Comparison of ambulatory versus conventional urodynamics in females with urinary incontinence

Neurourology and Urodynamics

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 518-521

  Dokmeci, Fulya ^a   Sevalm , Murat ^a   Gok, Haydar ^a  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Incontinence; LUTS; Urodynamics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY URODYNAMIC; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL URODYNAMIC; DETRUSOR MUSCLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MICTURITION; MIXED INCONTINENCE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STRESS INCONTINENCE; SUPINE POSITION; SYMPTOM; URINE INCONTINENCE; URODYNAMICS;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; URINARY BLADDER; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS; URINARY INCONTINENCE, URGE; URINATION; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 77953562062     PISSN: 07332467     EISSN: 15206777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nau.20821     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Cardozo L, Stanton S. Genuine stress incontinence and detrusor instability-a review of 200 patients. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1980;87:184-190
2. Patravali N. Ambulatory urodynamic monitoring: Are we wasting our time? J Obstet Gynaecol 2007;27:413-415
3. Pannek J, Pieper P. Clinical usefulness of ambulatory urodynamics in the diagnosis and treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2008;42:428-432
4. Martin JL, Williams KS, Abrams KR, et al. Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence. Health Technol Assess 10(6):1-132, iii-iv. Review.
5. Wall L. Diagnosis and management of urinary incontinence due to detrusor instability. Obstet Gynecol Survey 1990;45:8S-11S.
6. Blaivas J. Diagnostic evaluation of urinary incontinence. Urology 1990;36: 11-20.
7. Davis G, McClure G, Sherman R, et al. Ambulatory urodynamics of female soldiers. Mil Med 1998;163:808-812
8. McInerney PD, Vanner TF, Harris SA, et al. Ambulatory urodynamics. Br J Urol 1991;67:272-274
9. Webb RJ, Ramsden PD, Neal DE. Ambulatory monitoring and electronic measurement of urinary leakage in the diagnosis of detrusor instability and incontinence. Br J Urol 2008;68:148-152
10. Radley SC, Rosario DJ, Chapple CR, et al. Conventional and ambulatory urodynamic findings in women with symptoms suggestive of bladder overactivity. J Urol 2001;166:2253-2258
11. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardization of terminology in lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardization sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology 2003;61:37-49.
12. Van Waalwijk van Doorn E, Anders K, Khullar V, et al. Standardization of ambulatory urodynamic monitoring: Report of the Standardization Sub- Committee of the International Continence Society for Ambulatory Urodynamic Studies. Neurourol Urodyn 2000;19:113-125
13. Glazener CMA, Lapitan MCM. Urodynamic investigations for management of urinary incontinence in children and adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002;(3):CD003195:1-26.
14. Abrams P. Urodynamics. London: Springer-Verlag; 2006. pp. 147-169
15. Oh SJ, Ku JH, Son H, et al. A comparative study of patient experiences of conventional fluoroscopic and four-hour ambulatory urodynamic studies. Yonsei Med J 2006;47:534-541
16. Al-Hayek S, Belal M, Abrams P. Does the patient's position influence the detection of detrusor overactivity? Neurourol Urodyn 2008;27:279-286
17. Arunkalaivanan AS, Mahomoud S, HowellM. Does posture affect cystometric parameters and diagnoses? Int Urogynecol J 2004;15:422-424
18. Shukla A, Johnson D, Bibby J. Impact of patient position on filling phase of urodynamics in women. Int Urogynecol J 2006;14:231-233
19. Vereecken RL, Van Nuland T. Detrusor pressure in ambulatory versus standard urodynamics. Neurourol Urodyn 1998;17:129-133
20. Davila GW. Ambulatory urodynamics in urge incontinence evaluation. Int Urogynecol J 1994;5:25-30.
21. Uebersax JS,Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, et al. Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: The incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory. Neurourol Urodynam 1995;14:131-139
22. Lemack GE, Zimmern PE. Predictability of urodynamic findings based on the urogenital distress inventory-6 questionnaire. Urology 1999;54:461-466
23. Cam C, Sakalli M, Ay P, et al. Validation of the short forms of the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) and the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) in a Turkish population. Neurourol Urodyn 2007;26:129-133