Validation of the short forms of the incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ-7) and the urogenital distress inventory (UDI-6) in a Turkish population

Neurourology and Urodynamics

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 129-133

  Cam, Cetin ^a,d   Sakalli, Mustafa ^a   Ay, Pinar ^b   Cam, Meltem ^c   Karateke, Ates ^a  

^a Zeynep Kamil Hospital   (Turkey)

^b MARMARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c DR LUTFI KIRDAR KARTAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

^d Zeynep Kamil Education and Research Hospital   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Quality of life; Urinary incontinence; Urodynamics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCONTINENCE IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OVERACTIVE BLADDER; PILOT STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; STRESS INCONTINENCE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); URINE INCONTINENCE; URODYNAMICS;

ADULT; AFFECTIVE SYMPTOMS; AGED; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TURKEY; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 33846607712     PISSN: 07332467     EISSN: 15206777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nau.20292     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. 2003. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardization subcommittee of the International Continence Society. In: Bent AE, Ostergard DR, Cundiff GW, Swift SE, editors. Ostergard's urogynecology and pelvic floor dysfunction. 5th edition, Philadelphia: Lippincot, Williams & Wilkins. Appendix I.
2. AHCPR. 1996, Managing acute and chronic urinary incontinence. Urinary incontinence in adults: Guideline update panel. Am Fam Physician 54: 1661-72.
3. Katz GP, Blaivas JG. 1983. A diagnostic dilemma: When urodynamic findings differ from the clinical impression. J Urol 129:1170-74.
4. Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD, Toozs-Hobson PM. 1995. QOL and urinary incontinence. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 7:404-8.
5. Khullar V. 2003. Outcome assesment. In: Bent AE, Ostergard DR, Cundiff GW, Swift SE, editors. Ostergard's urogynecology and pelvic floor dysfunction. 5th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. pp 51-9.
6. Lemack GE, Zimmern PE. 1999. Predictability of urodynamic findings based on the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 questionnaire. Urology 54:461-6.
7. Nager CW, Albo ME. 2004. Testing in women with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol 47:53-69.
8. Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, et al. 1994. Health-related QOL measures for women with urinary incontinence: The incontinence impact questionnaire and urogenital distress inventory. Qual Life Res 3:291-306.
9. Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, et al. 1995. Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: The incontinence impact questionnaire and urogenital distress inventory. Neurourol Urodyn 14:131-9.
10. Vassalo BJ, Kleeman SD, Segal LJ, et al. 2002. Tension-free vaginal tape: A QOL assessment. Obstet Gynecol 100:518-24.