Dialogue in or with the peer review? evaluating research organizations in order to promote organizational learning

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 239-251

  Hansson, Finn ^a  

^a Copenhagen Business School ^*  (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEARNING; RESEARCH INSTITUTION; RESEARCH WORK;

EID: 77953260432     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234210X496600     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Barré, Rémi 2001. Sense and nonsense of S&T productivity indicators. Science and Public Policy, 28(4), August, 259-266.
2. Bornmann, Lutz 2008. Scientific peer review. an analysis of the peer review process from the perspective of sociology of science theories. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge, 6(2), 23-38.
3. Bornmann, Lutz and Hans-Dieter Daniel 2009. The luck of the referee draw: the effect of exchanging reviews. Learned Publishing, 22(2), 117-125.
4. Brown, John Seely and Paul Duguid 1991. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science special issue: Organizational Learning: Papers in Honor of and by James G March, 2(1), 40-57.
5. Brunsson, Nils 1989. The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Deci- sions and Actions in Organizations. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
6. Brunsson, Nils and Bengt Jacobsson 2000. A World of Standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Bryant, Christopher G A 1995. Practical Sociology. Post-empiricism and the Reconstruction of Theory and Application. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8. Butler, Linda 2007. Assessing university research: a plea for a balanced approach. Science and Public Policy, 34(8), October, 565-574.
9. Chubin, Daryl E and Edward J Hackett 1990. Peerless Science. New York: State University of New York Press.
10. Cicchetti, Dominic 1991. The reliability of peer review for manu- script and grant submission. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(14), 119-186.
11. Cole, Stephen 1992. Making Science: Between Nature and Socety. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
12. Cousins, J Bradley and Elizabeth Whitmore 1998. Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 80, 5-23.
13. Donovan, Claire 2007. The qualitative future of research evaluation. Science and Public Policy, 34(8), October, 585-597.
14. Etzkowitz, Henry and Loet Leydesdorff 2000. The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and 'Mode 2' to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-123.
15. Feller, Irwin 2007. Mapping the frontiers of evaluation of public sector R&D programs. Science and Public Policy, 34(10), December, 681-690.
16. Final Report of the Expert Group, EC 2002. Benchmarking S&T Productivity. , last accessed 24 September 2009.
17. Foss Hansen, Hanne and Finn Borum 2000. The local construction 250 and enactment of standards for research evaluation: the case of the Copenhagen Business School. Evaluation, 6(3), July, 281-299.
18. Fuller, Steve 2000. Thomas Kuhn: a Philosophical History for Our Times. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Georghiou, Luke 2007. What lies beneath: avoiding the risk of under-evaluation. Science and Public Policy, 34(10), December, 743-752.
20. Greene, Jennifer C 2001. Dialogue in evaluation: a relational perspective. Evaluation, 7(2), 181-187.
21. Hessels, Laurens K and Harro van Lente 2008. Re-thinking new knowledge production: a literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 37(4), 740-760.
22. Irwin, Alan 1995. Citizen Science: a Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. London: Routledge.
23. Karlsson, Ove 1996. A critical dialogue in evaluation: how can the interaction between evaluation and politics be tackled? Evaluation, 2(4), 405-416.
24. Kostoff, Ronald N 2001. Book review: The metrics of science and technology. Scientometrics, 50(2), 353-361.
25. Knorr-Cetina, Karin D 1981. Manufacture of Knowledge: an Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Kuhn, Thomas S 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Larédo, Philippe 2001. Benchmarking of RTD policies in Europe: 'research collectives' as an entry point for renewed comparative analysis. Science and Public Policy, 28(4), August, 285-294.
28. Larédo, Philippe 2003. Six major changes facing public interven- tion in higher education, science, technology and innovation. Science and Public Policy, 30(1), February, 4-12.
29. Latour, Bruno and Steve Woolgar 1986. Laboratory Life: the Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
30. Maasen, Sabine and Oliver Lieven 2006. Transdisciplinarity: a new mode of governing science? Science and Public Policy, 33(6), July, 399-410.
31. March, James G 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organiza- tional learning. Organization Science special issue: Organizational Learning: Papers in Honor of and by James G March, 2(1), 71-87.
32. Mayntz, Renate and Uwe Schimank 1998. Linking theory and practice: introduction. Research Policy, 27, 747-755.
33. Merton, Robert K 1938. Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321-337.
34. Merton, Robert K 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
35. Merton, Robert K and Harriet Zuckerman 1971. Institutionalized patterns of evaluation in science. Minerva, 9, 1.
36. Mouritsen, Jan 2004. Measuring and intervening. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(2), 257-267.
37. Mouritsen, Jan 2006. Problematising intellectual capital research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(6), 820-841.
38. Münch, Richard 2007. Die akademische Elite. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
39. Nedeva, Maria and Rebecca Boden 2006. Changing science: the advent of neo-liberalism. Prometheus, 24(3), 269-281.
40. Nightingale, Paul and Alister Scott 2007. Peer review and the relevance gap: ten suggestions for policy-makers. Science and Public Policy, 34(8), October, 543-553.
41. Nonaka, Ikujiro, Ryoko Toyama and Noboru Konno 2000. SECI, ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33, 1.
42. Nowotny, Helga, Michael Gibbons and Peter Scott 2001. Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Oxford: Polity Press.
43. Power, Michael 1997. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Power, Michael 2007. Research evaluation in the audit society. In Wissenschaft unter Beobachtung, eds Hildegard Matthies and Dagmar Simon, pp. 15-24. Sonderheft 24: Leviathan.
45. Ravetz, J R 1999. What is post-normal science. Futures, 647-653.
46. Schriven, Michael 1997. Truth and objectivity in evaluation. In Evaluation for the 21st Century: a Handbook, eds Eleanor Chelimsky and William R Shadish, ch. 33, pp. 477-500. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
47. Schwandt, Thomas A 2001. Understanding dialogue as practice. Evaluation, 7(2) 228-237.
48. Schwandt, Thomas A 2007. Judging interpretations. New Directions for Evaluation, 114, 11-26.
49. Stake, Robert E 2004. Standards-based and Responsive Evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
50. Strathern, Marilyn 2003. Re-describing society. Minerva, 41(3), 263-276.
51. Vedung, Evert 1997. Public Policy and Program Evaluation. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
52. Ware, M 2008a. Peer Review: Benefits, Perspectives and Alterna- tives. London: Publishing Research Consortium.
53. Ware, M 2008b. Peer review in Scholarly Journal: Perspective of the Scholarly Community - an International Study. London: Publishing Research Consortium.
54. Weiss, Carol Hirschon 1999. The interface between evaluation and public policy. Evaluation, 5(4), 468-486.
55. Weiss, Carol Hirschon and Michael Bucuvalas 1980. Social Science Research and Decision Making. New York: Columbia University Press.
56. Ziman, John 2000. Real Science: What It Is and What It Means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.