Effect of inbreeding depression on growth and fluctuating asymmetry in Turkish young males

American Journal of Human Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 557-562

  Özener, Bariş ^a  

^a CUMHURIYET UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT DEVELOPMENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BODY SIZE; CONSANGUINITY; HUMAN; HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; MALE; SOCIAL CLASS; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); EPIDEMIOLOGY; TURKEY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT DEVELOPMENT; BODY MASS INDEX; BODY SIZE; CONSANGUINITY; HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; HUMANS; MALE; SOCIAL CLASS; TURKEY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77953555448     PISSN: 10420533     EISSN: 15206300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.21046     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Alfonso-Sánchez MA, Peña J.A. 2005. Effects of consanguinity on pre-reproductive mortality: Does demographic transition matter? Am J Hum Biol 17:773-786.
2. Al-Gazali LI, Bener A, Abdulrazzaq YM, Micallef R, Al-Khayat AI, Gaber T. 1997. Consanguineous marriages in the United Arab Emirates. J Biosoc Sci 29:491-497.
3. Alper OM, Erengin H, Manguoǧlu AE, Bilgen T, Cetin Z, Dedeoǧlu N, Lüleci G. 2004. Consanguinesous marriages in the province of Antalya, Turkey. Ann Genet 47:129-139.
4. Badaruddoza. 2001. Inbreeding effects on mean of metrical traits among the children of Aligarh in North India. J Hum Ecol 12:457-464.
5. Badaruddoza. 2004. Inbreeding effect on metrical phenotypes among North Indian children. Coll Antropol 28(Suppl):311-318.
6. Bai PVA, John T.J. 1982. The effect of consanguinity on the gestation period and anthropometric traits of the newborn in southern India. Trop Geogr Med 34:225-229.
7. Barrai I, Cavalli-Sforza LL, Mainardim. 1964. Testing a model of dominant inheritance for metric traits in man. Heredity 19:651-668.
8. Ben-David Y, Hershkovitz I, Rupin D, Moscona D, Ring B. 1992. Inbreeding effects on tooth size, eruption age, and dental directional and fluctuating asymmetry among South Sinai Bedouins. In: Smith P, Tchernov E, editors. Structure, function and evolution of teeth. London: Freund Publishing House, Ltd. p 361-389.
9. Bener A, Al-Ali K. 2006. Consanguineous marriage in a newly developed country: The Qatari population. J Biosoc Sci 38:239-246.
10. Bener A, Hussain R, Teebi A.S. 2007. Consanguineous marriages and their effect on common adult disease: Studies from and endogamous population. Med Princ Prac 16:262-267.
11. Bener A, Hussain R. 2006. Consanguineous unions and child health in State Qatar. Pediatr Perinat Epidemiol 20:372-378.
12. Bittles A.H. 2002. The impact of consanguinity on the Indian population. Indian J Hum Genet 8:45-51.
13. Bittles A.H. 2008. A community genetics perspective on consanguineous marriage. Commun Genet 11:324-330.
14. Bogin B. 1999. Patterns of human growth, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
15. Cameron N, Hiernaux J, Jarman S, Marshall WA, Tanner JM, Whitehouse R.H. 1981. Anthropometry. In: Weiner JS, Lourie JA, editors. Practical human biology. London: Academic Press. p 25-52.
16. Carter AJ, Weier TM, Houle D. 2009. The effect of inbreeding on fluctuating asymmetry of wing veins in two laboratory strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 102:563-572.
17. Cohen J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
18. Das B.K. 2005. Inbreeding depression in anthropometric traits among Telaga boys of Kharagpur, West Bengal, India. Coll Antropol 2:459-464.
19. Donbak L. 2004. Consanguinity in Kahramanmaras city, Turkey, and its medical impact. Saudi Med J 25:1991-1994.
20. Doyle WJ, Johnston O. 1977. On the meaning of increased fluctuating dental asymmetry: A cross populational study. Am J Phys Anthropol 46:127-134.
21. Dufour KW, Weatherhead P.J. 1996. Estimation of organism-wide asymmetry in red-winged blackbirds and its relation to studies of mate selection. Proc Biol Sci 263:769-775.
22. El-Hazmi MAF, Al-Swailem AR, Warsy AS, AI-Swailem AM, Sulaimani R, Al-Meshari A.A. 1995. Consanguinity among Saudi Arabian population. J Med Genet 32:623-626.
23. Fişiloǧlu H. 2001. Consanguineous marriage and marital adjustment in Turkey. Family J 9:215-222.
24. Fowler K, Whitlock M.C. 1994. Fluctuating asymmetry does not increase with moderate inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 73:373-376.
25. Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. 1999. Individual differences in developmental precision and fluctuating asymmetry: A model and its implications. J Evol Biol 12:402-416.
