Can ecological stoichiometry help explain patterns of biological invasions?

Oikos

Volumn 119, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 779-790

  González, Angélica L ^a   Kominoski, John S ^b   Danger, Michael ^c,d   Ishida, Seiji ^e   Iwai, Noriko ^f   Rubach, Anja ^g  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c Université de Toulouse   (France)

^d Faculté des Sciences et Technologies   (France)

^e TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^f FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^g UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM; BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; ECOSYSTEM STRUCTURE; ENERGY BALANCE; GROWTH RATE; INVASIVE SPECIES; MASS BALANCE; META-ANALYSIS; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY; STOICHIOMETRY; TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEM;

INVERTEBRATA;

EID: 77953095694     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.18549.x     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Acharya K. Stoichiometry of Daphnia lumholtzi and their invasion success: are they linked? Arch. Hydrobiol. 2006, 165:433-453.
2. Agrawal A A. Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions and evolution of species. Science 2001, 321:321-326.
3. Ågren G. Stoichiometry and nutrition of plant growth in natural communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2008, 39:153-170.
4. Aikio S, Markkola A M. Optimality and phenotypic plasticity of shoot-to-root ratio under variable light and nutrient availabilities. Evol. Ecol. 2002, 16:67-76.
5. Anderson T R, Hessen D O. Threshold elemental ratios for carbon versus phosphorus limitation in Daphnia. Freshwater Biol. 2005, 50:2063-2075.
6. Anderson T R. Stoichiometry: linking elements to biochemicals. Ecology 2004, 85:1193-1202.
7. Blair A C, Wolfe L M. The evolution of an invasive plant: an experimental study with Silene latifolia. Ecology 2004, 85:3035-3042.
8. Blossey B, Notzold R. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants - a hypothesis. J. Ecol. 1995, 83:887-889.
9. Blumenthal D. Interrelated causes of plant invasion. Science 2005, 310:243-244.
10. Blumenthal D. Interactions between resource availability and enemy release in plant invasion. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9:887-895.
11. Blumenthal D. Synergy between pathogen release and resource availability in plant invasion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:7899-7904.
12. Brown J H. Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 2004, 85:1771-1789.
13. Burns J H. Relatedness and environment affect traits associated with invasive and noninvasive introduced Commelinaceae. Ecol. Appl. 2006, 16:1367-1376.
14. Catford J A. Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Div. Distr. 2009, 15:22-40.
15. Chun Y J. Phenotypic plasticity of native vs invasive purple loosestrife: a two-state multivariate approach. Ecology 2007, 88:1499-1512.
16. Claridge K, Franklin S B. Compensation and plasticity in an invasive plant species. Biol. Invas. 2002, 4:339-347.
17. Coley P D. Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 1985, 230:895-899.
18. Daehler C C. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2003, 34:183-211.
19. Davis M A. Biotic globalization: does competition from introduced species threaten biodiversity? Bioscience 2003, 53:481-489.
20. Davis M A, Pelsor M. Experimental support for a resource-based mechanistic model of invasibility. Ecol. Lett. 2001, 4:421-428.
21. Davis M A. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J. Ecol. 2000, 88:528-534.
22. Drenovsky R E. Variation in resource acquisition and utilization traits between native and invasive perennial forbs. Am. J. Bot. 2008, 95:681-687.
23. Dzialowski A R. Range expansion and potential dispersal mechanisms of the exotic cladocerans Daphnia lumholtzi. J. Plankton Res. 2000, 22:2005-2223.
24. Dzialowski A R. Predator-induced phenotypic plasticity in the exotic cladoceran Daphnia lumholtzi. Freshwater Biol. 2003, 48:1593-1602.
25. Elser J J. Biological stoichiometry: a chemical bridge between ecosystem ecology and evolutionary biology. Am. Nat. 2006, 168:25-35.
26. Elser J J, Urabe J. The stoichiometry of consumer-driven nutrient recycling: theory, observations and consequences. Ecology 1999, 80:735-751.
27. Elser J J. Organism size, life history, and N:P stoichiometry: towards unified view of cellular and ecosystem processes. Bioscience 1996, 46:674-684.
28. Elser J J. Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2000a, 3:540-550.
29. Elser J J. The evolution of ecosystem processes: growth rate and elemental stoichiometry of a key herbivore in temperate and arctic habitats. J. Evol. Biol. 2000b, 13:845-853.
30. Elser J J. Growth rate-stoichiometry couplings in diverse biota. Ecol. Lett. 2003, 6:936-943.
31. Elser J J. Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:1135-1142.
32. Engel K, Tollrian R. Inducible defences as key adaptations for the successful invasion of Daphnia lumholtzi in North America? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2009, 276:1865-1873.
