Understanding Dialogue as Practice

Evaluation

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 228-237

  Schwandt, Thomas A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

(moral) judgement; Bildung; critical dialogue; practice; Socratic dialogue

Indexed keywords

EID: 27744490106     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: 14617153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/13563890122209658     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Bauman, Z. (1992) Intimations of Postmodernity. London: Routledge.
2. Burbules, N. C. and S. Rice (1991) ‘Dialogue across Differences: Continuing the Conversation’, Harvard Educational Review61(4): 393–416.
3. Gadamer, H.-G. (1981) Reason in the Age of Science, trans. F. G. Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Gadamer, H.-G. (1989) Truth and Method, 2nd revised edn, trans. by J. Weinsheimer and D. G. Marshall. New York: Crossroad.
5. Gallagher, S. (1992) Hermeneutics and Education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
6. Garrison, J. (1996) ‘A Deweyan Theory of Democratic Listening’, Educational Theory46(4): 429–451.
7. Kerdeman, D. (1998) ‘Hermeneutics and Education: Understanding, Control and Agency’, Educational Theory48(2): 241–266.
8. Kögler, H. H. (1999) The Power of Dialogue: Critical Hermeneutics after Gadamer and Foucault, trans. P. Hendrickson. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. MacDonald, B. (1977) ‘A Political Classification of Evaluation Studies’, in D. Hamilton, D. Jenkins, C. King, B. MacDonald and M. Partlett (eds) Beyond the Numbers Game. London: Macmillan.
10. Risser, J. (1997) Hermeneutics and the Voice of the Other: Re-reading Gadamer's Philosophical Hermeneutics. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.