Factors influencing corneal biomechanical changes after microincision cataract surgery and standard coaxial phacoemulsification

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 890-897

  Alió, Jorge L ^a   Agdeppa, Ma Cecilia C ^a   Rodríguez Prats, Jose Luis ^a   Amparo, Francisco ^a   Piñero, David P ^a  

^a MIGUEL HERNÁNDEZ UNIVERSITY   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; CORNEAL HYSTERESIS; CORNEAL RESISTANCE FACTOR; EYE AXIS LENGTH; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MICROINCISION CATARACT SURGERY; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; WAVEFORM;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 77952496996     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.041     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Kucumen R.B., Yenerel N.M., Gorgun E., Kulacoglu D.N., Oncel B., Kohen M.C., and Alimgil M.L. Corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure changes after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 34 (2008) 2096-2098
2. Kotecha A., Elsheikh A., Roberts C.R., Zhu H., and Garway-Heath D.F. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47 (2006) 5337-5347. http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/47/12/5337 Accessed February 18, 2010
3. Roy A.S., and Dupps Jr. W.J. Effects of altered corneal stiffness on native and postoperative LASIK corneal biomechanical behavior: a whole-eye finite element analysis. J Refract Surg 25 (2009) 875-887
4. Hager A., Loge K., Füllhas M.-O., and Schroeder B. Groβherr M, Wiegand W. Changes in corneal hysteresis after clear corneal cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 144 (2007) 341-346
5. Elkady B., Alió J.L., Ortiz D., and Montalbán R. Corneal aberrations alter microincision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 34 (2008) 40-45
6. Yao K., Tang X., and Ye P. Corneal astigmatism, high order aberrations, and optical quality after cataract surgery: microincision versus small incision. J Refract Surg 22 (2006) S1079-S1082
7. Berdahl J.P., DeStefano J.J., and Kim T. Corneal wound architecture and integrity alter phacoemulsification; evaluation of coaxial, microincision coaxial, and microincision bimanual techniques. J Cataract Refract Surg 33 (2007) 510-515
8. Elkady B., Piñero D., and Alió J.L. Corneal incision quality: microincision cataract surgery versus microcoaxial phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 35 (2009) 466-474
9. Cavallini G.M., Lugli N., Campi L., Lazzerini A., and Longanesi L. Surgically induce astigmatism after manual extracapsular cataract extraction or after phacoemulsification procedure. Eur J Ophthalmol 6 (1996) 257-263
10. Cavallini G.M., Campi L., Masini C., Pelloni S., and Pupino A. Bimanual microphacoemulsification versus coaxial miniphacoemulsification: prospective study. J Cataract Refract Surg 33 (2007) 387-392
11. Luce D. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 156-162
12. Ortiz D., Piñero D., Shabayek M.H., Arnalich-Montiel F., and Alió J.L. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 33 (2007) 1371-1375
13. Chylack Jr. L.T., Wolfe J.K., Singer D.M., Leske M.C., Bullimore M.A., Bailey I.L., Friend J., McCarthy D., and Wu S.-Y. The Lens Opacities Classification System III; the Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 111 (1993) 831-836. http://archopht.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/111/6/831 Accessed February 18, 2010
14. Goldich Y., Barkana Y., Gerber Y., Rasko A., Morad Y., Harstein M., Avni I., and Zadok D. Effect of diabetes mellitus on biomechanical properties of the cornea. J Cataract Refract Surg 35 (2009) 715-719
15. Kotecha A. What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relevant for the clinician?. Surv Ophthalmol 52 suppl 2 (2007) S109-S114
16. Chen M.C., Lee N., Bourla N., and Hamilton D.R. Corneal biomechanical measurements before and after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 34 (2008) 1886-1891
17. Alió J.L., Rodríguez-Prats J.-L., Vianello A., and Galal A. Visual outcome of microincision cataract surgery with implantation of an Acri. Smart lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 1549-1556
18. Guirao A. Theoretical elastic response of the cornea to refractive surgery: risk factors for keratectasia. J Refract Surg 21 (2005) 176-185
19. Comaish I.F., and Lawless M.A. Progressive post-LASIK keratectasia; biomechanical instability or chronic disease process?. J Cataract Refract Surg 28 (2002) 2206-2213
20. Roberts C. The cornea is not a piece of plastic [editorial]. J Refract Surg 16 (2000) 407-413
21. Alio J.L. What does MICS require? The transition to microincisional surgery. In: Alio J.L., Rodriguez Prats J.L., and Galal A. (Eds). MICS: Micro-Incision Cataract Surgery (2004), Highlights of Ophthalmology International, El Dorado, Panama 1-4
22. Alió J.L., Klonowski P., and El Kady B. Microincisional lens surgery. In: Kohnen T., and Koch D.D. (Eds). Cataract and Refractive Surgery: Progress III. (Essentials in Ophthalmology) (2008), Springer, Berlin, Germany 12-13
23. Hollman K.W., Emelianov S.Y., Neiss J.H., Jotyan G., Spooner G.J.R., Juhasz T., Kurtz R.M., and O'Donnell M. Strain imaging of corneal tissue with an ultrasound elasticity microscope. Cornea 21 (2002) 68-73
24. Daxer A., Misof K., Grabner B., Ettl A., and Fratzl P. Collagen fibrils in the human corneal stroma: structure and aging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39 (1998) 644-648. http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/39/3/644 Accessed February 18, 2010
25. Malik N.S., Moss S.J., Ahmed N., Furth A.J., Wall R.S., and Meek K.M. Ageing of the human corneal stroma: structural and biochemical changes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1138 (1992) 222-228
26. Pepose J.S., Feigenbaum S.K., Qazi M.A., Sanderson J.P., and Roberts C.J. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 143 (2007) 39-47
27. Kamiya K., Shimizu K., and Ohmoto F. Effect of aging on corneal biomechanical parameters using the Ocular Response Analyzer. J Refract Surg 25 (2009) 888-893
28. Moreno-Montañés J., Maldonado M.J., García N., Mendiluce L., García-Gómez P.J., and Seguí-Gómez M. Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the Ocular Response Analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49 (2008) 968-974. http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/49/3/968 Accessed February 18, 2010
29. Dupps Jr. W.J., and Wilson S.E. Biomechanics and wound healing in the cornea. Exp Eye Res 83 (2006) 709-720
30. Chang P-Y, Chang S-W, Wang J-Y. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure with Ocular Response Analyzer in childhood myopia. In press, Br J Ophthalmol 2010
31. Shen M., Fan F., Xue A., Wang J., Zhou X., and Lu F. Biomechanical properties of the cornea in high myopia. Vision Res 48 (2008) 2167-2171
32. Laiquzzaman M., Bhojwani R., Cunliffe I., and Shah S. Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis in normal subjects: relevance in clinical context. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 34 (2006) 114-118