26. Gilligan DM, Woodworth LM, Montgomery ME, Nurthen RK, Briscoe DA, Frankham R. 2000. Can fluctuating asymmetry be used to detect inbreeding and loss of genetic diversity in endangered population? Anim Conserv 3:97-104.
27. Hancioǧlu A, Tunçbilek E. 1998. Akraba evlilikleri, sosyodemografik özellikleri ve çocuk ölümleri üzerindeki etkileri. Çocuk Saǧ Hast Derg 41:139-153.
28. Hershkovitz I, Livshits G, Moskona D, Arensburg B, Kobyliansky E. 1993. Variables affecting dental fluctuating asymmetry in human isolates. Am J Phys Anthropol 91:349-365.
29. Hussain R, Bittles AH, Sullivan S. 2001. Consanguinity and early mortality in the Muslim populations of India and Pakistan. Am J Hum Biol 13:777-787.
30. Jaber L, Shohat T, Rotter JI, Shohat M. 1997. Consanguinity and common adult disease in Israeli Arab communities. Am J Med Genet 70:346-348.
31. Khlat M. 1989. Inbreeding effects on fetal growth in Beriut, Lebanon. Am J Phys Anthropol 80:481-484.
32. Kieser JA, Groeneveld HT, Preston C.B. 1985. An odontometric analysis of the Lengua Indian dentition. Hum Biol 57:611-620.
33. Koç I. 2008. Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of consanguineous marriages in Turkey. J Biosoc Sci 40:137-148.
34. Krishnan G. 1975. Effect of parental consanguinity on anthropometric measurements among the Sunni Muslims of Delhi. Res Proc 3:4.
35. Kruuj LE, Slate J, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock T.H. 2003. Fluctuating asymmetry in a secondary sexual trait: No associations with individual fitness, environmental stress or inbreeding, and no heritability. J Evol Biol 16:101-113.
36. Kulkarni ML, Kurian M. 1990. Consanguinity and its effects on fetal growth and development: A South Indian study. J Med Genet 27:348-352.
37. Lens L, van Dongen S, Galbusera P, Schenck T, Matthysen E. 2000. Developmental instability and inbreeding in natural bird populations exposed to different levels of habitat disturbance. J Evol Biol 13:889-896.
38. Leung B, Forbes M.R. 1997. Modelling fluctuating asymmetry in relation to stress and fitness. Oikos 78:397-405.
39. Leung B. 1998. Controlling for allometry in studies of fluctuating asymmetry and quality. Proc Biol Sci 265:1623-1629.
40. Leung B, Forbes MR, Houle D. 2000. Fluctuating asymmetry as a bioindicator of stress: Comparing efficacy of analyses involving multiple traits. Am Nat 155:101-115.
41. Livshits G, Kobyliansky E. 1991. Fluctuating asymmetry as a possible measure of developmental homeostasis in humans: A review. Hum Biol 63:441-466.
42. Lyons EJ, Frodsham AJ, Zhang L, Hill AVS, Amos V. 2009. Consanguinity and susceptibility to infectious diseases in humans. Biol Lett 23:574-576.
43. Markow TA, Martin J.F. 1993. Inbreeding and developmental stability in a small human population. Ann Hum Biol 20:389-394.
44. Martin AO, Kurczynski TW, Steinberg A.G. 1973. Familial studies of medical and anthropometric variables in a human Isolate. Am J Hum Genet 25:581-593.
45. Mokhtar MM, Abdel Fattah M.M. 2001a. Consanguinity and advanced maternal age as risk factors for reproductive losses in Alexandria Egypt. Eur J Epidemiol 17:559-565.
46. Mokhtar MM, Abdel-Fattah M. 2001b. Major birth defects among infants with Down syndrome in Alexandria, Egypt (1995-2000): Trends and risk factors. East Mediterr Health J 7:441-451.
47. Morton N.E. 1958. Empirical risks in consanguineous marriages: Birth weight, gestation time and measurements of infants. Am J Hum Genet 10:344-349.
48. Mukherjee DP, Lakshmanudu M. 1990. Inbreeding depression in stature. Human variation in India. Calcutta: Anthropological Survey in India. p 366-371.
49. Mukherjee D.P. 1982. Inbreeding and genetics of quantitative traits in man. In: Malhotra KC, Basu A, editors. Human genetics and adaptation, Vol.1. Proceedings of the Indian Statistical Institute Golden Jubilee International Conference, Calcutta. p 533-561.
50. Mukherjee A. 1990. Inbreeding effects on bilateral asymmetry of dermatoglyphic patterns. Am J Phys Anthropol 81:77-89.
