Representationalism vs. anti-representationalism: A debate for the sake of appearance

Philosophical Psychology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 5-24

  Haselager, Pim ^a   De Groot, André ^b   Van Rappard, Hans ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037362163     PISSN: 09515089     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0951508032000067761     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. BECHTEL, W. (1998). Representations and cognitive explanations: assessing the dynamicist's challenge in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 22, 295-318.
2. BECHTEL, W. (2001). Representations: from neural systems to cognitive systems. In W. BECHTEL, P. MANDIK, J. MUNDALE & R.S. STUFFLEBEAM (Eds) Philosophy and the neurosciences: a reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
3. BECHTEL, W. & RICHARDSON, R.C. (1993). Discovering complexity: decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. BEER, R. (1995a). Computational and dynamical languages for autonomous agents. In R.F. PORT & T. VAN GELDER (Eds) Mind as motion: explorations in the dynamics of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. BEER, R. (1995b). A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction. Artificial Intelligence, 72, 173-215.
6. BEER, R. (2000). Dynamical approaches to cognitive science. Trends in cognitive science, 4, 91-99.
7. BICKHARD, M.H. & TERVEEN, L. (1995). Foundational issues in artificial intelligence and cognitive science: impasse and solutions. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
8. BLOCK, N. (1995). The mind as the software of the brain. In E.E. SMITH & D.N. OSHERSON (Eds) Thinking: an invitation to cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. BROOKS, R. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139-159.
10. BROOKS, R. (1995). Intelligence without reason. In L. STEELS & R. BROOKS (Eds) The artificial life route to artificial intelligence: building embodied, situated agents. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. CHALMERS, D.J. (1994). A computational foundation for the study of cognition: Philosophy-Neuroscience-Psychology Technical Report 94-03. St. Louis, MO: Washington University.
12. CHALMERS, D.J. (1995). On implementing a computation. Minds and Machines, 4, 391-402.
13. CHALMERS, D.J. (1996). Does a rock implement every finite-state automaton? Synthese, 108, 309-333.
14. CHRISLEY, R.L. (1995). Why everything doesn't realize every computation. Minds and Machines, 4, 403-420.
15. CHURCHLAND, P.S. & SEJNOWSKI, T.J. (1992). The computational brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. CLANCEY, W.J. (1997). Situated cognition: on human knowledge and computer representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. CLARK, A. (1997a). Being there: putting brain, body, and world together. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. CLARK, A. (1997b). The dynamical challenge. Cognitive Science, 21, 461-481.
19. CLARK, A. & GRUSH, R. (1999). Towards a cognitive robotics. Adaptive Behavior, 7, 5-16.
20. CLARK, A. & TORIBIO, J. (1994). Doing without representing? Synthese, 101, 401-431.
21. CLIFF, D. & NOBLE, J. (1997). Knowledge-based vision and simple visual machines. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 352, 1165-1175.
22. DENNETT, D. (1991). Real patterns. Journal of Philosophy, 88, 27-51.
23. ELIASMITH, C. (1996). The third contender: a critical examination of the dynamicist theory of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 9, 441-463.
24. ELIASMITH, C. (1997). Computation and dynamical models of mind. Minds and Machines, 7, 531-541.
25. FODOR, J.A. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. GRUSH, R. (1997). The architecture of representation. Philosophical Psychology, 10, 5-23.
27. HARVEY, I. (1996). Untimed and misrepresented: connectionism and the computer metaphor. AISB Quarterly, 96, 20-27.
28. HAUGELAND, J. (1991). Representational genera. In W.M. RAMSEY, S.P. STICH & D.E. RUMELHART (Eds) Philosophy and connectionist theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. HENDRIK-JANSEN, H. (1996). Catching ourselves in the act: situated activity, interactive emergence, evolution, and human thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. KEIJZER, F. (2001). Representation and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. KELSO, J.A.S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: the self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. KIM, J. (1996). Philosophy of mind. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
33. MARR, D. (1981). Vision. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.
34. NEWELL, A. (1980). Physical symbol system. Cognitive Science, 4, 135-183.
35. PALMER, S.E. & KIMCHI, R. (1986). The information processing approach to cognition. In T.J. KNAPP & L.C. ROBERTSON (Eds) Approaches to cognition: contrasts and controversies. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. PORT, R.F. & VAN GELDER, T. (1995). Mind as motion: explorations in the dynamics of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. PUTNAM, H. (1988). Representation and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. PYLYSHYN, Z.W. (1980). Cognition and computation: issues in the foundations of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 111-132.
39. PYLYSHYN, Z.W. (1984). Computation and cognition: toward a foundation for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. SEARLE, J. (1992). The rediscovery of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. THELEN, E. & SMITH, L.B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. VAN GELDER, T. (1995). What might cognition be, if not computation? Journal of Philosophy, 92, 345-381.
43. VAN GELDER, T. (1998). The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 615-665.
44. VAN GELDER, T. & PORT, R.F. (1995). It's about time: an overview of the dynamical approach to cognition. In R.F. PORT & T. VAN GELDER (Eds) Mind as motion: explorations in the dynamics of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. VAN ROOIJ, I., BONGERS, R. & HASELAGER, W.F.G. (2002). A non-representational approach to imagined action. Cognitive Science, 26, 345-375.
46. VARELA, F.J., THOMPSON, E. & ROSCH, E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. WHEELER, M. & CLARK, A. (1999). Genie representation: reconciling content and causal complexity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50, 103-135.