Consanguineous Marriage and Marital Adjustment in Turkey

The Family Journal

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 215-222

  Flsloglu, Hürol ^a  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84998090326     PISSN: 10664807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1066480701092021     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Abdulrazzaq, Y. M., Bener, A., al-Gazali, L. I., al-Khayat, A. I., Micallef, R., & Gaber, T. (1997). A study of possible deleterious effects of consanguinity. Clinical Genetics, 51, 167-173.
2. Al-Awadi, S. A., Moussa, M. A., Naguib, K. K., Farag, T. I., Teebi, A. S., el-Khalifa, M., & el-Dossary, L. (1985). Consanguinity among the Kuwaiti population. Clinical Genetics, 27, 483-486.
3. Al-Awadi, S. A., Naguib, K. K., Maussa, M. A., Farag, T. I., Teebi, A. S., & el-Khalifa, M. Y. (1986). The effect of consanguineous marriages on reproductive wastage. Clinical Genetics, 29, 384-388.
4. Al-Gazali, L. I., Sztriha, L., Dawodu, A., Bakir, M., Varghese, M., Varady, E., Scorer, J., Abdulrazzaq, Y. M., Bener, A., & Padmanabhan, R. (1999). Pattern of central nervous system anomalies in a population with a high rate of consanguineous marriages. Clinical Genetics, 55, 95-102.
5. Atalay, B., Kontas, M., Beyazit, S., & veMadenoglu, K. (1992). Türk aile yapuisinin arastirilmasi [Study on Turkish family structure]. Ankara, Turkey: DPT Matbaasi.
6. Aydogan, F.(1994) Van’da kirsal kesimden kente gelen ailelerin evlenmeye iliskin tutum ve davranislarindaki degismeler [Attitude and behaviour change toward marriage in Van]. Aile Kurultayi. Ankara, Turkey: T.C. Basbakanlik Aile Arastirma Kurumu Baskanligi.
7. Badaruddoza, A.(1994). Inbreeding and congenital heart diseases in north Indian populations. Clinical Genetics, 45, 288-291.
8. Baki, A., Karaguzel, A., Beser, E., Cakmakci, T., Ucar, F., & Omeroglu, A. (1992). Consanguineous marriages in the province of Trabzon, Turkey. East African Medical Journal, 69, 94-96.
9. Basaran, N., Hassa, H., Basaran, A., Artan, S., & Stevenson, J. D. (1989). Consanguineous marriages in the Turkish population. Clinical Genetics, 36, 168-173.
10. Basaran, N., Sayli, B. S., Basaran, A., Solak, M., Artan, S., & Stevenson, J. D. (1988). Consanguineous marriages in the Turkish population. Clinical Genetics, 34, 339-341.
11. Bideau, A., Brunet, G., Heyer, E., & Plauchu, H. (1994). Analyzing population structure through the study of consanguinity: The example of the Valserine Valley from the eighteenth century to the present. Population, 49, 145-146.
12. Bittles, A. H., Coble, J. M., & Rao, N. A. (1993). Trends in consanguineous marriages in Karnataka, South India, 1980-1989. Journal of Biosocial Science, 25, 111-116.
13. Bittles, A. H., Mason, W. M., Greene, J., & Rao, N. A. (1991). Reproductive behavior and health in consanguineous marriages. Science, 252, 789-794.
14. Casas, J. M., & Ortiz, S. (1985). Exploring the applicability of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for assessing level of marital adjustment with Mexican Americans. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 1023-1027.
15. Chakraborty, R., & Chakravarti, A. (1977). On consanguineous marriages and genetic load. Human Genetics, 36, 47-54.
16. Coleman, D. A.(1980). A note on the frequency of consanguineous marriages in Reading, England in 1972/1973. Human Heredity, 30, 278-285.
17. Constantine, L. L.(1986). Family paradigms: The practice of theory in family therapy. New York: Guilford.
18. Crane, R., Allgood, S. M., Larson, J. H., & Griffin, W. (1990). Assessing marital quality with distressed and nondistressed couples: A comparison and equivalency table for three frequently used measures. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 87-93.
19. Dyer, D. E.(1983). Courtship, marriage, and family: American style. Home-wood, IL: Dorsey.
20. el-Hazmi, M. A., al-Swailem, A. R., Warsy, A. S., al-Swailem, A. M., Sulaimani, R., & al-Meshari, A. A. (1995). Consanguinity among the Saudi Arabian population. Journal of Medical Genetics, 32, 623-626.
21. Fisloglu, H. (1990). Perceived family cohesion and its relationship to perceived marital adjustment in married graduate students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.
22. Fisloglu, H., & Demir, A. (2000). Applicability of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for measurement of marital quality with Turkish couples. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(3), 214-218.
23. Fowers, B. J.(in press). Beyond the myth of marital happiness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24. Frankenberg, S. R.(1990). Kinship and mate choice in a historic eastern Blue Ridge community, Madison County, Virginia. Human Biology, 62, 817-835.
25. Givens, B. P., & Hirschman, C. (1994). Modernization and consanguineous marriage in Iran. Journal of Marriage and Family, 56, 820-834.
26. Gökçe, B.(1991). Evlilik kurumuna sosyolojik bir yaklasim [A sociological approach to institute of marriage]. B. Dilekçigil, A., ve Çigdem (Eds.), Aile yaz lar: Evlilik kurumu ve iliskileri. Ankara, Turkey: T.C. Basbakanl k Aile Arast, rma Kurumu Baskanl, g*, Yay, nlar,.
27. Goode, W. J.(1993). World changes in divorce patterns. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28. Güvenç, B.(1972). Insan ve kültür [Individual and culture]. Ankara, Turkey.
