Intercultural communication in Asia: Current state and future prospects

Asian Journal of Communication

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 166-180

  Kim, Min Sun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Asia; Cross cultural communication; Ethnocentrism; Intercultural communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952470300     PISSN: 01292986     EISSN: 17420911     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01292981003693351     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Alatas, S.F. (2006). Alternative discourse in Asian social science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Alatas, S.F. (2009). The definition and types of alternative discourses. Retrieved December 9, 2009, from http://www.ios.sinica.edu.tw/cna/download/5b_Alatas_2.pdf
3. Brockner, J., & Chen, Y.-R. (1996). The moderating roles of self-esteem and self-construal in reaction to a threat to the self: Evidence from the People's Republic of China and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 603-615.
4. Bryant, J., & Yang, M.H. (2004). A blueprint for excellence for the Asian communication research. Asian Communication Research, 1, 133-151.
5. Chen, G.-M. (2006). Asian communication studies: What and where to now. The Review of Communication, 6, 295-311.
6. Chen, G.M., & Starosta, W.J. (2003). A review of the concept of intercultural awareness. In W. Jin, X. Lu, & D.R. Heisey (Eds.), Chinese communication studies in the 20th and 21st centuries: Advances, challenges and prospects (pp. 256-268). London: Ablex.
7. Craig, R. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9, 119-161.
8. Dissanayake, W. (Ed.). (1988). Communication theory: The Asian perspective. Singapore: Asian Mass Communication and Information Center.
9. Enriquez, V.G. (1990). Cross-indigenous methods and perspectives. In V.G. Enriquez (Ed.), Indigenous psychology: A book of readings (pp. 210-230). Quezon City, the Philippines: Philippine Psychology Research and Training House.
10. Feyerabend, P.H. (1970). Against method. In M. Radner & S. Winokur (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 4). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
11. Fougere, M., & Moulettes, A. (2007). The construction of the modern West and the backward rest: Studying the discourse of Hofstede's Culture's consequences. Journal of Multicultural Discourse, 1, 1-19.
12. Gao, G., & Xiao, X. (2002). Intercultural/interpersonal communication research in China: A preliminary review. In W. Jia, X. Liu, & D.R. Heisey (Eds.), Chinese communication theory and research: Reflections, new frontiers, and new directions (pp. 21-35). London: Ablex.
13. Giles, H., & Watson, B. (2008). Intercultural and intergroup communication. In D. Wolfgang (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Retrieved September 5, 2009, from http://www.communicationencyclopedia.com/public/tocnode?query intercultural&widen 1&result_number3&from search&id g9781405131995_chunk_g97840513199514_ss50-1&type std&fuzzy0&slop1#citation
14. Gudykunst, W.B. (2002). Intercultural communication theories. In W.B. Gudykunst & B. Mody (Eds.), Handbook of international and intercultural communication (2nd ed., pp. 183-205). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Gudykunst, W.B., & Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Culture and interpersonal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16. Hall, E.T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York: Anchor.
17. Hermans, H.J.M., & Kempen, H.J.G. (1998). Moving cultures: The perilous problems of cultural dichotomies in a globalizing society. American Psychologist, 53, 1111-1120.
18. Ho, P.C. (2001). [Review of the book Intercultural communication]. Asian Communication Journal, 4. Retrieved from http://www.acjournal.org/holdings/vol4/iss2/reviews/horeview. htm
19. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Ishii, S. (2006). Complementing contemporary intercultural communication research with East Asian sociocultural perspectives and practices. China Media Research, 2, 13-20.
21. Ishii, S. (2007). Exploring path to Buddhist enlightenment as ultimate communication. China Media Research, 3, 42-49.
22. Ito, Y. (1992). Theories on intercultural communication styles from a Japanese perspective: A sociological approach. In J. Blumler, J. McLeod, & K. Rosengren (Eds.), Comparatively speaking: Communication and culture across space and time (pp. 238-268). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Jia, W. (2000). Chinese communication scholarship as an expansion of the communication and culture paradigm. In D.R. Heisey (Ed.), Chinese perspectives in rhetoric and communication. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
24. Jia, W. (2002). Introduction: The significance of Chinese communication theory and research in a globalizing world. In W. Jia, X. Lu, & D.R. Heisey (Eds.), Chinese communication theory and research: Reflections, new frontiers, and new directions (pp. xiii-xvii). London: Ablex.
25. Kim, M.S. (in press). Self-construal. In R.L. Jackson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of identity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Kim, M.S. (2002). Non-Western perspectives on human communication: Implications for theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Kim, M.S. (2007a). The four cultures of cultural research. Communication Monographs, 74, 279-285.
28. Kim, M.S. (2007b). Our culture, their culture, and beyond: Further thoughts on ethnocentrism in Hofstede's discourse. Journal of Multicultural Discourse, 2, 1-6.
29. Kim, M.S. (2009). Cultural bias in communication science: Challenges of overcoming ethnocentric paradigms in Asia. Asian Journal of Communication, 19, 412-421.
30. Kim, M.S., & Hubbard, A.E. (2007). Intercultural communication in the global village: how to understand 'The Other'. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36, 223-235.
