Impact of breast ultrasound screening in gynecological practice;Bedeutung der Mammasonografie für die Brustkrebsfrüherkennung in der Gynäkologischen Praxis

Ultraschall in der Medizin

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 289-295

  Madjar, H ^a   Becker, S ^b   Doubek, K ^b   Horchler, T ^b   Mendoza, M ^b   Moisidis Tesch, C ^b   Nather B ^b   Niebling, K ^b   Prols U ^b   Schardt, A R ^b   Ulrich, S ^b   Zahn, U ^b  

^a DKD ^*  (Germany)

^b Niedergelassene Frauenärzte und Teilnehmer des Qualitätszirkels Mammadiagnostik An der DKD   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast; Mammography; Neoplasms; Screening; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER STAGING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GERMANY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; LUNG CARCINOMA; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 77953089853     PISSN: 01724614     EISSN: 14388782     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1110010     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Schulz K D., Albert S U. Stufe 3 Leitlinie Brustkrebs-Früherkennung in Deutschland. München Zuckschwerdt Verlag 2003
2. Albert S U. Stufe 3 Leitlinie Brustkrebsfrüherkennung in Deutschland. München Zuckschwerdt Verlag 2008 1. Aktualisierung
3. Nyström L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N et al. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 2002 359 909-919
4. Petronella G MP, Holland R, Hendriks J HCL et al. Age-Specific Effectiveness of the Nijmegen Population-Based Breast Cancer-Screening Program: Assessment of Early Indicators of Screening Effectiveness. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994 86 436-441
5. Boyd N F., Guo H, Martin L J. et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. Engl J Med 2007 356 227-236
6. Berg W A., Blume J D., Cormack J B. et al. Combined Screening with Ultrasound and Mammography vs. Mammography alone in Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer. JAMA 2008 299 2151-2163
7. Buchberger W, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Springer P et al. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. Am J Roentgenol 1999 173 921-927
8. Gordon P, Goldenberg S L. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound: a retrospective review. Cancer 1995 76 626-630
9. Gordon P. Ultrasound for breast cancer screening and staging. Radiol Clin North Am 2002 40 431-41
10. Kolb T M., Lichy J, Newhouse J H. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 1998 207 191-199
11. Kolb T M., Lichy J, Newhouse J H. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002 225 165-175
12. Madjar H, Makowiec U, Mundinger A et al. Einsatz der hochauflösenden Sonographie zur Brustkrebsvorsorge. Ultraschall in Med 1994 15 20-23
13. Hille H, Vetter M, Hackelöer B J. The suitability of high resolution ultrasound for the detection of DCIS. Ultraschall in Med 2007 28 307-312
14. Madjar H, Mundinger A, Degenhardt F et al. Qualitätskontrolle in der Mamma-Sonographie. Ultraschall in Med 2003 24 190-194
15. Madjar H, Ohlinger R, Mundinger A et al. BI-RADS-analogue DEGUM criteria for findings in breast ultrasound Consensus of the DEGUM committee on breast ultrasound. Ultraschall in Med 2006 27 374-379
16. Madjar H, Mendelson E. The Practice of Breast Ultrasound. Stuttgart, New York Thieme 2008
17. American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR-BI-RADS Ultrasound. ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Breast Imaging Atlas Reston VA American College of Radiology 2003
18. Stavros A T., Thickman D, Rapp C L. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995 196 123-134
19. Thomas A, Filimonow S, Slowinski T et al. Image quality and characterisation of sonographically detected breast lesions: comparison of tissue harmonic imaging alone and in combination with frequency compounding. Ultraschall in Med 2007 28 387-393
20. Weismann C, Hergan K. Current status of 3D/ 4D volume ultrasound of the breast. Ultraschall in Med 2007 28 273-282
21. Madjar H. Stellenwert der Mammasonographie. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2008 68 1023-1024
22. Gesundheit kostet extra. Was die Kasse nicht zahlt, bietet der Arzt als Extra an. Focus 19.5.2008 66-80
23. Merz E, Eichhorn K H., Madjar H et al. Indikationen und Perspektiven der frauenärztlichen Mammasonographie nach Einführung des Mammographie-Screenings in Deutschland. Ultraschall in Med 2009 30 3-5
24. Nolsoe C P., Lorentzen T, Skjoldbye B O. et al. The Basis of Interventional Ultrasound. Ultraschall in Med 2007 28 248-269
25. Köhler J, Krause B, Grunwald S et al. Ultrasound and Mammography Guided Wire Marking of Non-Palpable Breast Lesions: Analysis of 741 Cases. Ultraschall in Med 2007 28 283-290