29. Guz, K., Dedeoglu, N., & Luleci, G. (1989). The frequency and medical effects of consanguineous marriages in Antalya, Turkey. Hereditas, 111, 79-83.
30. Hafez, M., El-Tahan, H., Awadalla, M., El-Khayat, H., Abdel-Gafer, A., & Ghoneim, M. (1983). Consanguineous matings in the Egyptian population. Journal of Medical Genetics, 20, 58-60.
31. Hancioglu, A., & Tunçbilek, E. (1998). Akraba evlilikleri, sosyo-demografik özellikleri ve çocuk ölümleri üzerine etkileri: 1993 Türkiye nüfus ve sagl, k arast, rmalar, bulgular, [Consanguineous marriage, sociodemographic characteristics, and effect on infant death: Results of 1993 Turkish demographic and health survey]. Çocuk Sag l, g, ve Hastal klar Dergisi, 41, 139-153.
32. Hussain, R., & Bittles, A. H. (1999). Consanguineous marriage and differentials in age at marriage, contraceptive use and fertility in Pakistan. Journal of Biosocial Science, 31, 121-138.
33. Imaizumi, Y.(1986a). A recent survey of consanguineous marriages in Japan. Clinical Genetics, 30, 230-233.
34. Imaizumi, Y.(1986b). Factors influencing the frequency of consanguineous marriages in Japan: Marital distance and opportunity of encounter. Human Heredity, 36, 304-309.
35. Imaizumi, Y., & Kaneko, R. (1997). Surname and consanguineous marriage in Japan. Journal of Biosocial Science, 29, 401-413.
36. Jaber, L., Bailey-Wilson, J. E., Haj-Yehia, M., Hernandez, J., & Shohat, M. (1994). Consanguineous matings in an Israeli-Arab community. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 148, 412-415.
37. Jorde, L. B., & Pitkanen, K. J. (1991). Inbreeding in Finland. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 84, 127-139.
38. Kerlinger, F.(1973). Foundations of behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
39. Khoury, S. A., & Massad, D. (1992). Consanguineous marriage in Jordan. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 43, 769-775.
40. Kulkarni, M. L., & Kurian, M. (1990). Consanguinity and its effect on fetal growth and development: A south Indian study. Journal of Medical Genetics, 27, 348-352.
41. Lebel, R. R.(1983). Consanguinity studies in Wisconsin I: Secular trends in consanguineous marriage, 1843-1981. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 15, 543-560.
42. McCullough, J. M., & O’Rourke, D. H. (1986). Geographic distribution of consanguinity in Europe. Annals of Human Biology, 13, 359-367.
43. Minuchin, S.(1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44. O’Leary, K. D.(1987). The emergency of marital assessment. In K. D. O’Leary (Ed.), Assessment of marital discord: An integration for research and clinical practice (pp. 1-12). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45. Sayl, B. S., & Arslanöz, A. (1991). Anadolu’nun genetik yap, s, üzerine çal, smalar: VI. Akraba evliliklerine iliskin yeni bulgular [Studies on the genetic structure of Anatolia: New findings on consanguineous marriage]. In B. Dilekçigil & A. ve Çigdem (Eds.), Aile yazilari: Evlilik kurumu ve iliskileri. Ankara, Turkey: T.C. Basbakanlik Aile Arastirma Kurumu Baskanligi Yayinlari.
46. Shami, S. A., Grant, J. C., & Bittles, A. H. (1994). Consanguineous marriage within social/occupational class boundaries in Pakistan. Journal of Biosocial Science, 26, 91-96.
47. Shek, D. T. L.(1994). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Psychologia, 37(1), 7-17.
48. Shiloh, S., Reznik, H., Bat-Miriam-Katznelson, M., & Goldman, B. (1995). Pre-marital genetic counseling to consanguineous couples: Attitudes, beliefs and decisions among counseled, noncounseled and unrelated couples in Israel. Social Science and Medicine, 41, 1301-1310.
49. Smith, M. T., Asquith-Charlton, R. M., Blodwell, L. M., Clements, C. M., & Ellam, C. J. (1993). Estimating inbreeding from the Faculty Office Registers, 1534-1540. Annals of Human Biology, 20, 357-368.
50. Spanier, G. B.(1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: A new scale for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28.
51. State Institute of Statistics, Prime Ministry, Republic of Turkey. (1997). Statistics of Turkey. Ankara, Turkey: State Institute of Statistics, Printing Division.
52. Stoltenberg, C., Magnus, P., Skrondal, A., & Lie, R. T. (1999). Consanguinity and recurrent risk of stillbirth and infant death. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 517-523.
53. Tezcan, M.(1991). K, rsal topluluklar, mizda tercihli evlilik tiplerinin islevsel çözümlenisi [Study on marriage types in rural areas]. In B. Dilekçigil & A. ve Çigdem (Eds.), Aile yaz, lar: Evlilik kurumu ve iliskileri. Ankara, Turkey: T.C. Basbakanl, k Aile Arast, rma Kurumu Baskanl, g, Yay, nlar,.
54. Touliatos, J., Perlmutter, B. F., & Straus, M. A. (Eds.). (1990). Handbook of family measurement techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
55. Tunçbilek, E., & Koç, I. (1994). Consanguineous marriage in Turkey and its impact on fertility and mortality. Annals of Human Genetics, 58, 321-329.
56. Wahab, A., & Ahmad, M. (1996). Biosocial perspective of consanguineous marriages in rural and urban Swat, Pakistan. Journal of Biosocial Science, 28, 305-313.
57. Yaqoob, M., Gustavson, K. H., Jalil, F., Karlberg, J., & Iselius, L. (1993). Early child health in Lahore, Pakistan: II. Inbreeding. Acta Paediatr (Suppl. 82), 17-26.