Indication for and possibilities of gynecological breast sonography after the introduction of mammography screening in Germany;Indikation und perspektiven der frauenärztlichen mammasonografie nach einführung des mammografie-screenings in Deutschland

Ultraschall in der Medizin

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 3-5

  Merz, E ^a   Eichhorn, K H ^b   Madjar, H ^b   Hackeloer B J ^b   Degenhardt, F ^b  

^a Krankenhaus   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CARCINOMA; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISPLAY SYSTEM; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; EDITORIAL; GERMANY; GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; SCREENING TEST;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING;

EID: 63149169948     PISSN: 01724614     EISSN: 14388782     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1109120     Document Type: Editorial

References (16)

1. Weismann C, Hergan K. Aktueller Stand der 3D/4D-Volumensonographie der Mamma. Ultraschall in Med 2007; 28: 273-282
2. Madjar H, Ohlinger R, Mundinger A et al. BI-RADS analoge DEGUM Kriterien von Ultraschall-befunden der Brust - Konsensus des Arbeitskreises Mammasonographie der DEGUM. Ultraschall in Med 2006; 27: 374-379
3. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the Performance of Screening Mammography, physical examination and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002; 225: 165-175
4. Köhler J, Krause B, Grunwald S et al. Ultrasound and mammography guided wire marking of non-palpable breast lesions: analysis of 741 cases. Ultraschall in Med 2007; 28: 283-290
5. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008; 299: 2151-2163
6. Hille H, Vetter M, Hackelöer BJ. Die Eignung der hochfrequenten Sonographie zur Diagnostik des DCIS. Ultraschall in Med 2007; 28: 307-312
7. Riebe E, Günther K, Schulz K et al. Recurrent disease after breast preserving therapy (BPT) and radiation therapy for breast cancer - diagnostic yield of palpation, mammography and ultrasonography. Ultraschall in Med 2007; 28: 394-400
8. Grunwald S, Heyer H, Kühl et al. Radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion of the breast - value of ultrasound. Ultraschall in Med 2007; 28: 206-211
9. Hahn M, Kuner RP, Scheler P et al. Sonographic criteria for the confirmation of implant rotation and the development of an implant-capsule- interaction ("interface") in natomically formed textured breast implants with texturised Biocell-surface. Ultraschall in Med 2008; 29: 399-404
10. Del Carmen MG, Hughes KS, Halpern E et al. Racial differences in mammographic breast density. Cancer 2003; 98: 590-596
11. Leconte I, Feger C, Galant C et al. Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 1675-1679
12. Madjar H, Mundinger A, Degenhardt F et al. Qualitätskontrolle in der Mamma-Sonographie. Ultraschall in Med 2003; 24: 190-194
13. DEGUM 3-Stufenkonzept Mammawww.degum.de
14. Albert US. Stufe-3-Leitlinie. Brustkrebs-Früherkennung in Deutschland. München-Wien-New York: W. Zuckschwerdt Verlag, 2008; 1. Aktualisierung 2008
15. Versorgung im Rahmen des Programms zur Früherkennung von Brustkrebs durch Mammographie-Screening. Anlage 9.2 BMV-Ä/EKV. In der Fassung vom 27.8.2008, in Kraft getreten am 1.10.2008
16. Uchida K, Yamashita A, Kawase K et al. Screening ultrasonography revealed 15% ofmammographically occult breast cancers. Breast Cancer 2008; 15: 165-168