Indel segregating within introns in the chicken genome are positively correlated with the recombination rates

Hereditas

Volumn 147, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 53-57

  Rao, You Sheng ^a,b   Wang, Zhang Feng ^a   Chai, Xue Wen ^a   Wu, Guo Zuo ^a   Nie, Qing Hua ^b   Zhang, Xi Quan ^b  

^a Jiangxi Educational Institute   (China)

^b SOUTH CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOSOME; CHICKEN; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; GENE MAPPING; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENOME; INDEL MUTATION; INTERGENERIC HYBRIDIZATION; INTRON; NONHUMAN; POINT MUTATION;

EID: 77953766753     PISSN: 00180661     EISSN: 16015223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2009.2141.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Beye M, Gattermeier I, Hasselmann M. Exceptionally high levels of recombination across the honey bee genome. Genome Res. 2006, 16:1339-1344.
2. Bensasson D, Petrov D A, Zhang D X. Genomic gigantism: DNA loss is slow in mountain grasshoppers. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2001, 18:246-253.
3. Bhangale T R, Rieder M J, Livingston R J. Comprehensive identification and characterization of diallelic insertion deletion polymorphisms in 330 human candidate genes. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005, 14:59-69.
4. Brandström M, Ellegren H. The genomic landscape of short insertion and deletion polymorphisms in the chicken (Gallus gallus) genome: a high frequency of deletions in tandem duplicates. Genetics 2007, 176:1691-1701.
5. Britten R J. Divergence between samples of chimpanzee and human DNA sequences is 5%, counting indels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99:13633-13635.
6. Britten R J, Rowen L, Williams J. Majority of divergence between closely related DNA samples is due to indels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100:4661-4665.
7. Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Nature 2005, 437:69-87. Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis Consortium
8. Comeron J M, Kreitman M. The correlation between intron length and recombination in Drosophila: dynamic equilibrium between mutational and selective forces. Genetics 2000, 156:1175-1190.
9. Fontanillas P, Hartl D L, Reuter M. Genome organization and gene expression shape the transposable element distribution in the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatin. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3:e210.
10. Groenen M A, Cheng H H, Bumatead N. A consensus linkage map of the chicken genome. Genome Res. 2000, 10:137-147.
11. Groenen M A, Wahlberg P, Foglio M. A highdensity SNP-based linkage map of the chicken genome reveals sequence features correlated with recombination rate. Genome Res. 2009, 19:510-519.
12. Gregory T R. Synergy between sequence and size in large-scale genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2005, 6:699-708.
13. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective Bonferroni test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 1979, 6:65-70.
14. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 2004, 432:695-716. International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium (ICGSC)
15. A genetic variation map for chicken with 2.8 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Nature 2004, 432:717-725. International Chicken Polymorphism Map Consortium (ICPMC)
16. Kaiser V B, Tuinen M V, Ellegren H. Insertion events of CR1 retrotransposable elements elucidate the phylogenetic branching order in galliform birds. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24:338-347.
17. Kent W J, Sugnet C W, Furey T S. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 2002, 12:996-1006.
18. Kliman R M, Hey J. Reduced natural selection associated with low recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1993, 10:1239-1258.
19. Mills R E, Luttie C T, Larkins C E. An initial map of insertion and deletion (INDEL) variation in the human genome. Genome Res. 2006, 16:1182-1190.
20. Payseur B A, Nachman M W. Microsatellite variation and recombination rate in the human genome. Genetics 2000, 156:1285-1298.
21. Petrov D A. DNA loss and evolution of genome size in Drosophila. Genetica 2002, 115:81-91.
22. Petrov D A, Hartl D L. High rate of DNA loss in the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis species groups. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1998, 15:293-302.
23. Petrov D A, Angster T A, Johnston J S. Evidenxce for DNA loss as a deterninant of genome size. Science 2000, 287:1060-1590.
24. Ptak S E, Petrov D A. How intron splicing affects the deletion and insertion profile in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2002, 162:1233-1244.
25. Robertson H M. The large srh family of chemoreceptor gene in Caenorhabditis nematodes reveals processes of genome evolution involving large duplications and deletions and intron gains and losses. Genome Res. 2000, 10:192-203.
26. Robin G C, Russell R J, Cutter D J. The evolution of an alpha-esterase pseudogene inactivated in the Drosophila melanogaster lineage. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000, 17:563-575.
27. Tian D, Wang Q, Zhang P. Single-nucleotide mutation rate increases close to insertions/deletions in eukaryotes. Nature 2008, 455:105-108.
28. Zhang W, Sun X, Yuan H. The pattern of insertion/deletion polymorphism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Genet. Genomics 2008, 280:351-361.
29. Zhu Y, Strassmann J E, Queller D C. Insertions, substitutions and the origin of microsatellites. Genet. Res. 2000, 76:227-236.