfill Siting; Risk-Health, Saf. Environ.; Spring 1996, 7(2, Spring), 145-168.
48. Dienel, P. C. Die Planungszelle; Westdeutscher Verlag: Opladen, Germany, 1978.
49. Dienel, P. C.; Garbe, D. Zukünftige Energiepolitik. Ein Burgergutachten; HTV Edition Technik und Sozialer Wandel: Munich 1985.
50. Renn, O. Decision Analytic Tools for Resolving Uncertainty in the Energy Debate. Nucl. Eng. Des. 1986, 93 (2;3), 167-180.
51. Webler, Th. Experimenting with a New Democratic Instrument in Switzerland: Siting a Landfill in the Eastern Part of Canton Aargau; Working Paper; Polyproject: Safety of Technological Systems; Swiss Institute of Technology: Zürich, 1994.
52. Webler; Th.; Rakel, H.; Renn, O.; 'Johnson, B. Eliciting and Classifying Concerns: A Methodological Critique; Risk Anal. June 1995, 15 (3, Jun), 421-436.
53. Buser, M. Die Wertbaumanalyse im Projekt Aargau: eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme; Swiss Institute of Technology: Zürich, 1995.
54. Roch, I. Evaluation der 3. Phase des Bürgerbeteiligungsverfahrens in der Region Nordschwarzwald; Research Report No. 71; Akademie für Techmkfolgenabschätzung: Stuttgart, Germany, 1997.
55. Vorwerk, V.; Kämper, E. Evaluation der 3. Phase des Bürgerbeteiligungsverfahrens in der Region Nordschwarzwald. Research Report No. 70; Akademie für Technikfolgenabschätzung: Stuttgart, Germany, 1997.
56. Lynn, F. M. The Interplay of Science and Values in Assessing and Regulating Environmental Risks; Sci., Technol. Human Values; Spring 1986, 11 (2, Spring), 40-50.
57. Final Report of the Citizens Panel on Agriculture and Water Quality; Center for New Democratic Processes: Minneapolis, 1985.
58. von Schomberg, H. The Erosion of the Valuespheres. The Ways in Which Society Copes with Scientific, Moral and Ethical Uncertainty. In Contested Technology. Ethics, Risk and Public Debate; von Schomberg, R., Ed.; International Centre for Human and Public Affairs: Tilburg, The Netherlands, 1995; pp 13-28.
59. Dryzek J. S. Discursive Democracy, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 1990.
60. Webler, Th. Beyond Science: Deliberation and Analysis in Public Decision Making; Hum. Ecol. Rev. Summer 1998, 5(1, Summer), 61-63.
61. Dunlap, R. E., Kraft, M. E., Rosa, E. A., Eds.; Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste. Citizen's View of Repository Siting; Dake University Press: Durham NC, 1993.
62. Rosa, E. A. NAMBY PAMBY and NIMBY PIMBY: Public Issues in the Siting of Hazardous Waste Facilities. Forum Appl. Res. Public Policy 1988, 3, 114-123.
63. Kathlene, L.; Martin, J. Enhancing Citizen Participation: Panel Designs, Perspectives, and Policy Formation; Policy Anal. Manage. 1991, 10 (1), 46-63.