Heterogeneous response dynamics in retinal ganglion cells: The interplay of predictive coding and adaptation

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 103, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 3184-3194

  Nirenberg, Sheila ^a   Bomash, Illya ^a   Pillow, Jonathan W ^b   Victor, Jonathan D ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; NERVE CELL MEMBRANE CONDUCTANCE; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA GANGLION CELL; SENSORY SYSTEM; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ANIMALS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FOURIER ANALYSIS; MICE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RETINA; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS;

EID: 77953530710     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00878.2009     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Atick JJ, Redlich AN. Towards a theory of early visual processing. Neural Comput 2: 308-320, 1990.
2. Atick JJ, Redlich AN. What does the retina know about natural scenes. Neural Comput 4: 196-210, 1992.
3. Balasubramanian V, Sterling P. Receptive fields and functional architecture in the retina. J Physiol 587: 2753-2767, 2009.
4. Barlow HB. Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. In: Sensory Communication, edited by Rosenblith WA. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1961, p. 217-234.
5. Benardete EA, Kaplan E. The dynamics of primate M retinal ganglion cells. Vis Neurosci 16: 355-368, 1999.
6. Borst A, Flanagin VL, Sompolinsky H. Adaptation without parameter change: dynamic gain control in motion detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 6172-6176, 2005.
7. Brenner N, Bialek W, de Ruyter van Steveninck R. Adaptive rescaling maximizes information transmission. Neuron 26: 695-702, 2000.
8. Carcieri SM, Jacobs AL, Nirenberg S. Classification of retinal ganglion cells: a statistical approach. J Neurophysiol 90: 1704-1713, 2003.
9. Chichilnisky EJ. A simple white noise analysis of neuronal light responses. Network 12: 199-213, 2001.
10. Dan Y, Atick JJ, Reid RC. Efficient coding of natural scenes in the lateral geniculate nucleus: experimental test of a computational theory. J Neurosci 16: 3351-3362, 1996. (Pubitemid 26142367)
11. Dedek K, Pandarinath C, Alam NM, Wellershaus K, Schubert T, Willecke K, Prusky GT, Weiler R, Nirenberg S. Ganglion cell adaptability: does the coupling of horizontal cells play a role? PLoS One 3: , 2008.
12. Diamantaras KI, Hornik K, Strintzis MG. Optimal linear compression under unreliable representation and robust PCA neural models. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 10: 1186-1195, 1999.
13. Dong DW, Atick JJ. Statistics of natural time-varying images. Network Comput Neural Syst 6: 345-358, 1995a.
14. Dong DW, Atick JJ. Temporal decorrelation: a theory of lagged and nonlagged responses in the lateral geniculate-nucleus. Network Comput Neural Syst 6: 159-178, 1995b.
15. Dowling JE. Organization of vertebrate retinas: The Jonas M. Friedenwald Memorial Lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 9: 655-680, 1970.
16. Fairhall AL, Lewen GD, Bialek W, de Ruyter Van Steveninck RR. Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code. Nature 412: 787-792, 2001.
17. Famulare M, Fairhall A. Feature selection in simple neurons: how coding depends on spiking dynamics. Neural Comput 22: 581-598, 2010.
18. Fee MS, Mitra PP, Kleinfeld D. Automatic sorting of multiple unit neuronal signals in the presence of anisotropic and non-Gaussian variability. J Neurosci Methods 69: 175-188, 1996.
19. Gaudry KS, Reinagel P. Benefits of contrast normalization demonstrated in neurons and model cells. J Neurosci 27: 8071-8079, 2007a.
20. Gaudry KS, Reinagel P. Contrast adaptation in a nonadapting LGN model. J Neurophysiol 98: 1287-1296, 2007b.
21. Geisler WS. Visual perception and the statistical properties of natural scenes. Annu Rev Psychol 59: 167-192, 2008.
22. Hosoya T, Baccus SA, Meister M. Dynamic predictive coding by the retina. Nature 436: 71-77, 2005.
23. Laughlin S. A simple coding procedure enhances a neuron's information capacity. Z Naturforsch C 36: 910-912, 1981.
24. Lesica NA, Jin J, Weng C, Yeh CI, Butts DA, Stanley GB, Alonso JM. Adaptation to stimulus contrast and correlations during natural visual stimulation. Neuron 55: 479-491, 2007.
25. Mante V, Frazor RA, Bonin V, Geisler WS, Carandini M. Independence of luminance and contrast in natural scenes and in the early visual system. Nat Neurosci 8: 1690-1697, 2005.
26. Mitra P, Bokil H. Observed Brain Dynamics. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press, 2008.
27. Murphy GJ, Rieke F. Network variability limits stimulus-evoked spike timing precision in retinal ganglion cells. Neuron 52: 511-524, 2006.
28. Ohzawa I, Sclar G, Freeman RD. Contrast gain control in the cat's visual system. J Neurophysiol 54: 651-667, 1985. (Pubitemid 16217253)
29. Pandarinath C, Victor JD, Nirenberg S. Symmetry breakdown in the ON and OFF pathways of the retina at night: functional implications. Program No. 848.6, 2009 Neuroscience Meeting Planner. Washington, DC: Society for Neuroscience, 2009. Online.
30. Paninski L. Maximum likelihood estimation of cascade point-process neural encoding models. Network 15: 243-262, 2004. (Pubitemid 39586479)
31. Pillow JW, Shlens J, Paninski L, Sher A, Litke AM, Chichilnisky EJ, Simoncelli EP. Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population. Nature 454: 995-999, 2008.
32. Rodieck R. The Vertebrate Retina: Principles of Structure and Function. San Francisco, CA: Freeman, 1973.
33. Shannon C. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27: 379-423, 1948.
34. Shapley RM, Victor JD. The effect of contrast on the transfer properties of cat retinal ganglion cells. J Physiol 285: 275-298, 1978. (Pubitemid 9083845)
35. Shapley RM, Victor JD. How the contrast gain control modifies the frequency responses of cat retinal ganglion cells. J Physiol 318: 161-179, 1981.
36. Sharpee TO, Sugihara H, Kurgansky AV, Rebrik SP, Stryker MP, Miller KD. Adaptive filtering enhances information transmission in visual cortex. Nature 439: 936-942, 2006.
37. Srinivasan MV, Laughlin SB, Dubs A. Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 216: 427-459, 1982. (Pubitemid 13218774)
38. Wark B, Fairhall A, Rieke F. Timescales of inference in visual adaptation. Neuron 61: 750-761, 2009.
39. Zaghloul KA, Boahen K, Demb JB. Different circuits for ON and OFF retinal ganglion cells cause different contrast sensitivities. J Neurosci 23: 2645-2654, 2003. (Pubitemid 36418599)
40. Zemon V, Gordon J, Welch J. Asymmetries in ON and OFF visual pathways of humans revealed using contrast-evoked cortical potentials. Vis Neurosci 1: 145-150, 1988.