Restricting weights in supplier selection decisions in the presence of dual-role factors

Applied Mathematical Modelling

Volumn 34, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 2820-2830

  Sean, Reza Farzipoor ^a  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis; Dual role factors; Supplier selection; Weight restrictions

Indexed keywords

CERTAIN FACTOR; DEA MODELS; DECISION MAKER'S PREFERENCES; DECISION MAKERS; INPUT AND OUTPUTS; MULTIPLE FACTORS; NUMERICAL EXAMPLE; RELATIVE IMPORTANCE; ROBUST MODELS; SUPPLIER SELECTION; SUPPLIER SELECTION PROCESS; WEIGHT RESTRICTION;

DATA HANDLING; DECISION THEORY; LINEAR PROGRAMMING;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 77952887906     PISSN: 0307904X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2009.12.016     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Shin H., Collier D.A., Wilson D.D. Supply management orientation and supplier/buyer performance. J. Oper. Manage. 2000, 18(3):317-333.
2. Farzipoor Saen R. Suppliers selection in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal data. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007, 183(2):741-747.
3. Farzipoor Saen R., Zohrehbandian M. A data envelopment analysis approach for supplier selection in volume discount environments. Int. J. Procur. Manage. 2008, 1(4):472-488.
4. Farzipoor Saen R. Supplier selection by the new AR-IDEA model. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2008, 39(11-12):1061-1070.
5. Farzipoor Saen R. Using data envelopment analysis for ranking suppliers in the presence of nondiscretionary factors. Int. J. Procur. Manag. 2009, 2(3):229-243.
6. R. Farzipoor Saen, A new model for selecting third-party reverse logistics providers in the presence of multiple dual-role factors, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol, in press.
7. Beasley J. Comparing university departments. Omega 1990, 8(2):171-183.
8. Beasley J. Determining teaching and research efficiencies. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 1995, 46(4):441-452.
9. Cook W.D., Green R.H., Zhu J. Dual-role factors in data envelopment analysis. IIE Trans. 2006, 38(2):105-115.
10. Zeng Z.B., Li W., Zhu W. Partner selection with a due date constraint in virtual enterprises. Appl. Math. Comput. 2006, 175(2):1353-1365.
11. Ghodsypour S.H., O'Brien C. The total cost of logistics in supplier selection, under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2001, 73(1):15-27.
12. Dahel N.E. Vendor selection and order quantity allocation in volume discount environments. Supply Chain Manage.: Int. J. 2003, 8(4):335-342.
13. Talluri S., Baker R.C. A multi-phase mathematical programming approach for effective supply chain design. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2002, 141(3):544-558.
14. Ip W.H., Yung K.L., Wang D. A branch and bound algorithm for sub-contractor selection in agile manufacturing environment. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2004, 87(2):195-205.
15. Talluri S., Narasimhan R. Vendor evaluation with performance variability: a max-min approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2003, 146(3):543-552.
16. Kumar M., Vrat P., Shankar R. A fuzzy goal programming approach for vendor selection problem in a supply chain. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2004, 46(1):69-85.
17. Hajidimitriou Y.A., Georgiou A.C. A goal programming model for partner selection decisions in international joint ventures. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2002, 138(3):649-662.
18. Cebi F., Bayraktar D. An integrated approach for supplier selection. Logist. Inform. Manage. 2003, 16(6):395-400.
19. Cakravastia A., Takahashi K. Integrated model for supplier selection and negotiation in a make-to-order environment. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2004, 42(21):4457-4474.
20. Arunkumar N., Karunamoorthy L., Anand S., Ramesh Babu T. Linear approach for solving a piecewise linear vendor selection problem of quantity discounts using lexicographic method. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2006, 28(11-12):1254-1260.
21. Karpak B., Kumcu E., Kasuganti R.R. Purchasing materials in the supply chain: managing a multi-objective task. Eur. J. Purchas. Supply Manage. 2001, 7(3):209-216.
22. Kameshwaran S., Narahari Y., Rosa C.H., Kulkarni D.M., Tew J.D. Multiattribute electronic procurement using goal programming. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007, 179(2):518-536.
23. Wang G., Huang S.H., Dismukes J.P. Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2004, 91(1):1-15.
24. Pi W.N., Low C. Supplier evaluation and selection via Taguchi loss functions and an AHP. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2006, 27(5-6):625-630.
25. Noorul Haq A., Kannan G. Design of an integrated supplier selection and multi-echelon distribution inventory model in a built-to-order supply chain environment. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2006, 44(10):1963-1985.
26. Kahraman C., Cebeci U., Ulukan Z. Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logist. Inform. Manage. 2003, 16(6):382-394.
27. Wang G., Huang S.H., Dismukes J.P. Manufacturing supply chain design and evaluation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2005, 25(1-2):93-100.
