The development of poetic literacy during the school years

Discourse Processes

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 77-103

  Peskin, Joan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952816474     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01638530902959653     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Beebee, T. O. (1994). The ideology of genre: A comparative study of generic instability. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
2. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.
3. Billow, R. M. (1975). A cognitive developmental study of metaphor comprehension. Developmental Psychology, 11, 415-423.
4. Cacciari, C., & Levorato, M. (1989). How children understand idioms in discourse. Journal of Child Language, 16, 387-405.
5. Carminati, M. N., Stabler, J., Roberts, A. M., & Fischer, M. H. (2006). Readers' responses to sub-genre and rhyme scheme in poetry. Poetics, 34, 204-218.
6. Chamot, A. U., & El-Dinary, P. B. (1999). Children's learning strategies in language immersion classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 319-338.
7. Chi, M. T. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analysis of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271-315.
8. Chi, M. T., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
9. Creeley, R. (1959). Like They Say (Underneath the Tree on Some...). For love. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
10. Culler, J. (1976). Structuralist poetics: Structuralism, linguistics and the study of literature. New York: Cornell University Press.
11. Culler, J. (1994). Structuralism and literature. In D. Keesey (Ed.), Contexts for criticism (pp. 280-289). London: Mayfield.
12. Dixon, P., & Bortolussi, M. (2006, August). Literariness and the process of evaluation. Paper presented at the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature, Franuenworth im Chiemsee, Germany.
13. Elster, C. A., & Hanauer, D. I. (2002). Voicing texts, voices around texts: Reading poems in elementary school classrooms. Research in the Teaching of English, 37, 89-133.
14. Ericsson, K. (2002). Attaining excellence through deliberate practice: Insights from the study of expert performance. In M. Ferrari (Ed.), Pursuit of excellence through education (pp. 21-55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15. Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Eva-Wood, A. L. (2004). Thinking and feeling poetry: Exploring meanings aloud. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 182-191.
17. Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. London: Harvard University Press.
18. Gee, J. P. (2001). Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: Introduction and what is literacy? In E. Cushman, E. R. Kintgen, B. M. Kroll, & M. Rose (Eds.), Literacy: A critical sourcebook (pp. 525-544). Boston: Bedford.
19. Gentner, D. (1988). Metaphor as structure mapping: The relational shift. Child Development, 59(1), 47-59.
20. Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Gibbs, R. W. (1996). Metaphor as a constraint on text understanding. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 214-240). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
22. Gu, P. Y., Hu, G., & Zhang, L. J. (2005). Investigating language learning strategies among lower primary school pupils in Singapore. Language and Education, 19, 281-303.
23. Hakemulder, J. F. (2004). Foregrounding and its effect on readers' perception. Discourse Processes, 38,193-218.
24. Hanauer, D. (1998a). The genre-specific hypothesis of reading: Reading poetry and encyclopedic items. Poetics, 26, 63-80.
25. Hanauer, D. (1998b). Reading poetry: An empirical investigation of formalist, stylistic, and conventionalist claims. Poetics Today, 19, 565-580.
26. Hanauer, D. (1999). Attention and literary education: A model of literary knowledge development. Language Awareness, 8, 15-29.
27. Hanauer, D. (2001). What we know about reading poetry: Theoretical positions and empirical research. In G. Steen & D. Schram (Eds.), The psychologyand sociology of literary texts (pp. 107-128). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
28. Hanauer, D. (2007). Attention-directed literary education: An empirical investigation. In G. Watson & S. Zyngier (Eds.), Literature and stylistics for languagelearners: Theory and practice (pp. 169-180). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
29. Harker, W. J. (1994). Plain sense and poetic significance: Tenth-grade readers reading two poems. Poetics, 22, 199-218.
30. Harris, P. (1982). Cognitive prerequisites to language? British Journal of Psychology, 73, 187-195.
31. Hilscher, M. C., & Cupchik, G. (2005). Reading, hearing, and seeing poetry performed. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 23, 47-64.
32. Hunt, K. (1977). Early blooming and late blooming syntactical structures. In C. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Evaluating writing (pp. 90-104). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
33. Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350-377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Jakobson, R. (1987). Language in literature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. Johnson, M. (1991). Knowing through the body. Philosophical Psychology, 4(1), 3-18.