51. Nijhout HF, Davidowitz G. 2003. Developmental perspectives on phenotiphic variation, canalization, and fluctuating asymmetry. In: Polak M, editor. Developmental stability: Causes and consequences. Oxford University Press: Oxford. p 3-13.
52. Oldfield R.C. 1971. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97-113.
53. Othman H, Saadat M. 2009. Prevalence of consanguineous marriages in Syria. J Biosoc Sci 41:685-692.
54. Paddaiah G, Madlhavi D. 2001. The effect of prenatal consanguinity and inbreeding on the antrhropometric measurements of the newborn babies revisited. Int J Hum Genet 1:187-190.
55. Paddaiah G, Reddy G.G. 1980. Effect of consanguinity on anthropometric measurements in the new born. Indian J Pediatr 47:133-136.
56. Palmer AR, Strobeck C. 1986. Fluctuating asymmetry: Measurement, analysis, patterns. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 17:391-421.
57. Palmer AR, Strobeck C. 1992. Fluctuating asymmetry as a measure of developmental stability: Implications of non-normal distributions and power of statistical tests. Acta Zool Fenn 191:57-72.
58. Palmer AR, Strobeck C. 2003. Fluctuating asymmetry analysis revisited. In: Polak M, editor. Developmental instability: Causes and consequences. Oxford University Press: Oxford. p 279-319.
59. Palmer A.R. 1994. Fluctuating asymmetry analysis: A primer. In: Markow TA, editor. Developmental instability: Its origins and evolutionary implications. Dordrecht: Kluwer. p 335-364.
60. Palmer A.R. 1996. Waltzing with asymmetry. Is fluctuating asymmetry a powerful new tool for biologists or just an alluring new dance step? Bio-Science 46:518-532.
61. Quattro JM, Vrijenhoek R.C. 1989. Fitness differences among remnant populations of the endangered Sonoran topminnow. Science 245:976-978.
62. Rao PS, Inbaraj S.G. 1980. Inbreeding effects on fetal growth and development. J Med Genet 17:27-33.
63. Reddy B.M. 1999. Fluctuating asymmetry and canalization: An appraisal based on a-b ridge counts among Indian populations with diverse backgrounds. Am J Hum Biol 11:367-381.
64. Schaefer K, Lauc T, Mitteroecker P, Gunz P, Bookstein F.L. 2006. Dental arch asymmetry in an isolated Adriatic community. Am J Phys Anthropol 129:132-142.
65. Shami SA, Qadeer T, Schmitt LH, Bittles A.H. 1991. Consanguinity, gestational period and anthropometric measurements at birth in Pakistan. Ann Hum Biol 18:523-527.
66. Sheffer RJ, Hedrick PW, Shirley C. 1998. No bilateral asymmetry in wild caught, endangered Gila topminnows. Heredity 80:214-217.
67. Slatis HM, Hoene R.E. 1961. The effect of consanguinity on the distribution of continuously variable characteristics. Am J Hum Genet 13:28-31.
68. Sokal RR, Rohlf F.J. 1995. Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd ed. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
69. Soulé M.E. 1979. Heterozygosity and developmental stability: Another look. Evolution 33:396-401.
70. Stoltenberg C, Magnus P, Lie RT, Daltveit AK, Irgens L.M. 1998. Influence of consanguinity and maternal education on risk of stillbirth and infant death in Norway, 1967-1993. Am J Epidemiol 148:452-459.
71. Suarez B.K. 1974. Neandertal dental asymmetry and the probable mutation effect. Am J Phys Anthropol 41:411-416.
72. Sueyoshi S, Ohtsuka R. 2003. Effect of polygyny and consenguinity on high fertility in the rural Arab populations in South Jordan. J Biosoc Sci 35:513-526.
73. Tanner JM, Hiernaux J, Jarman S. 1969. Growth and physique studies. In: Weiner JS, Lourie JA, editors. Human biology: A guide to field methods, IBP Handbook No. 9. Oxford: Blackwell Publications. p 315-340.
74. Tunçbilek E, Koç I. 1994. Consanguineous marriage in Turkey and its impact on fertility and mortality. Ann Hum Gen 58:321-329.
75. Tunçbilek E. 2001. Clinical outcomes of consanguineous marriages in Turkey. Turk J Pediatr 43:277-299.
76. Vøllestad LA, Hindar K, Møller A.P. 1999. A meta-analysis of fluctuating asymmetry in relation to heterozygosity. Heredity 83:206-218.
77. Waddington C.H. 1942. Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature 150:563-565.
78. Wilson JM, Manning J.T. 1996. Fluctuating asymmetry and age in children: Evolutionary implications for the control of developmental stability. J Hum Evol 30:529-537.
79. Zakharov V.M. 1992. Population phenogenetics: Analysis of developmental stability in natural populations. Acta Zool Fenn 191:7-30.