Ambulatory urodynamic monitoring: Are we wasting our time?

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 413-415

  Patravali, N ^a  

^a GLAN CLWYD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ambulatory urodynamic monitoring; Urinary incontinence

Indexed keywords

AMBULATORY MONITORING; ARTICLE; CYSTOMETRY; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; URINE INCONTINENCE; URODYNAMICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 34547209757     PISSN: 01443615     EISSN: 13646893     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01443610701327487     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Gorton E, Stanton S. 2000. Ambulatory urodynamics: do they help clinical management? British Journal of Obstetric and Gynaecology 107:316-319.
2. van Waalwijk van Doorn E, Anders K, Khullar V, Kulseng-Hanssen S, Pesce F et al. 2000. Standardisation of ambulatory urodynamic monitoring: report of the Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society for Ambulatory Urodynamic Studies. Neurourology and Urodynamics 19:113-125.
3. Vereecken RL. 2000. A critical view on the value of urodynamics in non-neurogenic incontinence in women. International Urogynecology Journal 11:188-195.