Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison

Standards in Genomic Sciences

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 117-134

  Auch, Alexander F ^a   von Jan, Mathias ^b   Klenk, Hans Peter ^b   Göker, Markus ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE DSMZ GERMAN COLLECTION OF MICROORGANISMS AND CELL CULTURES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Archaea; Bacteria; BLAST; GBDP; Genomics; MUMmer; Phylogeny; Species concept; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

EID: 77952891913     PISSN: 19443277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4056/sigs.531120     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576-4579 PubMed doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576
2. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O, Krichevsky MI, Moore LH, Moore WEC, Murray RGE, Stackebrandt E, et al. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Reconciliation of Approaches to Bacterial Systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37:463-464
3. Schleifer KH. Classification of Bacteria and Archaea: Past, present and future. Syst Appl Microbiol (In press)
4. Tindall BJ, Rosselló-Móra R, Busse HJ, Ludwig W, Kämpfer P. Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:249-266. PubMed doi:10.1099/ijs.0.016949-0
5. Brenner DJ. Deoxyribonucleic acid reassociation in the taxonomy of enteric Bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1973; 23:298-307
6. De Ley J. Reexamination of the association between melting point, buoyant density, and chemical base composition of deoxyribonucleotide acid. J Bacteriol 1970; 101:738-754. PubMed
7. Johnson JL. Use of nucleic-acid homologies in the taxonomy of anaerobic Bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1973; 23:308-315
8. Rosselló-Mora R. DNA-DNA reassociation methods applied to microbial taxonomy and their critical evaluation. In: Molecular Identification, Systematics and Population Structure of Prokaryotes. E. Stackebrandt (ed), Springer, Berlin, 2006:23-28
9. rd edition. C.A. Reddy (ed), ASM Press, Washington D.C., 2007:624-652
10. Elahi E, Ronaghi M. Pyrosequencing: a tool for DNA sequencing analysis. Methods Mol Biol 2004; 255:211-219. PubMed
11. De Ley J, De Smedt J. Improvements of the membrane filter method for DNA:rRNA hybridization. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1975; 41:287-307. PubMed doi:10.1007/BF02565064
12. Klenk HP, Haas B, Schwass V, Zillig W. Hybridization homology: A new parameter for the analysis of phylogenetic relations, demonstrated with the urkingdom of the archaebacteria. J Mol Evol 1986; 24:167-173. doi:10.1007/BF02099964
13. Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:7188-7196. PubMed doi:10.1093/nar/gkm864
14. MacKenzie S. High-throughput interpretation of pathways and biology. Drug News Perspect 2001; 14:54-57. PubMed
15. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:2567-2572. PubMed doi:10.1073/pnas.0409727102
16. Deloger M, Karoui ME, Petit MA. A genomic distance based on MUM indicates discontinuity between most bacterial species and genera. J Bacteriol 2009; 191:91-99. PubMed doi:10.1128/JB.01202-08
17. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81-91. PubMed doi:10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0
18. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990; 215:403-410. PubMed
19. Kent WJ. BLAT - the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res 2002; 12:656-664. PubMed
20. Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M, Antonescu C, Salzberg SL. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol 2004; 5:R12. PubMed doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12
21. Auch AF, Henz SR, Holland BR, Göker M. Genome BLAST distance phylogenies inferred from whole plastid and whole mitochondrion genome sequences. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7:350. PubMed doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-350
22. Charlebois R, Beiko R, Ragan M. Genome phylogenies. In: Organelles, Genomes and Eukaryote Phylogeny. R. Hirt & D. Horner (eds), CRC Press, Boca Raton/London/New York/Washington, D.C., 2004:189-206
23. Clarke GDP, Beiko RG, Ragan MA, Charlebois RL. Inferring genome trees by using a filter to eliminate phylogenetically discordant sequences and a distance matrix based on mean normalized BLASTP scores. J Bacteriol 2002; 184:2072-2080. PubMed doi:10.1128/JB.184.8.2072-2080.2002
24. Henz SR, Huson DH, Auch AF, Nieselt-Struwe K, Schuster SC. Whole-genome prokaryotic phylogeny. Bioinformatics 2005; 21:2329-2335. PubMed doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth324
25. Wolf YI, Rogozin I, Grishin N, Tatusov R, Koonin E. Genome trees constructed using five different approaches suggest new major bacterial clades. BMC Evol Biol 2001; 1:8. PubMed doi:10.1186/1471-2148-1-8
26. Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM. Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in Bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44:846-849
27. Klenk HP. Genome der Prokaryonten. In: Angewandte Mikrobiologie. G. Antranikian (ed), Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2005:93-107
28. Tettelin H, Feldblyum T. Bacterial genome sequencing. Methods Mol Biol 2009; 551:231-247. PubMed doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-999-4_18
29. Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2: 130-147
30. Liolios K, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Kyrpides NC. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2007: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36:D475-D479. PubMed doi:10.1093/nar/gkm884
31. Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova NN, Kunin V, Goodwin L, Wu M, Tindall BJ, et al. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature 2009; 462:1056-1060. PubMed doi:10.1038/nature08656
32. Klenk HP, Göker M. En route to a genome-based classification of Archaea and Bacteria? Syst Appl Microbiol (In press). PubMed
33. Schwartz S, Kent WJ, Smit A, Zhang Z, Baertsch R, Hardison RC, Haussler D, Miller W. Humanmouse alignments with BLASTZ. Genome Res 2003; 13:103-107. PubMed doi:10.1101/gr.809403
34. Delgado-Friedrichs O, Dezulian T, Huson DH. A meta-viewer for biomolecular data. GI Jahrestagung 2003:375-380. Software freely available from http://www-ab.informatik.unituebingen.de/software/cgviz
35. Auch AF, Henz SR, Göker M. Phylogenies from whole genomes: Methodological update within a distance-based framework. German Conference on Bioinformatics, 2006. Available online, urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-opus-34178
36. Sokal RR, Rohlf JF. Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco; 1969 pp. 533
37. nd English edition. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam; 1998 pp. 198-199
38. R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. 2005 http://www.r-project.org/
39. Lee C, Grasso C, Sharlow MF. Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics 2002; 18:452-464. PubMed doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.3.452
40. Swofford DL. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), Version 4.0 b10. 2002, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
41. Lander ES, Waterman MS. Genomic mapping by fingerprinting random clones: a mathematical analysis. Genomics 1988; 2:231-239. PubMed doi:10.1016/0888-7543(88)90007-9
42. Göker M, Grimm GW. General functions to transform associate data to host data and their use in phylogenetic inference from sequences with intra- individual variability. BMC Evol Biol 2008; 8:86. PubMed doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-86
43. Labeda DP. DNA relatedness among the Streptomyces fulvissimus and Streptomyces griseoviridis phenotypic cluster groups. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1998; 48:829-832.
44. T). Stand Genomic Sci 2009; 1:29-37. doi:10.4056/sigs.13134
45. T). Stand Genomic Sci (In press)