28. Sha D., Che Z. Supply chain network design: partner selection and production/distribution planning using a systematic model. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2006, 57(1):52-62.
29. Min H. International supplier selection: a multi-attribute utility approach. Inter. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manage. 1994, 24(5):24-33.
30. Xia W., Wu Z. Supplier selection with multiple criteria in volume discount environments. Omega 2007, 33(5):494-504.
31. Dulmin R., Mininno V. Supplier selection using a multi-criteria decision aid method. J. Purchas. Supply Manage. 2003, 9(4):177-187.
32. Bhutta K.S., Huq F. Supplier selection problem: a comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process approaches. Supply Chain Manage.: Int. J. 2002, 7(3):126-135.
33. Liu F.F., Hai H.L. The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2005, 97(3):308-317.
34. Chan F.T.S. Interactive selection model for supplier selection process: an analytical hierarchy process approach. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2003, 41(15):3549-3579.
35. Bayazit O. Use of analytic network process in vendor selection decisions. Benchmarking: Int. J. 2006, 13(5):566-579.
36. Lin C.W.R., Chen H.Y.S. A fuzzy strategic alliance selection framework for supply chain partnering under limited evaluation resources. Comput. Ind. 2004, 55(2):159-179.
37. Ohdar R., Ray P.K. Performance measurement and evaluation of suppliers in supply chain: an evolutionary fuzzy-based approach. J. Manuf. Technol. Manage. 2004, 15(8):723-734.
38. Bevilacqua M., Petroni A. From traditional purchasing to supplier management: a fuzzy logic-based approach to supplier selection. Int. J. Logist.: Res. Appl. 2002, 5(3):235-255.
39. Chen C.T., Lin C.T., Huang S.F. A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2006, 102(2):289-301.
40. Chang S.L., Wang R.C., Wang S.Y. Applying fuzzy linguistic quantifier to select supply chain partners at different phases of product life cycle. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2006, 100(2):348-359.
41. Kwong C.K., Ip W.H., Chan J.W.K. Combining scoring method and fuzzy expert systems approach to supplier assessment: a case study. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 2002, 13(7):512-519.
42. Choy K.L., Lee W.B., Lo V. An intelligent supplier management tool for benchmarking suppliers in outsource manufacturing. Expert Syst. Appl. 2002, 22(3):213-224.
43. Choy K.L., Lee W.B. A generic supplier management tool for outsourcing manufacturing. Supply Chain Manage.: Int. J. 2003, 8(2):140-154.
44. Choy K.L., Lee W.B., Lo V. Development of a case based intelligent supplier relationship management system-linking supplier rating system and product coding system. Supply Chain Manage.: Int. J. 2004, 9(1):86-101.
45. Lau H.C.W., Lau P.K.H., Fung R.Y.K., Chan F.T.S., Ip R.W.L. A virtual case benchmarking scheme for vendors' performance assessment. Benchmarking: Int. J. 2005, 12(1):61-80.
46. Weber C.A. A data envelopment analysis approach to measuring vendor performance. Supply Chain Manage. 1996, 1(1):28-39.
47. Weber C.A., Current J., Desai A. An optimization approach to determining the number of vendors to employ. Supply Chain Manage.: Int. J. 2000, 5(2):90-98.
48. Braglia M., Petroni A. A quality assurance-oriented methodology for handling trade-offs in supplier selection. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manage. 2000, 30(2):96-111.
49. Liu J., Ding F.Y., Lall V. Using data envelopment analysis to compare suppliers for supplier selection and performance improvement. Supply Chain Manage.: Int. J. 2000, 5(3):143-150.
50. Forker L.B., Mendez D. An analytical method for benchmarking best peer suppliers. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 2001, 21(1/2):195-209.
51. Talluri S., Sarkis J. A model for performance monitoring of suppliers. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2002, 40(16):4257-4269.
52. Banker R.D., Charnes A., Cooper W.W. Some methods for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 1984, 30(9):1078-1092.
53. Talluri S., Narasimhan R., Nair A. Vendor performance with supply risk: a chance-constrained DEA approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2006, 100(2):212-222.
54. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1978, 2(6):429-444.
55. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Wei Q.L., Huang Z.M. Cone-ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 1989, 20(7):1099-1118.
56. Thompson R.G., Langemeier L.N., Lee C.T., Lee E., Thrall R.M. The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to kansas farming. J. Econ. 1990, 46(1/2):93-108.
57. Cooper W.W., Seiford L.M., Zhu J. Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis 2004, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
58. Wong Y.H.B., Beasley J.E. Restricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 1990, 41(9):829-835.
59. Farzipoor Saen R. A new mathematical approach for suppliers selection: accounting for non-homogeneity is important. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007, 185(1):84-95.
60. Farzipoor Saen R. A new approach for selecting slightly non-homogeneous vendors. J. Adv. Manag. Res. 2009, 6(2):144-153.