The Local Construction and Enactment of Standards for Research Evaluation: The Case of the Copenhagen Business School

Evaluation

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 281-299

  Borum, Finn ^a   Hansen, Hanne Foss ^b  

^a Department of International Economics and Management   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

conflict; coordination; enactment; evaluation; local issues; standards

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937321263     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: 14617153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/13563890022209299     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Borum, F. and A. Westenholz (1995) ‘The Incorporation of Multiple Institutional Models: Organizational Field Multiplicity and the Role of Actors’, in Richard W. Scott and Søren Christensen (eds) The Institutional Construction of Organizations.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
2. Brunsson, Nils and Bengt Jacobsson (eds) (1998) Standardisering.Stockholm: Nerenius and Santérius.
3. Christiansen, John and Hanne Foss Hansen (1993) Forskningsevaluering i teori og praksis. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
4. Cohen, M. D., James G. March and Johan P. Olsen (1972) ‘A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice’, Administrative Science Quarterly17: 1–25.
5. Cyert, R. M. and J. G. March (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. DiMaggio, Paul and Walter Powell (1991) ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, in Walter Powell and Paul DiMaggio (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, pp. 63–82. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
7. Gioia, Dennis A., James B. Thomas, Shawn M. Clark and Kumar Chittipeddi (1994) ‘Symbolism and Strategic Change in Academia: The Dynamics of Sensemaking and Influence’, Organization Science5(3): 363–383.
8. Hansen, Hanne Foss (1999) ‘Methodological Problems/Warnings’, in Karen Siune (ed.) Assessing Assessments. European Experiences. Aarhus: The Danish Institute for Studies in Research Policy.
9. Hansen, Hanne Foss and Finn Borum (1999) ‘The Construction and Standardization of Evaluation: The Case of the Danish University Sector’, Evaluation5(3): 303–329.
10. March, James G. (1995) Fornuft og Forandring. Ledelse i en verden beriget med uklarhed. København: Samfundslitteratur.
11. Meyer, John W. and B. Rowan (1977) ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology83: 340–363.
12. Nelson, R. P. and S. G. Winter (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Orton, J. D. and K. E. Weick (1990) ‘Loosely Coupled Systems. A Reconceptualization’, Academy of Management Review15(2): 203–223.
14. Pfeffer, Jeffrey and Gerald R. Salancik (1978) The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependency Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
15. Rossi, Peter H., Howard E. Freeman and Mark W. Lipsey (1999) Evaluation. A Systematic Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
16. Røvik, K. A. (1998) Moderne organisasjoner. Trender i organisasjonstenkningen ved tusindÂrsskiftet. Bergen-Sandviken: Fagbokforlaget.
17. Seglen, Per O. (1992) ‘The Skewness of Science’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science43(9): 628–638.
18. Seglen, Per O. (1994) ‘Causal Relationship between Article Citedness and Journal Impact’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science45(1): 1–11.
19. Thompson, J. D. and A. Tuden (1959) ‘Strategies, Structures, and Processes of Organizational Decisions’, in J. D. Thompson et al. (eds) Comparative Studies in Administration, pp. 195–216. Pittsburg, PA:University of Pittsburg Press.
20. Vedung, Evert (1997) Public Policy and Program Evaluation.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
21. Weick, K. E. (1976) ‘Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems’, Administrative Science Quarterly21: 1–19.
22. Weick, K. E. (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd edn.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
23. Weick, K. E. (1993) ‘Organizational Redesign as Improvisation’, in G. P. Huber and W. H. Glick (eds) Organizational Change and Redesign.New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. WennerÂs, Christine and Agnes Wold (1997) ‘Nepotism and Sexism in Peer Review’, Nature387 (May).