Our culture, their culture and beyond: Further thoughts on ethnocentrism in hofstede’s discourse

Journal of Multicultural Discourses

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 26-31

  Kim, Min Sun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43249137427     PISSN: 17447143     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2167/md051c.2     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Buss, A.R. (ed.) (1979) Psychology in Social Context. New York: Irvington.
2. Featherman, D.L. (1993) What does society need from higher education? Items 47 (2/3), 38-43.
3. Gergen, K.J. (1979) The positivist image in social psychological theory. A.R. Buss (ed.) Psychology in Social Context (pp. 193-212). New York: Irvington.
4. Hofstede, G. (1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5. Hofstede, G. (2001) Culture’s Consequences (2nd ed.): Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Hofstede, G. (2007) A European in Asia. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 10, 16-21 (elaborated from keynote speech at the 6th International Conference of the Asian Association for Social Psychology, Wellington, New Zealand, 4th April, 2005)
7. Kagitcibasi, C. (1996) The autonomous-relational self: A new synthesis. European Psychologist 1, 180-186.
8. Kim, M.S. (2002) Multicultural Perspectives on Human Communication: Implications for Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Kim, M.S. and Leung, T. (2000) A multicultural view of conflict management styles: Review of past research and critical synthesis. In M. Roloff (ed.) Communication Yearbook 23 (pp. 227-269). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Klein, A.C. (1995) Meeting the Great Bliss Queen: Buddhists, Feminists, and the Art of the Self. Boston, MA: Beacon.
11. Kuhn, T. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. McSweeney, B. (2002) Hofstede’s ‘Model of National Cultural Differences and Consequences’: A triumph of faith - A failure of analysis. Human Relations 55, 89-118.