Representation recovers information

Cognitive Science

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1383-1412

  Thornton, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Close coupling; Cognitive informatics; Information; Representation; Sensory embedding

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953158276     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01066.x     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Ballard, D. (1991). Animate vision. Artificial Intelligence, 48, 57-86.
2. Barlow, H. (1961). Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. In W.A. Rosenblith (Ed.), Sensory communication (pp. 217-234). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Barsalou, L. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
4. Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Beer, R. (1990). Intelligence as adaptive behaviour: An experiment in computational neuroethology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6. Beer, R. (2003). The dynamics of active categorical perception in an evolved model agent. Adaptive Behavior, 11(4), 209-243.
7. Bickhard, M., & Terveen, L. (1995). Foundational issues in artificial intelligence and cognitive science: Impasse and solution. New York: Elsevier Science.
8. Brachman, R., & Levesque, H. (Eds.) (1985). Readings in knowledge representation. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
9. Braitenberg, V. (1984). Vehicles: Experiments in synthetic psychology. London: The MIT Press.
10. Brignell, J., & White, N. (1994). Intelligent sensor systems. Bristol, England: IOP Publishing Ltd.
11. Brooks, R. (1986). A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, RA-2(1), 14-23.
12. Brooks, R. (1991a). Intelligence without reason. In J. Mylopoulos & R. Reiter (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 569-595). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
13. Brooks, R. (1991b). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139-159.
14. Clancey, W. (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
15. Clark, A. (1996). Happy couplings: Emergence and explanatory interlock. In M.A. Boden (Ed.), The philosophy of artificial life (pp. 262-281). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
16. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Clark, A. (2003). Natural born cyborgs: Minds, technologies and the future of human intelligence. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
18. Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action and cognitive extension. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
19. Clark, A., & Grush, R. (1999). Towards a cognitive robotics. Adaptive Behavior, 7(1), 5-16.
20. Clark, A., & Thornton, C. (1997). Trading spaces: Computation, representation and the limits of uninformed learning. Behaviour and Brain Sciences, 20, 57-90.
21. Clark, A., & Toribio, J. (1994). Doing without representing. Synthese, 101, 401-431.
22. Cover, T., & Thomas, J. (1991). Elements of information theory. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
23. Dean, P., Mayhew, J., & Langdon, P. (1994). Learning and maintaining saccadic accuracy: A model of brainstem-cerebellum interactions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 117-138.
24. Dreyfus, H. (1979). What computers can't do (rev. ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
25. Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. New York: Crowell.
26. Gallese, V., & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(12), 493-501.
27. Gärdenfors, P. (2000). Conceptual spaces: The geometry of thought. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
28. van Gelder, T. (1995). What might cognition be, if not computation. Journal of Philosophy, XCII(7), 345-381.
29. Gibson, J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. London: Houghton Mifflin.
30. Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
31. Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 377-442.
32. Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42, 335-346.
33. Haselager, P., de Groot, A., & van Rappard, H. (2003). Representationalism vs. anti-representationalism: A debate for the sake of appearance. Philosophical Psychology, 16, 5-23.
34. van Hateren, J. (1992). A theory of maximizing sensory information. Biological Cybernetics, 68(1), 23-29.
35. Haugeland, J. (1991). Representational genera. In W. Ramsay, S.P. Stick, & D.E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Philosophy and connectionist theory (pp. 61-89). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Hesslow, G. (2002). Conscious thought as simulation of behaviour and perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 242-247.
37. Hillis, J., Ernst, M., Banks, M., & Landy, M. (2002). Combining sensory information: Mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses. Science, 298, 1627-1630.
38. Kawato, M., Furukawa, K., & Suzuki, R. (1987). A hierarchical neural network model for the control and learning of voluntary movement. Biological Cybernetics, 57, 169-185.
39. Kirsh, D. (1996). Today the earwig, tomorrow man? In M.A. Boden (Ed.), The philosophy of artificial life (pp. 237-261). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
40. Korb, K., & Nicholson, A. (2003). Bayesian artificial intelligence. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
41. Kullback, S. (1987). The Kullback-Leibler distance. The American Statistician, 41, 340-341.
42. Laming, D. (1986). Sensory analysis. London: Academic Press.
43. Lungarella, M., & Pfeifer, R. (2001). Robots as cognitive tools: Information theoretic analysis of sensory-motor data. In Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (pp. 245-252). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
44. Lungarella, M., & Sporns, O. (2005). Information self-structuring: Key principles for learning and development. In Proceedings 2005 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (pp. 25-30).
45. Lungarella, M., Pegors, T., Bulwinkle, D., & Sporns, O. (2005). Methods for quantifying the information structure of sensory and motor data. Neuro-informatics, 3(3), 243-2620.
46. Maes, P., & Brooks, R. (1990). Learning to coordinate behaviors. In Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 796-802). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
47. Maravita, A., and Iriki, A. (2004). Tools for the body (schema). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(2), 79-86.
48. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. New York: W.H. Freeman.
49. Mather, P. (1999). Computer processing of remotely-sensed images. Chichester, England: Wiley.
50. Newell, A., & Simon, H. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
51. Newell, A., & Simon, H. (1976). Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search. Communications of the ACM, 19(3), 113-126.
52. Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. London: The MIT Press.
53. Pearl, J. (1985). Bayesian networks: A model of self-activated memory for evidential reasoning. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 329-334). Irvine, CA: University of California.
54. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
55. Pfeifer, R., & Scheier, C. (1997). Sensory-motor coordination: The metaphor and beyond. Practice and future of autonomous agents. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 20, 157-178.
56. Pfeifer, R., & Scheier, C. (1999). Understanding intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Prinz, J. (2002). Furnishing the mind: Concepts and their perceptual basis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58. Pylyshyn, Z. (1987). The robots dilemma: The frame problem in artificial intelligence. Norwood: Ablex.
59. Rizzolati, G., Forgassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 2, 661-670.
60. Sabins, F. (1978). Remote sensing: Principles and interpretation. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
61. Searle, J. (1980). Minds, brains and programs [with peer commentaries]. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417-457.
62. Sedgewick, R. (1988). Algorithmics (2nd ed.). Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
63. Shannon, C. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423 and 623-656.
64. Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
65. Smith, B. (1996). On the origin of objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66. Smith, C. (2000). Biology of sensory systems. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
67. Stewart, J. (1995). Cognition = life: Implications for higher-level cognition. Behavioural Processes, 35, 311-326.
68. Svensson, H., & Ziemke, T. (2005). Embodied representation: What are the issues? In B.G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarell Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2116-2121). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
69. Tononi, G., Sporns, O., & Edelman, G. (1994). A measure for brain complexity: Relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 91, 5033-5037.
70. Tononi, G., Sporns, O., & Edelman, G. (1996). A complexity measure for selective matching of signals by the brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 3422-3427.
71. Usher, M., & Keating, D. (1996). Sensors and transducers: Characteristics, applications, instrumentation, interfacing. London: Macmillan.
72. Varella, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
73. Webster, J. (1999). The measurement, instrumentation and sensors, handbook. Danvers, MA: CRC Press LLC.
74. Wheeler, M. (1996). From robots to Rothko: The bringing forth of worlds. In M.A. Boden (Ed.), The philosophy of artificial life (pp. 209-236). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
75. Wheeler, M., & Clark, A. (1999). Genic representation: reconciling content and causal complexity. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50, 103-135.
76. Wilson, J. (2005). Sensor technology handbook. Oxford, England: Elsevier Inc.
77. Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.