Open areas in a landscape enhance pollen-mediated gene flow of a tree species: Evidence from northern Switzerland

Landscape Ecology

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 903-911

  Kamm, U ^a,b,c   Gugerli, F ^a   Rotach, P ^b   Edwards, P ^b   Holderegger, R ^a  

^a SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL   (Switzerland)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c BERN UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Functional connectivity; Insect pollination; LAD regression; Landscape genetics; Paternity analysis; Pollen dispersal; Switzerland

Indexed keywords

CONNECTIVITY; DICOTYLEDON; DISPERSAL; FUNCTIONAL CHANGE; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIATION; HABITAT CONSERVATION; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; INSECT; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; PATERNITY; POLLEN; POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS;

SWITZERLAND;

HEXAPODA; SORBUS; SORBUS DOMESTICA;

EID: 77953538738     PISSN: 09212973     EISSN: 15729761     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-010-9468-z     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Austerlitz F, Dick CW, Dutech C, Klein EK, Oddou-Muratorio S, Smouse PE, Sork VL (2004) Using genetic markers to estimate the pollen dispersal curve. Mol Ecol 13: 937-954.
2. Bradshaw RHW, Hannon GE, Lister AM (2003) A long-term perspective on ungulate-vegetation interactions. For Ecol Manag 181: 267-280.
3. Brütsch U, Rotach P (1992) Der Speierling (Sorbus domestica) in der Schweiz: Verbreitung, Ökologie, Standortsansprüche, Konkurrenzkraft und waldbauliche Eignung. Schweiz Z Forstwes 144: 967-991.
4. Cade BS, Noon BR (2003) A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologists. Front Ecol Environ 1: 412-420.
5. Cade BS, Richards JD (1996) Permutation tests for least absolute deviation regression. Biometrics 52: 886-902.
6. Cade BS, Richards JD (2005) User Manual for BLOSSOM Statistical Software. U. S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins.
7. Cushman SA, McKelvey KS, Hayden J, Schwartz MK (2006) Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modelling. Am Nat 168: 486-499.
8. Franke A, Dagenbach H (1995) Der Speierling ein seltener Baum in Wald und Flur. LG-Stiftung Natur und Umwelt, Stuttgart.
9. Gram WK, Sork VL (2001) Association between environmental and genetic heterogeneity in forest tree populations. Ecology 82: 2012-2021.
10. Greenleaf SS, Williams NM, Winfree R, Kremen C (2007) Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia 153: 589-596.
11. Hamrick JL (2004) Response of forest trees to global environmental changes. For Ecol Manag 197: 323-335.
12. Holderegger R, Wagner HH (2008) Landscape genetics. Bioscience 58: 199-207.
13. Janzen DH (1971) Euglossine bees as long-distance pollinators of tropical plants. Science 171: 203-205.
14. Jenness J (2006) Surface Tools (surf_tools. avx) extension for ARCView 3. x, V1. 6a. Jenness Enterprises. http://www. jennessent. com/arcview/surface_tools. htm.
15. Kamm U, Rotach P, Gugerli F, Siroky M, Edwards PJ, Holderegger R (2009) Frequent long-distance gene flow in a rare temperate forest tree (Sorbus domestica) on the landscape scale. Heredity 103: 476-482.
16. Kreyer D, Oed A, Walther-Hellwig K, Frankl R (2004) Are forests potential landscape barriers for foraging bumblebees? Landscape scale experiments with Bombus terrestris agg. and Bombus pascuorum (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Biol Conserv 116: 111-118.
17. Kutzelnigg H (1995) Sorbus. In: Scholz H (ed) Gustav Hegi - Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Berlin, pp 328-385.
18. Kwak MM, Velterop O, van Andel J (1998) Pollen and gene flow in fragmented habitats. Appl Veg Sci 1: 37-54.
19. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam. Program available at: www. bio. umontreal. ca/Casgrain/en/labo/corr_permute. html.
20. Lowe AJ, Boshier D, Ward M, Bacles CFE, Navarro C (2005) Genetic resource impacts of habitat loss and degradation; reconciling empirical evidence and predicted theory for neotropical trees. Heredity 95: 255-273.
21. Manel S, Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2003) Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 189-197.
22. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7: 639-655.
23. McRae BH (2006) Isolation by resistance. Evolution 60: 1551-1561.
24. Meagher T (1986) Analysis of paternity within a natural population of Chamaelirium luteum. 1. Identification of most-likely male parents. Am Nat 128: 199-215.
25. Nason JD, Herre EA, Hamrick JL (1998) The breeding structure of a tropical keystone plant resource. Nature 391: 685-687.
26. Oddou-Muratorio S, Klein EK, Demesure-Musch B, Austerlitz F (2006) Real-time patterns of pollen flow in the wild-service tree, Sorbus torminalis (Rosaceae). III. Mating patterns and the ecological maternal neighborhood. Am J Bot 93: 1650-1659.
27. Raspé O, Findlay C, Jacquemart A-L (2000) Biological flora of the British Isles: Sorbus aucuparia L. J Ecology 88: 910-930.
28. Schrott GR, With KA, King AW (2005) On the importance of landscape history for assessing extinction risk. Ecol Appl 15: 493-506.
29. Sork VL, Nason J, Campbell DR, Fernandez JF (1999) Landscape approaches to historical and contemporary gene flow in plants. Trends Ecol Evol 14: 219-224.
30. Steffan-Dewenter I, Kuhn A (2003) Honeybee foraging in differentially structured landscapes. Proc R Soc Lond B 270: 569-575.
31. Steffan-Dewenter I, Munzenberg U, Burger C, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2002) Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83: 1421-1432.
32. Storfer A, Murphy MA, Evans JS, Goldberg CS, Robinson S, Spear SF, Dezzani R, Delmelle E, Vierling L, Waits LP (2007) Putting the 'landscape' in landscape genetics. Heredity 98: 128-142.
33. Townsend PA, Levey DJ (2005) An experimental test of whether habitat corridors affect pollen transfer. Ecology 86: 466-475.
34. White GM, Boshier DH, Powell W (2002) Increased pollen flow counteracts fragmentation in a tropical dry forest: an example from Swietenia humilis (Zuccarini). PNAS 99: 2038-2042.
35. Whitlock MC, McCauley DE (1999) Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: Fst ≠ 1/(4Nm + 1). Heredity 82: 117-125.
36. Winfree R, Griswold T, Kremen C (2007) Effect of human disturbance on bee communities in a forested ecosystem. Conserv Biol 21: 213-223.
37. Winston ML (1987) The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press, Boston.
38. Young A, Boyle T, Brown T (1996) The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol 11: 413-418.