33. Finzi A C, Rodgers V L. Bottom-up rather than top-down processes regulate the abundance and activity of nitrogen fixing plants in two Connecticut old-field ecosystems. Biogeochemistry 2009, 95:309-321.
34. Frost P C. Are you what you eat? Physiological constraints on organismal stoichiometry in an elementally imbalanced world. Oikos 2005, 109:18-28.
35. Frost P C. Threshold elemental ratios of carbon and phosphorus in aquatic consumers. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9:774-779.
36. Frost P C. Responses of a bacterial pathogen to phosphorus limitation of its aquatic invertebrate host. Ecology 2008, 89:313-318.
37. Funk J L. Differences in plasticity between invasive and native plants from a low resource environment. J. Ecol. 2008, 96:1162-1173.
38. Funk J L, Vitousek P M. Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems. Nature 2007, 446:1079-1081.
39. Gorokhova E. Functional and ecological significance of rDNA intergenic spacer variation in a clonal organism under divergent selection for production rate. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2002, 269:2373-2379.
40. Gurevitch J, Hedges L V. Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses. Ecology 1999, 80:1142-1149.
41. Gurevitch J. A metaanalysis of competition in field experiments. Am. Nat. 1992, 140:539-572.
42. Güsewell S. N:P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance. New Phytol. 2004, 164:243-266.
43. Hastwell G T, Panetta F D. Can differential responses to nutrients explain the success of environmental weeds? J. Veg. Sci. 2005, 16:77-84.
44. Hastwell G T. Predicting invasiveness in exotic species: do subtropical native and invasive exotic aquatic plants differ in their growth responses to macronutrients? Div. Distr. 2008, 14:243-251.
45. Hooper D U. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monogr. 2005, 75:3-35.
46. Huenneke L F. Effects of soil resources on plant invasion and community structure in Californian serpentine grassland. Ecology 1990, 71:478-491.
47. James J J, Drenovsky R E. A basis for relative growth rate differences between native and invasive forb seedlings. Rangeland Ecol. Manage. 2007, 60:395-400.
48. Jeyasingh P D, Weider L J. Phosphorus availability mediates plasticity in life-history traits and predator-prey interactions in Daphnia. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:1021-1028.
49. Jeyasingh P D, Weider L J. Fundamental links between genes and elements: evolutionary implications of ecological stoichiometry. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:4649-4661.
50. Jeyasingh P D. Genetically-based tradeoffs in response to stoichiometric food quality influence competition in a key-stone aquatic herbivore. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:1229-1237.
51. Karasov W H, Martínez del Río C. Physiological ecology 2007, Princeton Univ. Press
52. Kay A D. Toward a stoichiometric framework for evolutionary biology. Oikos 2005, 109:6-17.
53. Keane R M, Crawley M J. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17:164-170.
54. LeBauer D S, Treseder K K. Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed. Ecology 2008, 89:371-379.
55. Lennon J T. Invasibility of plankton food webs along a trophic state gradient. Oikos 2003, 103:191-203.
56. Maron J L, Connors P G. A native nitrogen-fixing shrub facilitates weed invasion. Oecologia 1996, 105:302-312.
57. Martin P H. Why forests appear resistant to exotic plant invasions: intentional introductions, stand dynamics, and the role of shade tolerance. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7:142-149.
58. Matzek V, Vitousek P M. N:P stoichiometry and protein:RNA ratios in vascular plants: an evaluation of the growth-rate hypothesis. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:765-771.
59. Milchunas D G, Lauenroth W K. Inertia in plant community structure: state changes after cessation of nutrient-enrichment stress. Ecol. Appl. 1995, 5:452-458.
60. Mitchell C E, Power A G. Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 2003, 421:625-627.
61. Moe J. Recent advances in ecological stoichiometry: insights for population and community ecology. Oikos 2005, 109:29-39.
62. Mulder K, Bowden W B. Organismal stoichiometry and the adaptive advantage of variable nutrient use and production efficiency in Daphnia. Ecol. Modell. 2007, 202:427-440.
63. Naddafi P. Stoichiometric constraints do not limit successful invaders: zebra mussels in Swedish lakes. PLoS One 2009, 4:e5345.
64. Newingham B A, Belnap J. Direct effects of soil amendments on field emergence and growth of the invasive annual grass Bromus tectorum l. and the native perennial grass Hilaria jamesii (Torr.) Benth. Plant Soil 2006, 280:29-40.
65. Parker J D, Hay M E. Biotic resistance to plant invasions? Native herbivores prefer non-native plants. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:959-967.
66. Prentis P J. Adaptive evolution in invasive species. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13:288-294.
