Is one 60° fundus photograph sufficient for screening of proliterative diabetic retinopathy?

Diabetes Care

Volumn 24, Issue 12, 2001, Pages 2083-2085

  Moller, Flemming ^a   Hansen, Merete ^a   Sjølie, Anne Katrin ^a  

^a ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; EYE FUNDUS; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NEOVASCULARIZATION (PATHOLOGY); NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PHOTOGRAPHY; RETINA BLOOD VESSEL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; DIABETES MELLITUS, INSULIN-DEPENDENT; DIABETES MELLITUS, NON-INSULIN-DEPENDENT; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; FEMALE; FLUORESCEIN ANGIOGRAPHY; FUNDUS OCULI; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGE; NEOVASCULARIZATION, PATHOLOGIC; PHOTOGRAPHY; RETINAL VESSELS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0035651026     PISSN: 01495992     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.24.12.2083     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Amos AF, McCarty DJ, Zimmet P: The rising global burden of diabetes and its complications: estimates and projections to year 2010. Diabetes Med H (Suppl. 5):1-85, 1997
2. Green A, Andersen PK, Svendsen AJ, Mortensen K: Increasing incidence of early onset type 1 (insulin dependent) diabetes mellitus: a study of Danish male birth cohorts. Diabetologia 35:178-182, 1992
3. Green A, Sjolie AK, Eshoj O: Trends in the epidemiology of IDDM during 1970-2020 in Fyn County, Denmark. Diabetes Care 19:801-806, 1996
4. Klein R: Recent developments in the understanding of diabetic retinopathy. Med Clin North Am 72:1415-1433, 1988
5. Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study Group: Early photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy, ETTRS report number 9. Ophthalmology 98:766-785, 1991
6. Hutchinson A, McIntosh A, Peters J, O'Keefe C, Khunti K, Baker R, Booth A: Effectiveness of screening and monitoring test for diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review. Diabet Med 17:495-506, 2000
7. Moss SE, Klein R, Kessler SD, Richie KA: Comparison between ophthalmoscopy and fundus photography in determining severity of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 92:62-67, 1985
8. Kinyoun JL, Martin DC, Fujimolo WY, Leonetti DL: Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photographs for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33:1888-1893, 1992
9. Harding SP, Broadbent DM, Neoh C, White MC, Vora J: Sensitivity and specificity of photography and direct ophthalmoscopy in screening for sight threatening eye disease: the Liverpool Diabetic Eye Study. BMJ 28:1131-1135, 1992
10. Aldington SJ, Kohner EM, Meuer S, Klein R, Sjolie AK: Methodology for retinal photography and assessment of diabetic retinopathy: the EURODIAB IDDM complications study. Diabetologa 38:437-444, 1995
11. Pugh JA, Jacobson JM, Van Heuven WAJ, Watters JA, Tuley MR, Lairson DR, Lorimor RJ, Kapadia AS, Velez R: Screening for diabetic retinopathy: the wide-angle retinal camera. Diabetes Care 16:889-895, 1993
12. Newsom R, Moate B, Casswell T: Screening for diabetic retinopathy using digital colour photography and oral fluorescein angiography. Eye 14:579-582, 2000
13. Klein R, Klein BE, Neider MW, Hubbard LD, Meuer SM, Brothers RJ: Diabetic retinopathy as detected using ophthalmoscopy, a nonmydriatic camera and a standard fundus camera. Ophthalmology 92:485-491, 1985
14. Moss SE, Meuer SM, Klein R, Hubbard LD, Brothers RJ, Klein BE: Are seven standard photographic fields necessary for classification of diabetic retinopathy? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30:823-828, 1989