Wanting to travel, more or less: Exploring the determinants of the deficit and surfeit of personal travel

Transportation

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 135-164

  Choo, Sangho ^a   Collantes, Gustavo O ^a   Mokhtarian, Patricia L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Affinity for travel; Ordered probit; Positive utility of travel; Travel attitudes

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TRANSPORTATION;

PERSONAL TRAVEL; POLICY MAKING; SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS; TRAVEL ATTITUDES;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; COMMUTING; MOBILITY; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; SAN FRANCISCO; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EID: 13444293349     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-004-2219-8     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Cao X & Mokhtarian PL (forthcoming) How do individuals adapt their personal travel? Objective and subjective influences on the consideration of travel-related strategies. Transport Policy.
2. S Choo PL Mokhtarian 2004 What type of vehicle do people drive The role of attitude and lifestyle in influencing vehicle type choice. Transportation Research A 38 3 201-222
3. S Choo GO Collantes PL Mokhtarian 2001 Modeling Individual's Relative Desired Travel Amounts. Institute of Transportation Studies University of California Davis Publication No. UCD-ITS-RR-01-13. Available on the Internet at http://its.ucdavis.edu/publications/2001/RR-01-13.pdf
4. MJ Clay PL Mokhtarian 2004 Personal travel management: The adoption and consideration of travel-related strategies Transportation Planning and Technology 27 3 181-209
5. GO Collantes PL Mokhtarian 2002 Determinants of Subjective Assessments of Personal Mobility. Institute of Transportation Studies University of California Davis Publication No. UCD-ITS-RR-02-11. Available on the Internet at www.its.ucdavis.edu/publications/2002/RR-02-11.pdf
6. Curry RW (2000 Attitudes toward Travel: The Relationships among Perceived Mobility, Travel Liking, and Relative Desired Mobility. Master's Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, June. Available on the Internet at http://its.ucdavis.edu/publications/2002/rr-00-06.pdf
7. WH Greene 1995 LIMDEP Version 7.0 User's Manual Econometric Software Bellport, NY
8. G Hupkes 1982 The law of constant travel time and trip-rates Futures 14 38-46
9. PM Jones 1978 Destination choice and travel attributes In: D Hensher & Q Dalvi (eds) Determinants of Travel Choice Praeger New York 266-311
10. P Kennedy 1998 A Guide to Econometrics 4th edition MIT Press MA:CAmbridge
11. RD McKelvey W Zavoina 1975 A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables Journal of Mathematical Sociology 4 1 103-120
12. PL Mokhtarian I Salomon LS Redmond 2001 Understanding the demand for travel: It's not purely "derived" Innovation The European Journal of Social Science Research 14 4 355-380
13. PL Mokhtarian I Salomon 2001 How derived is the demand for travel Some conceptual and measurement considerations Transportation Research A 35 8 695-719
14. DT Ory PL Mokhtarian I Salomon LS Redmond GO Collantes S Choo 2004 When is commuting desirable to the individual? Growth and Change 35 3 334-359
15. Redmond LS (2000) Identifying and Analyzing Travel-related Attitudinal, Personality, and Lifestyle Clusters in the San Francisco Bay Area.Master's Thesis, Transportation Technology and Policy Graduate Group, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, September. Available on the Internet at http://its.ucdavis.edu/publications/2002/RR-08-08.pdf
16. LS Redmond PL Mokhtarian 2001 The positive utility of the commute: Modeling ideal commute time and relative desired commute amount Transportation 28 2 179-205
17. S Reichman 1976 Travel adjustments and life styles - A behavioral approach In: PR Stopher & AH Meyburg (eds) Behavioral Travel-Demand Models MA: Lexington Books Lexington (pp143-152).
18. I Salomon PL Mokhtarian 1998 What happens when mobility-inclined market segments face accessibility-enhancing policies Transportation Research D 3 3 129-140
19. Schwanen T & Mokhtarian PL (2004) The extent and determinants of dissonance between actual and preferred residential neighborhood type. Environment and Planning B 31.
20. SG Stradling ML Meadows S Beatty 2000 Helping drivers out of their cars: Integrating transport policy and social psychology for sustainable change Transport Policy 7 207-215
21. 2 in the ordinal probit model Journal of Mathematical Sociology 16 4 333-342