31. Kim, M.S., Chen, G.M., & Miyahara, A. (2008). Communication as an academic field: East Asia. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The Blackwell international encyclopedia of communication. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Retrieved September 5, 2009, from http://www.communicationencyclopedia.com/public/tocnode?query intercultural&widen 1&result_number 1&fromsearch&fuzzy 0&type std&id g9781405131995_chunk_g978140513199514_ss52-1&slop 1
32. Kim, M.S., Hunter, J.E., Miyahara, A., Horvath, A., Bresnahan, M., & Yoon, H.-J. (1996). Individual vs. culture-level dimensions of individualism and collectivism: Effects on preferred conversational styles. Communication Monographs, 63, 29-49.
33. Kincaid, D.L. (Ed.). (1987). Communication theory: Eastern and Western perspectives. San Diego: Academic Press.
34. Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Kuo, E.C.Y., & Chew, H.E. (2009). Beyond ethnocentrism in communication theory: Towards a culture-centric approach. Asian Journal of Communication, 19, 422-437.
36. Leeds-Hurwitz, W. (1990). Notes in the history of intercultural communication: The Foreign Service Institute and the mandate for intercultural training. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 76, 262-281.
37. Leung, K. (2007). Asian social psychology: Achievements, threats, and opportunities. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 8-15.
38. Lin, D.J. (1999). The historical development and revelation of intercultural communication in the US. Journal of Fu Jian Normal University, 2, 82-88.
39. Martin, J., & Nakayama, T. (2000). Intercultural communication in contexts. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
40. Matsumoto, D. (2007). Comments on the future of Asian social psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 45-47.
41. McCarty, S. (2009). Cultural liberation: East West biculturalism for a new century. Retrieved December 10, 2009, from http://www.edchange.org/multicultural/papers/mccarty.html
42. Miike, Y. (2003). Beyond Eurocentrism in the intercultural field: Searching for an Asiacentric paradigm. In W.J. Starosta & G.-M. Chen (Eds.), Ferment in the intercultural field: Axiology/ value/praxis (pp. 243-276). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Miike, Y. (2006). Asian contributions to communication theory: an introduction. China Media Research, 3, 1-6.
44. Miike, Y. (2009). Harmony without uniformity: An Asiacentric worldview and its communicative implications. In L.A. Samovar, R.E. Porter, & E.R. McDaniel (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (pp. 36-47). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
45. Miike, Y., & Chen, G.M. (2006). Asian approaches to human communication: A selected bibliography (an updated version). China Media Research, 1, 98-106.
46. Miyahara, A., & Kim, M.S. (1994). Requesting styles among 'collectivist' cultures: A comparison between Japanese and Koreans. Intercultural Communication Studies, 6, 104-128.
47. Mukherji, P.N., & Sengupta, C. (Ed.). (2004). Indigeneity and universality in social science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48. Penman, R. (1992). Good theory and good practice: An argument in progress. Communication Theory, 2, 234-250.
49. Rogers, E.M., Hart, W.B., & Miike, Y. (2002). Edward T. Hall and the history of intercultural communication: The United States and Japan. Keio Communication Review, 24, 3-26.
50. Shigemi, I., & Richard, K.L. (Eds.). (1999). Crossing cultural borders: Toward an ethics of intercultural communication: Beyond reciprocal anthropology. The Fourteenth International Symposium, International Research Center for Japanese Studies, Kyoto, Japan. Kyoto: International Research Center for Japanese Studies.
51. Shim, T., Kim, M.S., & Martin, J. (2008). Changing Korea: Implication for culture and communication. New York: Peter Lang.
52. Shi-xu (2005). A cultural approach to discourse. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
53. Simmel, G. (1921). The social significance of the 'Stranger'. In R.E. Park & E.W. Burgess (Eds.), Introduction to the science of sociology (pp. 322-327). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54. Smith, III T.J. (1988). Diversity and order in communication theory: The uses of philosophical analysis. Communication Quarterly, 36, 28-40.
55. Starosta, W., & Chen, G.M. (Eds.). (2003). Ferment in the intercultural field: Axiology/value/ praxis. International and Intercultural Communication Annual 26. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
56. Sumner, W.G. (1906/1940). Folkways. Boston: Ginn.
57. Tsujimura, A. (1987). Some characteristics of the Japanese way of communication. In D.L. Kincaid (Ed.), Communication theory: Eastern and Western perspectives (pp. 115-136). Boston, MA: Academic Press.
58. Wang, G., & Shen, V. (2000). East, west, communication, and theory: Searching for the meaning of searching for Asian communication theories. Asian Journal of Communication, 10,14-32.
59. Wong, P., Manvi, M., & Wong, T.H. (1995). Asiacentrism and Asian American studies? Amerasia Journal, 21, 137-147.
60. Young, R.E. (1996). Intercultural communication: pragmatics, genealogy, deconstruction. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
61. Yum, J.O. (2000). The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. In L.A. Samovar & R.E. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (9th ed., pp. 63-73). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
62. Zhang, Y.B. (2008). Asian communication modes. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The Blackwell international encyclopedia of communication (pp. 775-779). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
63. Zhang, Y.B., Harwood, J., & Hummert, M.L. (2005). Perceptions of conflict management styles in Chinese intergenerational dyads. Communication Monographs, 72, 71-91.