Integrated model for supplier selection and negotiation in a make-to-order environment

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 42, Issue 21, 2004, Pages 4457-4474

  Cakravastia, A ^a,b   Takahashi, K ^a  

^a HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b BANDUNG INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; DECISION MAKING; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; SCHEDULING; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

BENDERS DECOMPOSITION METHOD; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (DEA); MAKE-TO-ORDER (MTO) ENVIRONMENT; TCHEBYCHEFF METHOD;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 8644280372     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207540410001727622     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. AKSOY, Y., BUTLER, T. W. and MINOR, D. E. III, 1996, Comparative studies in interactive multiple objective mathematical programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 89, 408-422.
2. BALAKRISHNAN, P. V. and ELIASHBERG, J., 1995, An analytical process model of two-party negotiation. Management Science, 41, 226-243.
3. BARBAROSOGLU, G. and YAZGAC, T., 1997, An application of the analytic hierarchy process to the supplier selection problem. Journal of Production and Inventory Management, First Quarter, 14-21.
4. BENDERS, J. F., 1962, Partitioning procedures for solving mixed-variables programming problems. Numerische Mathematik, 4, 238-252.
5. BUCHANAN, J. T. and DAELLENBACH, H. G., 1987, A comparative evaluation of interactive solution methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 29, 353-359.
6. CAKRAVASTIA, A. and NAKAMURA, N., 2001, Design of web-based manufacturer-supplier negotiation process. In M. J. Smith and G. Salvendy, eds, System, Social, and Internationalization Aspect of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2 (Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum), pp. 363-367.
7. CAKRAVASTIA, A. and NAKAMURA, N., 2002, Model for negotiating the price and due date for a single order with multiple suppliers in a make to order environment. International Journal of Production Research, 40, 3425-3440.
8. CAKRAVASTIA, A. and TAKAHASHI, K., 2003, Integrated bidding and manufacturing planning decisions with contingent orders in a make-to-order environment. Journal of the Japan Industrial Management Association, 54, 291-301.
9. CAKRAVASTIA, A., TOHA, I. S. and NAKAMURA, N., 2002, A two-stage model for the design of supply chain network. International Journal of Production Economics, 80, 231-248.
10. COOPRR, S. and BENDIAB, 1998, CONCENSUS: multi-party negotiation support for conflict resolution in concurrent engineering design. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 9, 155-159.
11. DAVIS, M. and O'SULLIVAN, D., 1999, System design framework for the extended enterprise. Production Planning and Control, 10, 3-18.
12. DE BOER, L., LABRO, E. and MORLACCHI, P., 2001, A review of methods supporting supplier selection. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 7, 75-89.
13. DEGRAEVE, Z. and LABRO, E., 2000, An evaluation of supplier selection methods for a total cost of ownership perspective. European Journal of Operational Research, 125, 34-59.
14. EASTON, F. F. and MOODIE, D. R., 1999, Pricing and lead time decisions for make-to-order firms with contingent orders. European Journal of Operational Research, 116, 305-318.
15. ELHAFSI, M. and ROLAND, E., 1999, Negotiating price/delivery date in a stochastic manufacturing environment. IIE Transactions, 31, 255-270.
16. GHODYSPOUR, S. H. and O'BRIEN, C., 1998, A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. International Journal of Production Economics, 56-57, 199-212.
17. HERAGU, S. S. and CHEN, J. S., 1998, Optimal solution of cellular manufacturing system design: Benders' decomposition approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 107, 175-192.
18. HOLT, G. D., 1998, Which contractor selection methodology? International Journal of Project Management, 16, 153-164.
19. JAHNUKAINEN, J. and LAHTI, M., 1999, Efficient purchasing in make-to-order supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 59, 103-111.
20. JINA, J. and WRIGHT, D., 1997, Using Internet technology for competitive advantage. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference, 'Managing Enterprise - Stakeholders, Engineering, Logistics and Achievement' (Bury St Edmunds: Mechanical Engineering Publ.), pp. 445-452.
