Clinical usefulness of ambulatory urodynamics in the diagnosis and treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction

Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 428-432

  Pannek, Jürgen ^a,b   Pieper, Petra ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^b SWISS PARAPLEGIC RESEARCH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Ambulatory urodynamics; Detrusor overactivity; Incontinence; Lower urinary tract dysfunction; Neurogenic bladder dysfunction

Indexed keywords

BOTULINUM TOXIN A; BULKING AGENT; CHOLINERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOM; MALE; NEUROGENIC BLADDER; NEUROMODULATION; OVERACTIVE BLADDER; PELVIS PAIN SYNDROME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATECTOMY; STRESS INCONTINENCE; URINARY DIVERSION; URINARY FREQUENCY; URINARY URGENCY; URINE INCONTINENCE; URINE RETENTION; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 54249166217     PISSN: 00365599     EISSN: 16512065     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00365590802299056     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Rosario DJ, MacDiarmid SA, Radley SC, Chapple CR. A comparison of ambulatory and conventional urodynamic studies in men with borderline outlet obstruction. BJU Int 1999;83:400-9.
2. van Waalwijk van Doorn E, Anders K, Khullar V, Kulseng-Hanssen S, Pesce F, Robertson A, et al. Standardisation of ambulatory urodynamic monitoring: report of the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society for ambulatory urodynamic studies. Neurourol Urodyn 2000;19:113-25.
3. Griffiths CJ, Assi MS, Styles RA, Ramsden PD, Neal DE. Ambulatory monitoring of bladder and detrusor pressure during natural filling. J Urol 1989;142:780-4.
4. Anders K, Cardozo L, Ashman O, Khullar V. Morbidity after ambulatory urodynamics. Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21:461-3.
5. Oh SJ, Son H, Jeong JY, Ku JH. Patients' experience with ambulatory urodynamics. A prospective study. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2006;40:391-6.
6. Oh SJ, Ku JH, Son H, Jeong JY. A comparative study of patient experiences of conventional fluoroscopic and four-hour ambulatory urodynamic studies. Yonsei Med J 2006;31:534-41.
7. Schmidt F, Jorgensen TM, Djurhuus JC. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory urodynamics in healthy young men. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2004; Suppl 215: 75-83
8. Salvatore S, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Anders K, Zocchi G, Soligo M. Evaluating ambulatory urodynamics: a prospective study in asymptomatic women. BJOG 2001;108:107-11.
9. Heslington K, Hilton P. Ambulatory monitoring and conventional cystometry in asymptomatic female volunteers. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:434-41.
10. van Waalwijk van Doorn ES, Ambergen AW, Janknegt RA. Detrusor activity index: quantification of detrusor overactivity by ambulatory monitoring. J Urol 1997;157:596-9.
11. Gorton E, Stanton S. Ambulatory urodynamics: do they help clinical management? BJOG 2000;107:316-9.
12. Brown K, Hilton P. The incidence of detrusor instability before and after colposuspension: a study using conventional and ambulatory urodynamic monitoring. BJU Int 1999;84:962-5.
13. Jamil F, Williamson M, Ahmed YS, Harrison SC. Natural-fill urodynamics in chronically catheterized patients with spinal-cord injury. BJU Int 1999;83:396-9.
14. Ko Y, Malone DC, Armstrong EP. Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of overactive bladder. Pharmacotherapy 2006;26:1694-702.