36. Kamberelis, G. (1999). Genre development and learning: Children writing stories, science reports, and poems. Research in the Teaching of English, 33, 403-459.
37. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Keats, J. (1970). La belle dame sans merci. In H. W. Garrod (Ed.), Keats: Poetical works (pp. 350-351). London, UK: Oxford University Press
39. Kintgen, E. R. (1989). Studying the perception of poetry. In C. R. Cooper (Ed.), Researching response to literature and the teaching of literature (pp. 129-150). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
40. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
41. Kress, G. (1999). Genre and the changing contexts of English language arts. Language Arts, 76, 461-469.
42. Langer, J. A. (1986). Children reading and writing: Structures and strategies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
43. Langer, J. A. (1995). Envisioning literature: Literary understanding and literature instruction. New York: Teachers College Press.
44. Lee, C. D. (1995). A Culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching African American high school students skills in literary interpretation. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 608-630.
45. Levorato, M., & Nemesio, A. (2005). Readers' responses while reading a narrative text. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 23, 19-31.
46. Many, J. E. (1991). The effects of stance and age level on children's literary responses. Journal of Reading Behavior, 23, 61-85.
47. McKeough, A. (2000). Building on the oral tradition: How story composition and comprehension develop. In J. W. Astington (Ed.), Minds in the making (pp. 98-114). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
48. Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22, 389-407.
49. Mukarovsky, J. (1964). Standard language and poetic language. In P. L. Garvin (Ed.), Prague school reader on esthetics, literary structure and style (pp. 17-30). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
50. Pearson, B. (1990). The comprehension of metaphor by preschool children. Journal of Child Language, 17(1), 185-203.
51. Peskin, J. (1998). Constructing meaning when reading poetry: An expert-novice study. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 235-263.
52. Plaut, D. C., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1993). Representational development and theory-of-mind computations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 70-71.
53. Purves, A. C. (1975). Research in the teaching of literature. Elementary English, 52, 463-466.
54. Robinson, K. M. (2001). The validity of verbal reports in children's subtraction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 211-222.
55. Sainsbury, M. (2003). Thinking aloud: Children's interactions with text. Reading Literacy & Language, 37(3), 131-135.
56. Schmidt, S. J. (1989). On the construction of fiction and the invention of facts. Poetics, 18, 319-335.
57. Shimron, J. (1980). Psychological processes behind the comprehensionof a poetic text. Instructional Science, 9, 43-66.
58. Shklovsky, V. (1965). Art as technique. In L. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis (Eds.), Russian formalist criticism: Four essays (pp. 3-24) Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
59. Steen, G. (1989). Metaphor and literary comprehension: Towards a discourse theory of metaphor in literature. Poetics, 18, 113-141.
60. Steen, G. (1994). Understanding metaphor in literature: An empirical approach. New York: Longman.
61. Steen, G., & Schram, D. H. (1996). Literary aspects of reading and thinking out loud. In R. J. Kreuz & M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 329-338). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
62. Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1995). A prototype view of expert teaching. Educational Researcher, 24, 9-17.
63. Svensson, C. (1987). The construction of poetic meaning: A developmental study of symbolic and non-symbolic strategies in the interpretation of contemporary poetry. Poetics, 16, 471-503.
64. van Peer, W. (1986). Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding, London: Croom Helm.
65. van Peer, W., & Hakemulder, J. (2006). Foregrounding. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 546-551). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
66. van Schooten, E., & de Glopper, K. (2003). The development of literary response in secondary education. Poetics, 31, 155-187.
67. van Schooten, E., de Glopper, K., & Stoel, R. D. (2004). Development of attitude toward reading adolescent literature and literary reading behavior. Poetics, 32, 343-386.
68. Viehoff, R. (1986). How to construct a literary poem. Poetics, 15, 287-306.
69. Williams, W. C. (1934). This Is Just to Say. Collected poems: 1909-1939, Volume 1. Cambridge, MA: New Directions Publishing Corporation.
70. Winner, E., McCarthy, M., & Gardner, H. (1980). The ontogenesis of metaphor. In R. Honeck & R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cognition and figurative language (pp. 341-361). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
71. Zwaan, R. A. (1993). Aspects of literary comprehension: A cognitive approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins.