Monoscopic versus stereoscopic retinal photography for grading diabetic retinopathy severity

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 3184-3192

  Li, Helen K ^a,b   Hubbard, Larry D ^c   Danis, Ronald P ^c   Esquivel, Adol ^d   Florez Arango, Jose F ^b,e   Krupinski, Elizabeth A ^f  

^a University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine   (United States)

^b University of Texas School of Health Information Sciences at Houston   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSIDAD DE ANTIOQUIA   (Colombia)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; EYE PHOTOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FILM PHOTOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MONOSCOSPIC DIGITAL RETINAL PHOTOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETINA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STEREO DIGITAL RETINAL PHOTOGRAPHY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HOSPITALIZATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PHOTOGRAPHY; RETINA BLOOD VESSEL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINAL VESSELS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 77953242072     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4886     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Davis MD, Norton WD, Myers FL. Airlie classification of diabetic retinopathy: In: Goldberg MF, Fine SL, eds. Symposium on the treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Publication no. 1890. Arlington, VA: US Department of Health, Education and Welfare; 1968: 7-22.
2. Allen L. Ocular fundus photography: suggestions for achieving consistently good pictures and instructions for stereoscopic photography. Am J Ophthalmol. 1964;57:13-28.
3. Diabetic Retinopathy Research Study Group. A modification of the Airlie House classification of diabetic retinopathy. DRS report number 6. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981;21:210-216.
4. Diabetic Retinopathy Study: Manual of Operations. Baltimore: Diabetic Retinopathy Study Coordinating Center; 1972.
5. Diabetic Retinopathy Research Study Group: Design, methods, and baseline results. DRS report number 6. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981;21:149-209.
6. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs: an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report 10. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:786-806.
7. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. DRCRnet Manual of Operations. Ver 3.0. Tampa, FL: Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation; April 8, 2005.
8. Chew EY, Ambrosius WT, Howard LT, et al. Rationale, design, and methods of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Eye Study (ACCORD-EYE). Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:103i-111i.
9. Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC). Design, implementation, and preliminary results of a long-term follow-up of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial cohort. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:99-111.
10. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). Design and methodologic considerations for the feasibility phase. The DCCT Research Group. Diabetes. 1986;35:530-545.
11. Modified 7-standard field color fundus photography (7M-F) and film fluorescein angiography (FA-F). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison Fundus Photograph Reading Center; 2009. Available at: http://eyephoto.ophth.wisc.edu/Photography/Proto-cols/Mod7&FA-ver1.pdf. Accessed: June 21, 2009.
12. Davis MD, Hubbard LD, Trautman J, Klein R. Conference on insulin pump therapy in diabetes: multicenter study effect on microvascular disease-studies of retinopathy-methodology for assessment and classification with fundus photographs. Diabetes. 1985;34(suppl 3):42-49.
13. Rudnisky CJ, Tennant MT, de Leon AR, et al. Benefits of stereopsis when identifying clinically significant macular edema via teleoph-thalmology. Can J Ophthalmol. 2006;41:727-732.
14. Younis N, Broadbent DM, Vora JP, Harding SP. Incidence of sight-threatening retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes in the Liverpool Diabetic Eye Study: a cohort study. Lancet. 2003;361: 195-200.
15. Kohner EM, Aldington SJ, Stratton IM, et al. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study, 30: diabetic retinopathy at diagnosis of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and associated risk factors. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:297-303.
16. Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Neider MW, et al. Brightness, contrast, and color balance of digital versus film retinal images in the age-related eye disease study 2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:3269-3282.
17. Yassur Y, Siegel R, Karp M, Laron Z, Topper E. The detection of early microangiopathy in juvenile diabetics by monochromatic light photography. Pediatr Adolesc Endocrinol. 1980;9:181-184.
18. Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 12. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:823-833.
19. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
20. Uebersax JS. User guide for the MH program (vers. 1.2). Statistical Methods for Rater Agreement; 2006. Available at: http://ourworld. compuserve.com/homepages/jsuebersax/mh.htm. Accessed: May 1, 2009.
21. Tyleer ME. Stereo fundus photography: principles and techniques. In: Saine PJ, Tyler ME. eds. Ophthalmic Photography: Retinal Photography, Angiography, and Electronic Imaging. 2nd ed. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2002:118-135.
22. Moller F, Hansen M, Sjolie AK. Is one 60 degree fundus photograph sufficient for screening of proliferative diabetic retinopathy? Diabetes Care. 2001;24:2083-2085.
23. Atan D, Foy C, Scanlon PH. Reply to: Evaluation of the effect of JPEG and JPEG2000 image compression on the detection of diabetic retinopathy (author reply 3 to a letter). Eye. 2008;22:471;.
24. Scanlon PH, Malhotra R, Greenwood RH, et al. Comparison of two reference standards in validating two field mydriatic digital photography as a method of screening for diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:1258-1263.
25. Lawrence MG. The accuracy of digital-video retinal imaging to screen for diabetic retinopathy: an analysis of two digital-video retinal imaging systems using standard stereoscopic seven-field photography and dilated clinical examination as reference standards. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2004;102:321-340.
26. Massin P, Erginay A, Ben Mehidi A, et al. Evaluation of a new non-mydriatic digital camera for detection of diabetic retinopathy. Diabet Med. 2003;20:635-641.
27. Aldington SJ, Kohner EM, Meuer S, et al. Methodology for retinal photography and assessment of diabetic retinopathy: the EURO-DIAB IDDM complications study. Diabetologia. 1995;38:437-444.
28. Shah KB, Han DP. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Int Ophthal-mol Clin. 2004;44:69-84.
29. Taylor E, Dobree JH. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy: site and size of initial lesions. Br J Ophthalmol. 1970;54:11-18.
30. Feman SS, Leonard-Martin TC, Semchyshyn TM. The topographic distribution of the first sites of diabetic retinal neovascularization. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:704-706.
31. Rudnisky CJ, Tennant MT, Weis E, et al. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1748-1754