Modeling the use of durational information in human spoken-word recognition

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 127, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 3758-3770

  Scharenborg, Odette ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC SPEECH; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; LABORATORY ENVIRONMENT; MATRIX WORD; PHONETIC INFORMATION; SPEECH INPUT; SPEECH SIGNALS; WORD RECOGNITION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; VOCABULARY CONTROL;

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUTOMATIC SPEECH RECOGNITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RECOGNITION; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CUES; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPEECH; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH RECOGNITION SOFTWARE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77953557323     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.3377050     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., and Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). " Tracking the time course of spoken-word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models.," J. Mem. Lang. ZZZZZZ 0749-596X 38, 419-439. 10.1006/jmla.1997.2558 (Pubitemid 128348607)
2. Andruski, J. E., Blumstein, S. E., and Burton, M. (1994). " The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access.," Cognition CGTNAU 0010-0277 52, 163-187. 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90042-6
3. Cho, T., McQueen, J. M., and Cox, E. A. (2007). " Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: The case of domain-initial strengthening in English.," J. Phonetics JPHNB9 0095-4470 35, 210-243. 10.1016/j.wocn.2006.03.003
4. Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., and Gaskell, M. G. (2002). " Leading up the lexical garden-path: Segmentation and ambiguity in spoken word recognition.," J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. JPHPDH 0096-1523 28, 218-244. 10.1037/0096-1523.28.1.218
5. Denes, P. (1955). " Effect of duration on the perception of voicing.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. JASMAN 0001-4966 27, 761-764. 10.1121/1.1908020
6. Gaskell, M. G. (2003). " Modelling regressive and progressive effects of assimilation in speech perception.," J. Phonetics JPHNB9 0095-4470 31, 447-463. 10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00012-3 (Pubitemid 37495919)
7. Gaskell, M. G., and Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1996). " Phonological variation and inference in lexical access.," J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. JPHPDH 0096-1523 22, 144-158. 10.1037/0096-1523.22.1.144
8. Gaskell, M. G., and Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1997). " Integrating form and meaning: A distributed model of speech perception.," Lang. Cognit. Processes ZZZZZZ 0169-0965 12, 613-656. 10.1080/016909697386646
9. Gow, D. W. (2002). " Does English coronal place assimilation create lexical ambiguity?," J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. JPHPDH 0096-1523 28, 163-179. 10.1037/0096-1523.28.1.163
10. Gow, D. W., and Gordon, P. C. (1995). " Lexical and prelexical influences on word segmentation: Evidence from priming.," J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. JPHPDH 0096-1523 21, 344-359. 10.1037/0096-1523.21.2.344
11. Gow, D. W., and McMurray, B. (2004). " From sound to sense and back again: The integration of lexical and speech processes.," in Proceedings of From Sound to Sense: 50+ Years of Discoveries in Speech Communication, Boston, MA, pp. 118-132.
12. Jurafsky, D., and Martin, J. H. (2000). Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Speech Recognition, and Computational Linguistics, 1st ed. (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).
13. Kemps, R., Ernestus, M., Schreuder, R., and Baayen, R. H. (2005). " Prosodic cues for morphological complexity: The case of Dutch plural nouns.," Mem. Cognit. MYCGAO 0090-502X 33, 430-446. (Pubitemid 46207070)
14. Klatt, D. H. (1976). " Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. JASMAN 0001-4966 59, 1208-1221. 10.1121/1.380986
15. Lehiste, I. (1970). Suprasegmentals (MIT, Cambridge, MA).
16. Luce, P. A., Goldinger, S. D., Auer, E. T., and Vitevitch, M. S. (2000). " Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN.," Percept. Psychophys. PEPSBJ 0031-5117 62, 615-625.
17. McClelland, J. L., and Elman, J. L. (1986). " The TRACE model of speech perception.," Cognit. Psychol. 18, 1-86. 10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015- 0 0010-0285
18. McQueen, J. M. (2005). " Speech perception.," in The Handbook of Cognition, edited by, K. Lamberts, and, R. Goldstone, (Sage, London), pp. 255-275.
19. Norris, D. (1994). " Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition.," Cognition CGTNAU 0010-0277 52, 189-234. 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90043-4
20. Norris, D., and McQueen, J. M. (2008). " Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition.," Psychol. Rev. PSRVAX 0033-295X 115, 357-395. 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.357
21. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., and Cutler, A. (2000). " Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary.," Behav. Brain Sci. BBSCDH 0140-525X 23, 299-325. 10.1017/S0140525X00003241
22. Oostdijk, N. H. J., Goedertier, W., Van Eynde, F., Boves, L., Martens, J. -P., Moortgat, M., and Baayen, H. (2002). " Experiences from the Spoken Dutch Corpus project.," in Proceedings of LREC-Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, pp. 340-347.
23. Salverda, A. P., Dahan, D., and McQueen, J. M. (2003). " The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension.," Cognition CGTNAU 0010-0277 90, 51-89. 10.1016/S0010- 0277(03)00139-2 (Pubitemid 37338675)
24. Salverda, A. P., Dahan, D., Tanenhaus, M. K., Crosswhite, K., Masharov, M., and McDonough, J. (2007). " Effects of prosodically modulated sub-phonetic variation on lexical competition.," Cognition CGTNAU 0010-0277 105, 466-476. 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.008 (Pubitemid 47361100)
25. Scharenborg, O. (2007). " Reaching over the gap: A review of efforts to link human and automatic speech recognition research.," Speech Commun. SCOMDH 0167-6393 49, 336-347. 10.1016/j.specom.2007.01.009 (Pubitemid 46670364)
26. Scharenborg, O., Norris, D., ten Bosch, L., and McQueen, J. M. (2005). " How should a speech recognizer work?," Cogn. Sci. COGSD5 0364-0213 29, 867-918. 10.1207/s15516709cog0000-37 (Pubitemid 43432311)
27. Scharenborg, O., ten Bosch, L., Boves, L., and Norris, D. (2003). " Bridging automatic speech recognition and psycholinguistics: Extending Shortlist to an end-to-end model of human speech recognition.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. JASMAN 0001-4966 114, 3032-3035. 10.1121/1.1624065 (Pubitemid 37553615)
28. Shatzman, K. B., and McQueen, J. M. (2006a). " Segment duration as a cue to word boundaries in spoken-word recognition.," Percept. Psychophys. PEPSBJ 0031-5117 68, 1-16.
29. Shatzman, K. B., and McQueen, J. M. (2006b). " The modulation of lexical competition by segment duration.," Psychon. Bull. Rev. PBUREN 1069-9384 13, 966-971.
30. Strange, W., Jenkins, J. J., and Johnson, T. L. (1983). " Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. JASMAN 0001-4966 74, 695-705. 10.1121/1.389855
31. Ström, N. (1997). " Phoneme probability estimation with dynamic sparsely connected artificial neural networks.," The Free Speech Journal 5, 1-41.
32. Tanenhaus, M. K., Magnuson, J. S., Dahan, D., and Chambers, C. (2000). " Eye movements and lexical access in spoken-language comprehension: Evaluating a linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistic processing.," J. Psycholinguist. Res. JPLRB7 0090-6905 29, 557-580. 10.1023/A:1026464108329
33. Turk, A. E., and Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2000). " Word-boundary-related duration patterns in English.," J. Phonetics JPHNB9 0095-4470 28, 397-440. 10.1006/jpho.2000.0123