Exploring the feasibility and accuracy of Latent Semantic Analysis based text mining techniques to detect similarity between patent documents and scientific publications

Scientometrics

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 289-306

  Magerman, Tom ^a,b   van Looy, Bart ^a,b,c   Song, Xiaoyan ^a,b  

^a Centre for R and D Monitoring (ECOOM)   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c Katholieke Universiteit Leuven   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Author inventor relationships; Latent Semantic Analysis; Patent publication pairs; Science technology linkages; Text mining

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952881605     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0046-6     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Atherton, P., & Borko, H. (1965). A test of factor-analytically derived automated classification methods. AIP Report AIP-DRP 65-l.
2. Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2006). The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research. NBER Working Paper No. 11917. Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
3. Bassecoulard, E., & Zitt, M. (2004). Patents and publications: The lexical connection. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S& T systems (pp. 665-694). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
4. Baeza-Yates, R., & Ribeiro-Neto, B. (1999). Modern information retrieval. New York: ACM Press.
5. Berry, M. W. (Ed.). (2003). Survey of text mining. New York: Springer.
6. Berry, M. W., & Browne, M. (1999). Understanding search engines: Mathematical modeling and text retrieval. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
7. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993-1022.
8. Borko, H., & Bemick, M. D. (1963). Automatic document classification. Journal of the ACM, 10, 151-162.
9. Calderini, M., Franzoni, C., & Vezzulli, A. (2005). If star scientists do not patent: An event history analysis of scientific eminence and the decision to patent in the academic world. CESPRI Working Paper No. 169.
10. Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks-an introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales, 22(2), 191-235.
11. Carroll, J. D., & Arabie, P. (1980). Multidimensional scaling. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 607-649). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.
12. Courtial, J. P. (1994). A coword analysis of Scientometrics. Scientometrics, 31(3), 251-260.
13. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S., Furnas, G., Landauer, T., & Harshman, R. (1990). Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 391-407.
14. Eckart, C., & Young, G. (1936). The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika, I, 211-218.
15. Engelsman, E. C., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1994). A patent based cartography of technology. Research Policy, 23, 1-26.
16. European Commission. (2003). Third European Report on S& T Indicators.
17. Fabrizio, K. R., & DiMinin, A. (2005). Commercializing the laboratory: Faculty patenting and the open science environment. Working paper.
18. Glänzel, W., et al. (2004). Biotechnology: An analysis of patents and publications. Report Steunpunt O& O Statistics (www. steunpuntoos. be).
19. Glenisson, P., Glänzel, W., Janssens, F., & De Moor, B. (2005a). Combining full-text and bibliometric information in mapping scientific disciplines. Information Processing & Management, 41(6), 1548-1572.
20. Glenisson, P., Glänzel, W., & Persson, O. (2005b). Combining full-text and bibliometric indicators: A pilot study. Scientometrics, 63(1), 163-180.
21. Grzybek, P., & Kelih, E. (2004). Anton S. Budilovic (1846-1908): A forerunner of quantitative linguistics in Russia? Glottometrics, 7(9), 4-97.
22. Harman, D. (1986). An experimental study of the factors important in document ranking. In F. Rabbit (Ed.), Association for computing machine's ninth conference on research and development in information retrieval. New York: Association for Computing Machines.
23. Harman, D. (1991). Hew effective is suffixing? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 7-15.
24. Hicks, D., Martin, B. R., & Irvine, J. (1986). Bibliometric techniques for monitoring performance in technologically oriented research: The case of integrated-optics. R& D Management, 16(3), 211-223.
25. Hinze, S., & Grupp, H. (1996). Mapping of R& D structures in transdisciplinary areas: New biotechnology in food sciences. Scientometrics, 37(2), 313-335.
26. Hofmann, T. (1999). Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual International SIGIR Conference (pp. 50-57). New York: ACM Press.
27. Janssens, F., Leta, J., Glänzel, W., & De Moor, B. (2006). Towards mapping library and information science. Information Processing and Management, 42(6), 1614-1642.
28. Jardin, N., & van Rijsbergen, C. J. (1971). The use of hierarchic clustering in information retrieval. Information Storage and Retrieval, 7, 217-240.