67. Reich P B, Oleksyn J. Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101:11001-11006.
68. Rejmánek M, Richardson M D. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 1996, 77:1655-1661.
69. Reznick D N, Ghalambor C K. The population ecology of contemporary adaptations: what empirical studies reveal about the conditions that promote adaptive evolution. Genetica 2001, 112:183-198.
70. Richards C L. Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9:981-993.
71. Richardson D M, Pyšek P. Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. Progr. Phys. Geogr. 2006, 30:409-431.
72. Richardson D M. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Div. Distr. 2000, 6:93-107.
73. Rosemond A D. A test of top-down and bottom-up control in a detritus-based food web. Ecology 2001, 82:2279-2293.
74. Rosemond A D. Landscape variation in phosphorus concentration and effects on detritus-based tropical streams. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2002, 47:278-289.
75. Rosenberg M S. The file-drawer problem revisited: a general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis. Evolution 2005, 59:464-468.
76. Rosenberg M S. MetaWin statistical software for meta-analysis, ver. 2 2000, Sinauer
77. Sala O E. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 2000, 287:1770-1774.
78. Schierenbeck K A. Effects of herbivory on growth and biomass allocation in native and introduced species of Lonicera. Ecology 1994, 75:1661-1672.
79. Schindler D W. Evolution of phosphorus limitation in lakes. Science 1977, 195:260-262.
80. Schumacher E. Influence of light and nutrient conditions on seedling growth of native and invasive trees in the Seychelles. Biol. Invas. 2009, 11:1941-1954.
81. Seastedt T. Traits of plant invaders. Nature 2009, 459:783-784.
82. Shea K, Chesson P. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17:170-176.
83. Shurin J B. All wet or dried up? Real differences between aquatic and terrestrial food webs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2006, 273:1-9.
84. Smith A S. Overcrowding, food and phosphorus limitation effects on ephipphia production and population dynamics in the invasive species Daphnia lumholtzi. Hydrobiologia 2009, 618:47-56.
85. Smith V H. Effects of nitrogen-phosphorus supply ratios on nitrogen-fixation in agricultural and pastoral ecosystems. Biogeochemistry 1992, 18:19-35.
86. Srivastava D S, Vellend M. Biodiversity-ecosystem function research: is it relevant to conservation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2005, 36:267-294.
87. Stachowicz J J, Tilman D. Species invasions and the relationships between species diversity, community saturation, and ecosystem functioning. Species invasions: insights into ecology, evolution, and biogeography 2005, 41-64. Sax D F, In:, (eds),, Sinauer, pp.
88. Sterner R W, Elser J J. Ecological stoichiometry 2002, Princeton Univ. Press
89. Suárez A V, Tsutsui T T. The evolutionary consequences of biological invasions. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:351-360.
90. Tilman D. Resource competition and community structure. Monographs in population biology 1982, Princeton Univ. Press
91. Torchin M E, Mitchell C E. Parasites, pathogens, and invasions by plants and animals. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2004, 2:183-190.
92. Urabe J, Watanabe Y. Possibility of N or P limitation for planktonic cladocerans: an experimental test. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1992, 37:244-251.
93. Ventura M. Effects of increased temperature and nutrient enrichment on the stoichiometry of primary producers and consumers in temperate shallow lakes. Freshwater Biol. 2008, 53:1434-1452.
94. Vermeij M J. Release from native herbivores facilitates the persistence of invasive marine algae: a biogeographical comparison of the relative contribution of nutrients and herbivory to invasion success. Biol. Invas. 2009, 11:1463-1474.
95. Vitousek P M. Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency. Am. Nat. 1982, 119:553-572.
96. Vitousek P M. Nutrient limitation to nitrogen fixation in young volcanic sites. Ecosystems 1999, 2:505-510.
97. Vitousek P M. Nutrient cycling and limitation: Hawai'i as a model system 2004, Princeton Univ. Press
98. Vitousek P M, Howarth R W. Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: how can it occur? Biogeochemistry 1991, 13:87-115.
99. Vitousek P M. Human domination of Earth's ecosystems. Science 1997, 277:494-499.
100. Wang H. Daphnia species invasion, competitive exclusion, and chaotic coexistence. DCDS-B 2009, 12:481-493.
101. Whitney K D, Gabler C A. Rapid evolution in introduced species, 'invasive traits' and recipient communities: challenges for redicting invasive potential. Div. Distr. 2008, 14:569-580.
102. Yoshida T. Ecological stoichiometry and the shape of resource-based tradeoffs. Oikos 2006, 112:406-411.
103. Young K, Mangold J. Medusahead (Taeniatherum caputmedusae) outperforms squirreltail (Elymus elymoides) through interference and growth rate. Invas. Plant Sci. Manage. 2008, 1:73-81.