Word-boundary-related duration patterns in English

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 397-440

  Turk, Alice E ^a,b   Shattuck Hufnagel, Stefanie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000885146     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jpho.2000.0123     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Abercrombie D. Syllable quantity and enclitics in English, studies in phonetics and linguistics. 1965, 1st edition; 1971, 3rd edition;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
2. Abercrombie D. Elements of general phonetics. 1967;Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
3. Albrow K. H. The rhythm and intonation of spoken English. 1968;Longmans, London.
4. Barnwell T. P. An algorithm for segment durations in a reading machine context. 1971;Massachusetts Institute of Technology Research Laboratory of Electronics Technical Report. p. 479.
5. Beckman M. E., Edwards J. Lengthenings and shortenings and the nature of prosodic constituency. Kingston J., Beckman M. E. Papers in laboratory phonology I: between the grammar and physics of speech. 1990;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
6. Beckman M. E., Edwards J. Intonational categories and the articulatory control of duration. Tohkura E. V.-B. Y., Sagisaka Y. Speech perception, production, and linguistic structure. 1992;356-375 OHM Publishing Co., Ltd. Tokyo.
7. Beckman M. E., Edwards J., Fletcher J. Prosodic structure and tempo in a sonority model of articulatory dynamics. Docherty G., Ladd D. R. Papers in laboratory phonology II: gesture, segment, tone. 1992;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Berkovits R. Durational effects in final lengthening, gapping, and contrastive stress. Language and Speech. 37:1994;237-250.
9. Booij G. E. Coordination reduction in complex words: a case for prosodic phonology. Hulst H. v. d., Smith N. Advances in nonlinear phonology. 1985;143-160 Foris, Dordrecht.
10. Byrd D., Saltzman E. Intragestural dynamics of multiple prosodic boundaries. Journal of Phonetics. 26:1998;173-199.
11. Byrd D. Articulatory vowel lengthening and coordination at phrasal junctures. Phonetica. 57:2000;3-16.
12. Clark H. H. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: a critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 12:1973;335-359.
13. Cambier-Langeveld. The domain of final lengthening in the production of Dutch. Coerts J., Hoop H. d. Linguistics in the Netherlands. 1997;13-24 John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
14. Cambier-Langeveld T., Turk A. E. A comparison of accentual lengthening in Dutch and English. Journal of Phonetics. 27:1999;255-280.
15. Cooper A. M. Laryngeal and oral gestures in English /p, t, k/. Proceedings of the XIIth international congress of phonetic sciences. 2:1991;Aix-en-Provence. p. 50-53.
16. Cooper W. E., Paccia-Cooper J. Syntax and speech. 1980;Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
17. Eefting W. The effect of "information value" and "accentuation" on the duration of Dutch words, syllables, and segments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 89:1991;412-424.
18. Fougeron C. Variations Articulatoires en Début de Constituants Prosodiques de Différents Niveaux en Français. 1998;Université Paris III-Sorbonne Nouvelle.
19. Fougeron C., Keating P. Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 101:1997;3728-3740.
20. Gussenhoven C. Intonational phrasing and the prosodic hierarchy. Dressler W. U., Luschutsky H. C., Pfeiffer O. E., Rennison J. E. Phonologia. 1988;89-99 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
21. Harris M. S., Umeda N. Effect of speaking mode on temporal factors in speech: vowel duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 56:1984;1016-1018.
22. Hayes, B. 1989, The prosodic hierarchy in meter, Phonetics and phonology, 1, rhythm and meter, P. KiparskyG. Youmans, 201, 259, New York, Academic Press Inc.
23. Hofhuis E., Gussenhoven C., Rietveld A. Final lengthening at prosodic boundaries in Dutch. Proceedings of the XIIIth international congress of phonetic sciences. 1:1995;. p. 154-157.
24. Horne M., Strangert E., Heldner M. Prosodic boundary strength in Swedish: final lengthening and silent interval duration. Proceedings of the XIIIth international congress of phonetic sciences. 1:1995;. p. 170-173.
25. Huggins A. W. F. On isochrony and syntax. Fant G., Tatham M. A. A. Auditory analysis and perception of speech. 1975;455-464 Academic Press, Orlando.
26. Jones D. Chronemes and tonemes. Acta Linguistica. 3:1942-1943;1-10.
27. Jones D. The phoneme: its nature and use. 1950;Heffer, Cambridge.
28. Kahn D. Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. 1976;Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.
29. Klatt D. H. Interaction between two factors that influence vowel duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 54:1973;1102-1104.
30. Klatt D. H. Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in a connected discourse. Journal of Phonetics. 3:1975;129-140.