29. Krovets, B. (1995). Word sense disambiguation for large text databases. Ph. D. Thesis. Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
30. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
31. Lennon, M., Pierce, D. S., Tarry, B. D., & Willett, P. (1981). An evaluation of some conflation algorithms for information retrieval. Journal of Information Science, 3, 177-183.
32. Leopold, E., May, M., & Paaß, G. (2004). Data mining and text mining for science & technology research. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S& T systems (pp. 187-213). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
33. Leydesdorff, L. (2004). The university-industry knowledge relationship: analyzing patents and the science base of technologies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(11), 991-1001.
34. Manning, C. D., & Schütze, H. (2000). Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge: MIT Press.
35. Meyer, M. (2000). Patent citations in a novel field of technology: What can they tell about interactions of emerging communities of science and technology? Scientometrics, 48(2), 151-178.
36. Meyer, M. (2006). Knowledge integrators or weak links? An exploratory comparison of patenting researchers with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology. Scientometrics, 68(3), 545-560.
37. Moens, M. F. (2006). Information extraction: Algorithms and prospects in a retrieval context (The Information Retrieval Series 21). New York: Springer.
38. Murray, F. & Stern, S. (2005). Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis. NBER Working Paper No. 11465. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
39. National Science Foundation (NSF). (2006). Science and Engineering Indicators.
40. Noyons, E. C. M., van Raan, A. F. J., Grupp, H., & Schmoch, U. (1994). Exploring the science and technology interface-inventor author relations in laser medicine. Research Policy, 23(4), 443-457.
41. Ossorio, P. G. (1966). Classification space: A multivariate procedure for automatic document indexing and retrieval. Multivariate Behavior Research, 1, 479-524.
42. Porter, M. F. (1980). An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program, 14(3), 130-137.
43. Porter, M. F. (2001). Snowball: A language for stemming algorithms. (www. snowball. tartarus. org/texts/introduction. html).
44. Porter, A. L., & Newman, N. C. (2004). Patent profiling for competitive advantage. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S& T systems (pp. 587-612). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
45. Rabeharisoa, V. (1992). A special mediation between science and technology: When inventors publish scientific articles in fuel cells. In H. Grupp (Ed.), Dynamics of science-based innovation (pp. 45-72). Berlin: Springer.
46. Salton, G. (1968). Automatic information organization and retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill.
47. Salton, G., & McGill, M. J. (1983). Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York: McGraw Hill.
48. Salton, G., Wong, A., & Yang, C. S. (1975). A Vector Space Model for Automatic Indexing. Communications of the ACM, 18(11), 613-620.
49. Salton, G., & Wu, H. (1981). A term weighting model based on utility theory. In R. N. Oddy, S. E. Robertson, C. J. van Rijsbergen, & R. W. Williams (Eds.), Information retrieval research (pp. 9-22). Boston: Butterworths.
50. Schmoch, U. (2004). The technological output of scientific institutions. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S& T systems (pp. 717-731). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
51. Sparck Jones, K. (1971). Automatic keyword classification for information Retrieval. London: Buttersworth.
52. van Looy, B., Callaert, J., & Debackere, K. (2006). Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? Research Policy, 35(4), 596-608.
53. van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., & Zimmermann, E. (2004). Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: Towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew Effect? Research Policy, 33, 425-441.
54. van Rijsbergen, C. J., Robertson, S. E., & Porter, M. F. (1980). New models in probabilistic information retrieval. London: British Library (British Library Research and Development Report, No. 5587).
55. Vandromme, D., Magerman, T., Song, X., van Looy, B., Hoskens, M., Glenisson, P., Thijs, B., Vertomme, J., De Moor, B., & Duflou, J. (2006). A comparative analysis of distance measures and text mining methods supporting domain studies. Paper presented at the Ninth STI indicator conference, Leuven, 2006.
56. Wong, S. K. M., & Yao, Y. Y. (1995). On modeling information retrieval with probabilistic inference. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 13(1), 69-99.
57. Wyllys, R. E. (1975). Measuring scientific prose with rank-frequency ("Zipf") curves: A new use for an old phenomenon. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science, 12, 30-31.
58. Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.