Preservice Teacher Understanding and Vision of how to Teach Biological Evolution

Evolution: Education and Outreach

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 490-504

  Nadelson, Louis S ^a  

^a BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological evolution; Misconception; Nature of Science; Preservice teacher; Situations of uncertainty

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953028416     PISSN: 19366426     EISSN: 19366434     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12052-008-0106-z     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abd-El-Khalick F, Akerson VL. Learning as conceptual change: factors mediating the development of preservice elementary teachers' views of nature of science. Sci Educ 2004;88(5):785-810. doi: 10.1002/sce.10143.
2. Alters BJ. Teaching biological evolution in higher education: methodological, religious, and nonreligious issues. Boston: Jones and Bartlett; 2004.
3. Alters BJ, Alters SM. Defending evolution: a guide to the creation/evolution controversy. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett; 2001.
4. Alters BJ, Nelson CE. Perspective: teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution Int J Org Evolution 2002;56:1891-901.
5. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.
6. Chinn M, Brewer W. An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. J Res Sci Teach 1998;35(6):623-54. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<623::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-O.
7. Cooper RA. Scientific knowledge of the past is possible: confronting myths about evolution & scientific methods. Am Biol Teach 2002;64(6):427-32. doi: 10.1662/0002-7685(2002)064[0427:SKOTPI]2.0.CO;2.
8. Crawford BA, Zembal-Saul C, Munford D, Friedrichsen P. Confronting prospective teachers' ideas of evolution and scientific inquiry using technology and inquiry-based tasks. J Res Sci Teach 2005;42(6):613-37. doi: 10.1002/tea.20070.
9. Cresswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 2003.
10. Dagher ZR, Boujaoude S. Students' perceptions of the nature of evolutionary theory. Sci Educ 2005;89(3):378-91. doi: 10.1002/sce.20054.
11. Darling-Hammond L, Bransford J, editors. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12. Dawkins R. The blind watchmaker: why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. New York: Norton; 1986.
13. Deemer S. Classroom goal orientation in thigh school classrooms: revealing links between teacher beliefs and classroom environments. Educ Res 2004;46(1):73-90. doi: 10.1080/0013188042000178836.
14. Dobzhansky T. Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Am Biol Teach 1973;35:125-9.
15. Driver R, Squires A, Rushworth P, Wood-Robinson V. Making sense of secondary science. New York, NY: Routledge; 1994.
16. Evans EM. Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognit Psychol 2001;42(3):217-66. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0749.
17. Fisher KM. The importance of prior knowledge in college science instruction. In: Dunal DW, Wright EL, Day JB, editors. Reform in Undergraduate Science Teaching for the 21st Century. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing; 2004. p. 69-83.
18. Florida State Department of Education (FLDOE). Sunshine State Science Standards. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Education; 2008.
19. Futuyma D. Natural selection: How evolution works. Retrieved February 5, 2008, from http://www.actionbioscience.org/evolution/futuyma.html; 2002.
20. Gallup G. (2008). Evolution, creationism and intelligent design. Retrieved October 25, 2008, from http://www.gallup.com/poll/21814/Evolution-Creationism-Intelligent-Design.aspx.
21. Garvin-Doxas K, Klymkowsky MW. Understanding randomness and its impact on student learning: lessons learned from building the biology concept inventory. CBE Life Sci Educ 2008;7(2):227-33. doi: 10.1187/cbe.07-08-0063.
22. Gould SJ. The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2002.
23. Haidar AH. Prospective chemistry teachers' conceptions of the conservation of matter and related concepts. J Res Sci Teach 1997;34(2):181-97. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199702)34:2<181::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-P.
24. Hill L. Changing minds: developmental education for conceptual change. J Adult Dev 2004;11(1):29-40. doi: 10.1023/B:JADE.0000012525.69639.5d.
25. Hoy A, Davis H, Pape SJ. Teacher knowledge and beliefs. In: Alexander PA, Winne PH, editors. Handbook of educational psychology. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2006. p. 715-37.
26. Jarvis T, Pell A, McKeon F. Changes in primary teachers' science knowledge and understanding during a two year in-service programme. Res Sci Technol Educ 2003;21(1):17-42. doi: 10.1080/02635140308341.
27. Kikas E. Teachers' conceptions and misconceptions concerning three natural phenomena. J Res Sci Teach 2004;41(5):432-48. doi: 10.1002/tea.20012.
28. Lawrenz F. Misconceptions of physical science concepts among elementary school teachers. Sch Sci Math 1986;86(8):654-60.
29. Llinares S, Krainer K. Mathematics (student) teachers and teacher educators as learners. In: Gutierrez A, Boero P, editors. Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers B.V.; 2006.
30. Mazur A. Believers and disbelievers in evolution. Politics Life Sci 2004;23(2):55-61. doi: 10.2990/1471-5457(2004)23[55:BADIE]2.0.CO;2.
31. McComas WF. The nature of science in science education rationales and strategies. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998.
32. McComas WF. Investigating evolutionary biology in the laboratory. Dubuque, WI: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company; 2006.
33. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.
34. Miller KR. Finding Darwin's God: a scientist's search for common ground between God and evolution. New York: Cliff Street Books, HarperCollins; 1999.
35. Miller KR. Only a theory: evolution and the battle for America's soul. New York: Viking Press; 2008.
36. Moore R. Teaching evolution: do state standards matter? Rep Natl Cent Sci Educ 2001;21(1-2):19-21.
37. National Academy of Sciences. Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1998.
38. National Academy of Sciences. Science, evolution and creationism. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2008.
39. National Research Council. National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.
40. National Research Council. Taking science to school: learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2007.
41. National Science Teachers Association. An NSTA position statement on the teaching of evolution. J Coll Sci Teach. 1997;27(1):7-8.
42. Nickerson R. Cognition and chance, the psychology of probabilistic reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2004.
43. Pajares MF. Teachers' beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Rev Educ Res 1992;62(3):307-32.
44. Palmquist BC, Finley FN. Preservice teachers' views of the nature of science during a postbaccalaureate science teaching program. J Res Sci Teach 1997;34(6):595-615. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199708)34:6<595::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-I.
45. Sadler TD. Evolutionary theory as a guide to socioscientific decision-making. J Biol Educ 2005;39(2):68-72.
46. Scharmann LC, Smith MU, James MC, Jensen M. Explicit reflective nature of science instruction: Evolution, intelligent design, and umbrellaology. J Sci Teach Educ 2005;16(1):27-41. doi: 10.1007/s10972-005-6990-y.
47. Shaughnessy J. Research on students' understanding of probability. In: Kilpatrick J, Martin WG, Schifter D, editors. A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM; 2003. p. 216-26.
48. Shulman L. Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harv Educ Rev 1987;57(1):1-22.
49. Sinatra GA, Southerland SA, McConaughy F, Demastes JW. Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. J Res Sci Teach 2003;40:510-28. doi: 10.1002/tea.10087.
50. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty, heuristics and biases. In: Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, editors. Judgment under uncertainty, heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1982. p. 3-21.
51. University of California Museum of Paleontology. (2006, October). Understanding evolution. Retrieved October 3, 2006, from The University of California Museum of Paleontology, Berkeley, and the Regents of the University of California. Web site: http://evolution.berkely.edu.
52. Vosniadou S. Exploring the relationships between conceptual change and intentional learning. In: Sinatra GM, Pintrich R, editors. Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003. p. 377-406.
53. Wolpert L. Six impossible things before breakfast: the evolutionary origins of belief. London: Faber and Faber; 2007.