21. JINGHUA, H., 1996, A quantitative method used in negotiation support system. Computers Industrial Engineering, 31, 821-826.
22. KAIHARA, T., 2002, An economic multi-agent based approach for automated negotiation in an electronic-commerce server. In Proceedings of the 2002 Japan-USA Symposium on Flexible Automation, Vol. I, pp. 331-334.
23. KERSTEN, G. E., MICHALOWSKI, W., CRAY, D. and LEE, I., 1991, An analytic basis for decision support in negotiation. Naval Research Logistics, 38, 743-761.
24. KERSTEN, G. E. and NORONHA, S. J, 1999, WWW-based negotiation support: design implementation, and use. Decision Support System, 25, 135-154.
25. KINGSMAN, B. G. and MERCER, A., 1997, Strike rate matrices for integrating marketing and production during the tendering process in make-to-order subcontractors. International Transaction of Operational Research, 4, 251-257.
26. KOK, M., 1986, The interface with decision makers and some experimental results in interactive multiple objective programming methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 26, 96-107.
27. KOLISCH, R., 2000, Integration of assembly and fabrication for make-to-order production. International Journal of Production Economics, 68, 287-306.
28. LAWRENCE, S. R., 1994, Negotiating due-dates between customers and producers. International Journal of Production Economics, 37, 127-138.
29. LIAW, C. F., 1998, An iterative improvement approach for the nonpreemptive open shop scheduling problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 111, 509-517.
30. MASELLA, C. and RANGONE, A., 2000, A contingent approach to the design of vendor selection systems for different types of cooperative customer/supplier. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20, 70-84.
31. MILLER, P. A. and KELLE, P., 1998, Quantitative support for buyer-supplier negotiation in just-in-time purchasing. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Spring, 25-30.
32. MOODIE, D. R., 1999, Demand management: the evaluation of price and due date negotiation strategy using simulation. Production and Operation Management, 8, 151-162.
33. MOODIE, D. R. and BOBROWSKI, P. M., 1999, Due date demand management: negotiating the trade-off between price and delivery. International Journal of Production Research, 5, 997-1021.
34. NARASIMHAN, R., 1983, An analytical approach to supplier selection. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 19, 27-32.
35. NYDICK, R. L. and HILL, R. P., 1992, Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 28, 31-36.
36. PRUIT, D. G., 1981, Negotiation Behavior (New York: Academic Press).
37. ROBERT, B. and MACKAY, M., 1998, IT supporting supplier relationship: the role of electronic commerce. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 4, 175-184.
38. STEUER, R. E., 1995, Manual for the ADBASE Multiple Objectives Linear Programming Package (Athens: Terry College of Business, University of Georgia).
39. STEUER, R. E. and CHOO, E. U., 1983, An interactive weighted Tchebycheff procedure for multiobjective programming. Mathematical Programming, 26, 326-344.
40. TAM, M. and TUMMALA, R, 2001, An application of AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. Omega, 29, 171-182.
41. VERMA, R. and PULLMAN, M. E., 1998, An analysis of the supplier selection process. Omega, International Journal Management Science, 26, 739-750.
42. WANG, D., FANG, S. C. and HODGSON, T. J., 1998, A fuzzy due-date bargainer for make-to-order manufacturing system. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part C, Application and Review, 28, 492-497.
43. WEBER, C. A. and CURRENT, J. R., 1993, Multiobjective approach to vendor selection, European Journal of Operational Research, 68, 173-184.
44. WEBER, C. A. and DESAI, A., 1996, Determination of path to vendor market efficiency using parallel coordinates representation: a negotiation tool for buyers. European Journal of Operational Research, 90, 142-155.
45. WEBER, C. A., CURRENT, J. R. and BENTON, W. C., 1991, Vendor selection criteria and method. European Journal of Operational Research, 50, 2-18.
46. WEBER, C. A., CURRENT, J. R. and DESAI, A., 1998, Non-cooperative negotiation strategies for vendor selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 108, 208-223.
47. WEBER, C. A., CURRENT, J. R. and DESAI, A., 2000, VendOR: a structured approach to vendor selection and negotiation. Journal of Business Logistics, 21, 135-167.
48. Wu, T. H., HUANG, K. I. and CHEN, W., 1995, Optimal scheduling plan for a coal shipment problem: an efficient approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 29, 489-493.