31. Klatt D. H. Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 59:1976;1208-1220.
32. Klatt D. H., Cooper W. E. Perception of segment duration in sentence contexts. Cohen A., Nooteboom S. Structure and process in speech perception. 1975;69-89 Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
33. Kohler K. Prosodic boundary signals in German. Phonetica. 40:1983;89-134.
34. Krull D. Prepausal lengthening in Estonian: evidence from conversational speech. Lehiste I., Ross J. Estonian prosody: papers from a symposium. 1997;136-148 Tallin Institute of Estonian Language.
35. Ladd D. R. Intonational phrasing: the case of recursive prosodic structure. Phonology Yearbook. 3:1986;311-340.
36. Ladd D. R., Campbell N. Theories of prosodic structure: evidence from syllable duration. Proceedings of the XIIth international congress of phonetic sciences. 2:1991;Aix-en-Provence. p. 290-293.
37. Lehiste. An acoustic-phonetic study of internal open juncture. Phonetica. 5:1960;1-54.
38. Lehiste I. The timing of utterances and linguistic boundaries. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 51:1972;2018-2024.
39. Lehiste I. Rhythmic units and syntactic units in production and perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 54:1973;1228-1234.
40. Lehiste I., Olive J. P., Streeter L. A. Role of duration in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 60:1976;1199-1202.
41. Liberman, M. 1975, The intonational system of English, MIT.
42. Lindblom B. A note on segment duration in Swedish polysyllables. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress Report. 1:1964;1-3.
43. Lindblom, B. 1968, Temporal organization of syllable production, Reports of the 6th International Congress of Acoustics, B29, B30.
44. Lindblom B., Rapp K. Reexamination of the compensatory adjustment of vowel duration in Swedish words. Occasional Papers, University of Essex. 13:1972;204-224.
45. Lindblom B., Rapp K. Some temporal regularities of spoken Swedish. 1973;Papers from the Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm. p. 21.
46. Lindblom B., Lyberg B., Holmgren K. Durational patterns of Swedish phonology: do they reflect short-term motor memory processes? 1981;Indiana Linguistics Club.
47. Maddieson I. Phonetic cues to syllabification. Fromkin V. Phonetic linguistic essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged. 1985;203-221 Academic Press, New York.
48. Nakatani L. H., O'Connor K. D., Aston C. H. Prosodic aspects of American English speech rhythm. Phonetica. 38:1981;84-106.
49. Nespor M., Vogel I. Prosodic phonology. 1986;Foris Publications, Dordrecht.
50. Nooteboom, S. G. 1972, Production and perception of vowel duration: a study of durational properties in Dutch, University of Utrecht.
51. Oller D. K. The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 54:1973;1235-1247.
52. Peperkamp S. Prosodic words. 1997;Holland Academic Graphics, Den Haag.
53. Port R. F. Linguistic timing factors in combination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 61:1981;262-274.
54. Price P. J., Ostendorf M., Shattuck-Hufnagel S., Fong C. The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 90:1991;2956-2970.
55. Price A. Relating to the grid. Linguistic Inquiry. 14:1983;19-100.
56. Selkirk E. O. On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. Fretheim T. Nordic Prosody, II. 1978;111-140 TAPIR, Trondheim.
57. Selkirk E. O. The syllable. Hulst H. v.d., Smith N. The structure of phonological representations (Part II). 1982;Foris Publications, Dordrecht.
58. Selkirk E. O. The prosodic structure of function words. Martin J., Demuth K. Signal to syntax: bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition. 1996;187-213 Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah.
59. Shattuck-Hufnagel S., Turk A. E. A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 25:1996;193-247.
60. Sluijter, A. M. C. 1995, Phonetic correlates of stress and accent, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden.
61. Sluijter A. M. C., van Heuven V. J. Effects of focus distribution, pitch accent and lexical stress on the temporal organization of syllables in Dutch. Phonetica. 52:1995;71-89.
62. Stevens K. N. Diverse acoustic cues at consonantal landmarks. Phonetica. 57:2000;139-151.
63. Turk A. Structural influences on boundary-related lengthening in English. Ohala J. J., Hasegawa Y., Ohala M., Granville D., Bailey A. C. Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. 1999;University of California, Berkeley, San Francisco.
64. Turk A. E., Sawusch J. R. The domain of accentual lengthening in American English. Journal of Phonetics. 25:1997;25-41.
65. Turk A. E., White L. Structural influences on accentual lengthening in English. Journal of Phonetics. 27:1999;171-206.
66. Umeda N. Vowel duration in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 58:1975;434-445.
67. Veilleux N., Shattuck-Hufnagel S. Phonetic modification of the syllable /tu/ in two spontaneous American English dialogues. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Sydney. 1998.
68. Winer B. J., Brown D. R., Michels K. M. Statistical principles in experimental design. 1991;McGraw-Hill, New York.
69. Wightman C. W., Shattuck-Hufnagel S., Ostendorf M., Price P. J. Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 91:1992;1707-1717.
70. Zwicky A. Clitics and particles. Zwicky A., Wallace R. Ohio State working papers in linguistics. 29:1984;148-173.