Foregrounding

Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 546-551

  van Peer, W ^a   Hakemulder, J ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aesthetics; Creativity; De automatization; Defamiliarization; Deviation; Empirical studies of literature; Foregrounding; Literariness; Literary history; Literary reception; Literary theory; Parallelism; Poetics; Prague structuralism; Russian formalism

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748524671     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00511-3     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Bordwell D. Narration in fiction film 1985, Routledge, London.
2. Culpeper J. Inferring character from texts; attribution theory and foregrounding theory. Poetics 1996, 23:335-361.
3. Eagle H. Russian formalist film theory 1981, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
4. Emmott C. Responding to style; cohesion, foregrounding and thematic interpretation. Thematics; interdisciplinary studies 2002, 91-117. Benjamins, Amsterdam. M. Louwerse, W. van Peer (Eds.).
5. Erlich V. Russian formalism: history-doctrine 1965, Mouton, The Hague.
6. Fokkema D.W. Continuity and change in Russian formalism, Czech structuralism, and Soviet semiotics. Poetics and Theory of Literature (PTL) 1976, 1(1):153-196.
7. A Prague school reader on esthetics, literary structure and style 1964, Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C.
8. Gibbs R.W., Leggitt J.S., Turner E.A. What's special about figurative language in emotional communication?. The verbal communication of emotions: interdisciplinary perspectives 2002, 125-149. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. S.R. Fussel (Ed.).
9. Hakemulder J. Foregrounding and its effects on readers' perception. Discourse Processes 2004, 38(2):193-218.
10. Hakemulder J. The effect of foregrounding in film. Language and Literature, 2005, in press.
11. Hoorn J.F. A renaissance perspective on the empirical study of literature: an example from psychophysiology. The psychology and sociology of literature 2001, 129-144. Benjamins, Amsterdam. D. Schram, G. Steen (Eds.).
12. Jakobson R. Closing statement; linguistics and poetics. Style in language 1960, 350-377. MIT Press, Cambridge. T.A. Sebeok (Ed.).
13. Krampen M. Jakobson's model of linguistic functions and modern painting. Empirical Studies of the Arts 14. 1996, 1:49-63.
14. Leech G.N. A linguistic guide to English literature 1969, Longman, London.
15. Leech G.N. Linguistics and the figures of rhetoric. Essays on style and language 1966, 135-156. Routledge, London. R.G. Fowler (Ed.).
16. Martindale C. The clockwork muse. The predictability of artistic change 1990, Basic Books, New York.
17. Miall D.S. Anticipation and feeling in literary response: a neurological perspective. Poetics 1995, 23:275-298.
18. Miall D.S., Kuiken D. Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: response to literary stories. Poetics 1994, 22:389-407.
19. Miall D., Kuiken D. Shifting perspectives; readers' feelings and literary response. New perspectives on narrative perspective 2001, 289-301. SUNY Press, Albany, NY. W. Van Peer, S. Chatman (Eds.).
20. Mukařovsk J. Aesthetic function; norm and value as social facts 1970, Department of Slavic Languages and Literature, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
21. Simonton D.K. Lexical choice and aesthetic success: a computer content analysis of 154 Shakespeare sonnets. Computers and the Humanities 1990, 25:251-264.
22. Steiner P. Russian formalism: a metapoetics 1984, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
23. van Peer W. Stylistics and psychology; investigations of foregrounding 1986, Croom Helm, London.
24. van Peer W. Where do literary themes come from?. Thematics; interdisciplinary studies 2002, 253-263. Benjamins, Amsterdam. M. Louwerse, W. Van Peer (Eds.).
25. Vodicka F. Die Struktur der literarischen Entwicklung 1976, Fink, München.
26. Wollen P. Readings and writings; semiotic counter-strategies 1982, New Left Books, London.
27. Zwaan R. Aspects of literary comprehension 1993, Benjamins, Amsterdam.